> 1) Everyone gave it thumbs-up as a tool for improving dialog :)
Excellent!
One of the reasons I created several versions of the sheets is to add
variety.
> 2) The plotter printed the sheet with extra space around the outside.
> I explained that notes were "meant" to be written in the middle of the
> sheet. At first they were, but people migrated to writing the notes
> outside the margins. They said it was so they could group the notes to
> the items (numbered steps around the board) more easily. ... I'll try
> a larger sheet with no extra borders next time. (It might also be
> interesting to make the sheet with only the final list of 3 TODOs in
> the middle and the rest around the outside. Maybe like a wheel with
> spokes.)
Yes I've seen this before.
Some groups don't write many notes, others go to town and write on every
scape of space.
> 3) Nobody knew what to do with the zig-zag line in the middle. We
> assumed it was for "ups and downs" during the sprint but still didn't
> know what to do with it.
Its for the timeline. Perhaps I need to make it clearer.
Sorry about that.
> 4) The main 'facilitating' I did was clear the desk, get pens,
> describe what little I knew of the sheet's intention, point to the
> parts to read, say 'go', remind team to write things down, ask team
> occasionally if they thought they were on track.
Brilliant, having done a sheet once they can probably do it again
without even that.
> 5) A "manager-type" took notes along the way which were used verbatim
> as the "things to do". Everyone seemed OK with this. That didn't seem
> to big a deal to me this time. The format was loose because the
> project is in a funding lull and nobody can really do much but create
> a list of things to do when the funding kicks in. In a regular
> retrospective I might ask that no notes be taken other than on the
> sheet until the meeting is over.
This is new. I know the presence of a manager in a retrospective
generally can be a double-edged sword - it can inhibit people but it can
also allow the manager to hear what people think.
I would be concerned if the taking of additional notes inhibits people
from speaking freely or stops the manager from taking part.
I wonder if this manager does this in normal retrospectives?
> Thanks for the tool. Hope this feedback is useful.
My pleasure, feedback is very useful
Thanks again
allan
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
allan kelly +44 773 310 7131 http://www.allankelly.net
My books:
* NEW Business Patterns for Software Developers tinyurl.com/6vypfxa
Changing Software Development: Learning to be Agile tinyurl.com/6lq8fwc
------------------------------------------------------------------------