Betrayal 1983

[Tammara Freimark]

Betrayalis a 1983 British drama film adaptation of Harold Pinter's 1978 play of the same name. With a semi-autobiographical screenplay by Pinter, the film was produced by Sam Spiegel and directed by David Jones. It was critically well received. Distributed by 20th Century Fox International Classics in the United States, it was first screened in movie theaters in New York in February 1983.[1]

Betrayal follows significant moments in the seven-year extramarital affair of art gallery owner Emma with literary agent Jerry, the best friend of her husband Robert, a London publisher. Nine sequences are shown in reverse chronological order with Emma and Jerry meeting for the first time at the conclusion of the film.

New York Times film critic Vincent Canby said Harold Pinter is "justifiably celebrated" and that "nothing he has written for the stage has ever been as simply and grandly realized on the screen as his Betrayal". He applauded the performances of the three lead actors, the direction, and the meaningful application of reverse chronology, and summed up that "I can't think of another recent film that is simultaneously so funny, so moving and so rigorously unsentimental. ... This is pure Pinter well served by collaborators."[4] Chicago Sun-Times film critic Roger Ebert similarly commented that the film's reverse chronology, far from being a gimmick, is the key element to its brilliance. He gave the movie four stars.[5]

The only other character (aside from a waiter who appears in one scene) is Robert, Emma's husband and Jerry's (alleged) best friend. Judith, Jerry's wife, is mentioned frequently but never appears. The play's style is generally minimalist: besides featuring only three real characters it has few dramatic set pieces, uses economical dialogue, and is usually staged quite sparingly. However, this does not prevent Pinter from using liberal and complex symbolism.

The title refers most obviously to Emma and Jerry's sleeping together for seven years behind Robert's back, but that's only one of many betrayals in the play. The characters lie almost constantly not only to each other but to themselves.

Pinter wrote the play while having an affair with the historian Antonia Fraser, but claims that it was actually based on another of his long-running extramarital affairs, with the TV presenter Joan Bakewell.

A film of Betrayal was made in 1983, directed by David Jones and starring Ben Kingsley as Robert, Jeremy Irons as Jerry, and Patricia Hodge as Emma. Pinter, a screenwriter as well as playwright, wrote the adaptation himself.

Tropes found in Betrayal include: Back to Front Beat: Pinter's famous pauses. Call-Back and Call-Forward: Lots, to bring together the confusing back-and-forth timeline. Deadpan Snarker: Robert, especially with JerryJerry: I lived with her.Robert: Yes. In the afternoons.Jerry: Sometimes very long ones. For seven years.Robert: Yes, you certainly knew all there was to know about that. About the seven years of afternoons. Double Meaning: Squash isn't just squash in this play. Feminine Women Can Cook: Emma attempts to play a traditionally feminine role and create an air of domesticity between herself and Jerry by putting on an apron and making him a stew. It's somewhat spoiled when she confesses that she's pregnant with Robert's baby. He-Man Woman Hater: Robert derides Emma in front of Jerry and, when she asks if she could come and watch him and Jerry play squash he explains very patronisingly that squash is for men and 'you don't actually want a woman within a mile of the place'. Jerry's reduction of Emma to a romantic fantasy rather than a thinking feeling human being is also an example. Housewife: Emma is restricted to this role for most of her marriage. When she opens an art gallery it effectively ends her relationship with Jerry because she no longer has time to see him. Hypocrite: Emma is outraged and decides she wants a divorce when she finds out Robert has been 'betraying me for years' with other women, ignoring the fact that she spent seven years sleeping with his best friend. I Know You Know I Know: There are hints of this in the big reveal in Scene Two, where Jerry finds out that Robert has known about the affair since 1973 rather than having found out the day before. Implacable Man: Robert has shades of this (for example, in his studied indifference when Emma tells him about the affair: 'Ah. Yes. I thought it might be something like that') and is played this way often, including by Kingsley. Mama's Baby, Papa's Maybe: When Emma tells him about the affair Robert is briefly concerned about his son Ned being Jerry's.Robert: Yes, but how long exactly?Emma: Five years.Robert: Five years?PauseNed is one year old.PauseDid you hear what I said?Emma: Yes. He's your son. Jerry was in America. For two months. However, arguably Pinter deliberately avoids the issue of the child's legitimacy by providing the neat and somewhat contrived solution of Ned definitely being Robert's because Jerry was in America when he was conceived, which by removing a real source of concern emphasises the shallow and petty nature of the characters' relationships. One Drink Will Kill the Baby: Decisively averted. Emma has a vodka to get up the courage to tell Jerry she's pregnant. Only One Name: Everyone except for, possibly, Casey (his name is Roger, as Emma snaps at Jerry when getting defensive about her relationship with him, but it isn't clear whether Casey is a surname or nickname). Seasonal Motif: Pinter specifies the season whenever there's a shift in time and they generally have a symbolic reflection on the relationship. The most important example is when Emma is breaking up with Jerry and they argue over whether the last time they met was summer or autumn.Jerry: In the summer, was it?Emma: Well, was it?Jerry: I know it seems -Emma: It was actually the beginning of September.Jerry: Well, that's summer, isn't it?Emma: It was actually extremely cold. It was early autumn.Jerry: It's pretty cold now. Subtext: Standard Pinter. Nobody ever says what they mean. Surprise Pregnancy: Almost certainly Emma's with Ned; given the parlous state of her marriage and the fact that it ruins her relationship with Jerry it seems likely that it was accidental. This is interesting since the play comments on the more open and casual attitudes to sexuality in the 1970s, which developed in large part from the introduction of the Pill in the 1960s. Showing through the pregnancy that sex is still not without obvious consequences therefore underscores the more subtly depicted repercussions of the affair and the message that Everybody Has Lots of Sex is not really making people any happier. The Unseen: Judith. Also the two couples' various children, and Emma's new lover Casey.

Reconstruction The Promise and Betrayal of Democracy, produced in 1983 by the Council of Interracial Books for Children (CIBC), is still relevant. The booklet includes a critique of U.S. history textbooks and a reader for students that outlines and dispels the textbook myths. (The filmstrip that accompanied the booklet is not currently available.)

The consultants for the publication were John Henrik Clarke, William Loren Katz, and John Anthony Scott with the assistance of the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture (NYPL). The 40-page booklet is shared here for free download.

The Zinn Education Project produced a national report on the teaching of the Reconstruction era. The report examines state standards, course requirements, frameworks, and support for teachers in each state. It also includes stories about creative efforts by districts and/or individual teachers in each state to teach outside the textbook about Reconstruction.

The Make Reconstruction History Visible project is an opportunity for students and teachers to identify and advocate for public recognition of Reconstruction history in their community and the significant accomplishments made by newly freed people and their white allies.

A user is essentially a human being who operates a computer. Little do they know, on the other side of the screen, there is a digital civilization of humanoid computer programs that they have created. If a user writes and compiles a program on a computer, the program will look exactly like the user counterpart in the real world. Users are looked upon by the programs as gods, or even saviors, of their world.

Programs are electronic beings that were written/created by the users. Programs have a unique trait of looking exactly like their user counterpart in the real world. However, despite their human appearance, they are completely different beings than users. They live on pure energy and have circuitry all over their bodies, which glow in fantastic colors that vary from program to program.

In 1980, ENCOM, an American technology company in California, brings their first mainframe online, which had the greatest state-of-the-art technology at the time. That same year, computer programmer and hacker Kevin Flynn gets his doctorate from Caltech and joins ENCOM. He soon climbs up the ranks and becomes a lead software engineer. In his spare time, he begins writing video games on his private terminal at the ENCOM offices including Matrix Blaster, Vice Squad, Lightcycle and what would be his most popular title, Space Paranoids.

In 1981, Flynn was ready to present his video games to the executives at ENCOM but when he went to his terminal to pull up the game files, he discovered that they were stolen. Three months later, another software engineer named Ed Dillinger presents ENCOM with Flynn's games, claiming them as his own creations. The games became extremely popular at arcades and ENCOM's profits soar. As a result Dillinger gets promoted to Senior Executive VP and fires Flynn. Shortly after, Flynn opens up Flynn's Arcade, which turns out to be very popular with gamers.

3a8082e126