Patrick L Humphrey fired from Rice for sexual perversion.
tiptoe
ed types. Sometimes it reads like the National Enquirer.
Anonymous wrote:
> Houston (API) - An employee of Rice University was fired and arrested for
> taking naked pictures of himself masturbating and putting the pictures in
> women's restrooms at the University. Patrick L. Humphrey was dismissed from
> the University after surveillance cameras caught him virtually in the act.
> "It's the most disgusting thing we've run across" quotes Malcom Gillis,
> President of Rice University. "We have a zero tolerance policy on that sort
> of behavior" he added. The complaints about Humphrey started last year when
> the university starting receiving loads of email complaining about
> Humphrey's Internet activities. This in turn led to an investigation, which
> just happened to stumble across Humphrey taking pictures of himself while
> masturabting in public places. "We were just in shock", said one anonymous
> female freshman who was a victim. "We are here for an education and to find
> perverts like this at the University" she added. Records show that Humphrey
> had also been disciplined for harassment of Internet users during his
> employment at Rice. An ongoing University police investigation has begun to
> see if other related incidents at the University can be traced to Humphrey.
Dana
>Surprisingly, The Chronicle of Higher Ed is full of stuff like this by higher
>ed types. Sometimes it reads like the National Enquirer.
>
>Anonymous wrote:
[snipped bullshit]
Tiptoe you stupid twat, don't copy that crap in your insipid reply.
What a dumbfuck you are.
--
-=Dana=-
"We may rise and fall, but in the end,
we'll meet our fate together!"
- Creed
w w w . d f w m e t r o . o r g / d a n a
[To reply via email, please remove my pants.]
Durango
>>
>[snipped bullshit]
>
>Tiptoe you stupid twat, don't copy that crap in your insipid reply.
>
>What a dumbfuck you are.
>
idea who Patrick Humphrey is or that this was a made up thing to smear
him. Which I assume is what it was. Or am I being a dumbfuck too? I
can handle being a dumbfuck, I've had practice, but please don't
inform me that I'm also a stupid twat cuz that would be something new
for me and I'm not in the mood for anything new right now.
Dana
Given the fact that tiptoe doesn't display more then 4 working brain cells, I'm
not sure if she knows that *this* Pat is the *same* Pat that she reads on
dfw.general ... but she reads these groups enough to know who is who I'd wager.
RDT
Very clever, but bad smear attempt on Patrick.
RDT
In article <3CCC9D6C...@verizon.net>,
--
--
"We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail"
---President George W. Bush, September 20, 2001
Dana
> I don't think there is a news bureau called API. There's UPI and AP.
>Very clever, but bad smear attempt on Patrick.
And you, just like the ignorant tiptoe, just had to post it again in your reply.
Stupid fucking prick.
Voice of Reason
> I don't think there is a news bureau called API. There's UPI and AP.
>Very clever, but bad smear attempt on Patrick.
False. And Humphrey was fired from Rice University. Just ask him
yourself.
Now what is smear is that Humphrey emailed a nine year old and told
her that her father, Don Ellis, was a sexual pervert.
Now that is one sick bastard.
--
Pat
Scott Nuzum
Voice of Reason wrote in message
<833rcu4hs8iv3hfes...@4ax.com>...
>On 29 Apr 2002 13:15:30 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
>
>> I don't think there is a news bureau called API. There's UPI and AP.
>>Very clever, but bad smear attempt on Patrick.
>
>False. And Humphrey was fired from Rice University. Just ask him
>yourself.
Try again. There is AP and UPI. There are also HNS (Harris News Service, for
newspapers owned by the Harris chain), Knight-Ridder Services (obvious
there), CP (Canadian Press) and Reuters among others. There is no API.
As for Patrick, it's for him to know and us to find out when he wishes to
let us. I don't particularly care.
(alt.revisionism? WTF?)
S.E.N.
Writes for a newspaper. Knows his agencies.
Kerri
"Anonymous" <nob...@paranoici.org> wrote in message
news:56b4fbf868e3aa60...@paranoici.org...
Cass? Is that you? :)
<snip it good>
--
He'd be out of his depth in a parking lot puddle.
Reply to snowlobster (at) cableone.net
Kerri
"Dana" <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote in message
news:m80qcuco12r4fi45v...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 03:01:24 GMT, tiptoe <tip....@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >Surprisingly, The Chronicle of Higher Ed is full of stuff like this by
higher
> >ed types. Sometimes it reads like the National Enquirer.
> >
> >Anonymous wrote:
>
> [snipped bullshit]
>
> Tiptoe you stupid twat, don't copy that crap in your insipid reply.
>
> What a dumbfuck you are.
>
OK, one point for Alma. tsk tsk tsk
--
There's gotta be a better way.
Kerri
"Voice of Reason" <voiceo...@blakely.DELETEharrogate.net> wrote absolute
shit in message news:833rcu4hs8iv3hfes...@4ax.com...
As if!!!
--
I shaved my legs for THIS?
RDT
Kerri <some...@anything.com.invalid> wrote:
>"Dana" <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote in message
>news:m80qcuco12r4fi45v...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 03:01:24 GMT, tiptoe <tip....@verizon.net> wrote:
>> >Surprisingly, The Chronicle of Higher Ed is full of stuff like this by
>higher
>> >ed types. Sometimes it reads like the National Enquirer.
>> >
>> >Anonymous wrote:
>> [snipped bullshit]
>> Tiptoe you stupid twat, don't copy that crap in your insipid reply.
>> What a dumbfuck you are.
>OK, one point for Alma. tsk tsk tsk
O, the best is yet to come. Dana is his own worst enemy.
RDT
RDT
Dana <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote:
>On 29 Apr 2002 13:15:30 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
>> I don't think there is a news bureau called API. There's UPI and AP.
>>Very clever, but bad smear attempt on Patrick.
>And you, just like the ignorant tiptoe, just had to post it again in your reply.
>Stupid fucking prick.
Projecting again, Dana?
RDT
Patrick L. Humphrey
>"Anonymous" <nob...@paranoici.org> wrote in message
>news:56b4fbf868e3aa60...@paranoici.org...
>Cass? Is that you? :)
><snip it good>
>He'd be out of his depth in a parking lot puddle.
To put it another way:
a walk through the depths of Cass' soul wouldn't get the soles of your feet
wet.
;-)
--PLH, watch him foam at the mouth at that one...if you don't have him already
killfiled, that is
Sara
<snu...@terraworld.net> wrote:
Ah, but Scott, you don't understand the "Voice of Reason," otherwise
known as "Pat Blakely." It doesn't matter WHAT _you_ know, HE knows
better.
Over in alt.revisionism, we call him the "Father of Lies," because he
is completely unable to wite a simple sentence without lying about
_something_. This week, it's Patrick Humphrey, who was neither fired,
nor arrested, nor in any way associated with the crimes the Father of
Lies has accused him of. Quite simply, the Father of Lies has taken a
newspaper clipping about someone, and replaced the name with Patrick's.
His silly "API" is his way of keeping plausible deniability later when
he's caught at it, by saying, "Oh come on! You KNEW it was false because
there's no such thing as API."
When he tried to forge my name to posts and screwed up by spelling my
ISP incorrectly, he claimed he wasn't trying to forge me because "anyone
could see that the ISP was spelled wrong."
The cross-posting is another part of his disease. He cannot help himself.
Sara
--
"Americans have different ways of saying things. They say "elevator",
we say "lift" ... they say "President", we say "stupid psychopathic git."
Alexai Sayle.
Dana
>In article <ar1rcuk5jhbqd32a2...@4ax.com>,
>Dana <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote:
>>On 29 Apr 2002 13:15:30 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
>>> I don't think there is a news bureau called API. There's UPI and AP.
>>>Very clever, but bad smear attempt on Patrick.
>>And you, just like the ignorant tiptoe, just had to post it again in your reply.
>>Stupid fucking prick.
>
> Projecting again, Dana?
And where were YOU this weekend hmmm? Saw Ken Conner, but no Ralph to stand up
to his words on Usenet. Howard, bust out the crayons and color me a nice shade
of "not surprised".
Dana
wrote:
>
>"Dana" <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote in message
>news:m80qcuco12r4fi45v...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 03:01:24 GMT, tiptoe <tip....@verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>> >Surprisingly, The Chronicle of Higher Ed is full of stuff like this by
>higher
>> >ed types. Sometimes it reads like the National Enquirer.
>> >
>> >Anonymous wrote:
>>
>> [snipped bullshit]
>>
>> Tiptoe you stupid twat, don't copy that crap in your insipid reply.
>>
>> What a dumbfuck you are.
>>
>
>OK, one point for Alma. tsk tsk tsk
What does Alma have to do with this bullshit?
Voice of Reason
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
<deletia from manic rantings>
One defender of child abuse lying another child abuser.
Fact:
Sara Salzman has been reported in two seperate states for child abuse,
Ohio and Colorado.
Fact:
Google Search: sara + salzman + lies
Explains a lot, you will dozens and dozens of her lies
Fact:
<quote>
"As the step-father of a five year old domme in training" - Charles
Tucker aka husband of Sara Salzman 4/4/1997 on alt.sadistic and
alt.torture
</quote>
Sara Salzman's husband pretty much admitting he abuses her daughter
and she allows it. Both are sexual sadist.
Fact
Sara Salzman tried to have a usenet poster investigated by the
Southern Poverty Law Center but when they discovered she was a sexual
sadist and a liar just trying to use them revenge, they laughed at her
and stopped their investigation.
Fact
Sara Salzman has said she wants to destroy the career of a Jewish
civil rights lawyer named Daylin Leach. His crime, calling her a
*crackpot* after she threatened him (which got laughed at). In manic
revenge she wrote every single newspaper in Eastern Pennsylvania about
him. Not one them would publish her libel. She has vowed to continue
to destroy the career of Daylin Leach.
Fact
Sara Salzman post sexual torture and bondage stories for little kids
to read. An example of her writings: This is when she was Sara
Schwartz before dumping that husband for the superman Aryan she brags
out. What a piece of garbage.
From: ssch...@infinet.com
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage,
Subject: My Master Holds The Ropes Just So (poem)
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 1995 14:49:12 -0500
Organization: InfiNet
Lines: 114
Message-ID: <sschwartz-050...@p21.infinet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p21.infinet.com
My Master holds the rope just so.
He knows me. Knows my moods. Knows the fear behind my eyes, both real
and
imagined.
Those eyes widen as he gently lays the rope down, as he carefully,
methodically, systematically, lays the toys down on the bed.
Soft moans escape from behind gagged lips. I have been told to watch.
To see each and know that soon each will touch me.
He looks up briefly as he lays each down on the bed. Checking
reactions.
Watching.
The short whip. A sigh.
The deerskin. The suede.
The small braided thong, the one that stings. A short moan.
The horsehair that stings but never marks.
The canes. The paddles. A pause.
I wait, knowing.
The small velvet bag that holds clamps. Clamps too severe for my
breasts, yet
applied anyway.
A gasp. And then his smile.
He knows me. He knows I will take the pain to please him. He knows the
sacrifice I make to his Gods of Pain. He sees the torment in my eyes.
The desire to please. The love. The fear of the pain.
My Master holds the rope just so.
Through his fingers, around my wrists, making delicate rings softer
than steel.
Stronger than steel. One on each wrist, a gentle bracelet that is soon
pulled
tight, stretched to the bedposts and wrapped tightly. One on each
ankle. No
matter how I tighten my muscles as he wraps the rope, still it is
perfectly
tight. The circulation moves. The ankle does not.
I lie face-up on the bed, my body a perfect X. Face up. Oh, Goddess,
he's going
to whip my breasts.
But first, two small wooden clothespins bob before my eyes. I turn my
head,
remember I am instructed to watch, turn back. The clothespins bite the
delicate
flesh of each nipple. Grasp. Sting. Burn. He waits.
My Master knows me. Knows he can whip me, clothespins and all. Knows
the pain,
where it will hurt the most, what I can and cannot take. He waits.
The burning increases as the pins are removed. Ah, he will not whip me
with
clothespins in place. But the moment when I was unsure, when the blood
pounded
in my temples and the fear covered me like a shroud, then he watched
my eyes.
The whip falls. Which one is it now? I cannot turn my head to see
which he
reaches for. But I know them all. I arch my back, try to stay still.
My Master knows me. Knows I will hold position as long as possible,
before the
pain forces me to writhe, to turn, to try in vain to shield my
breasts. Knows
the moment when I can no longer stay still. And precisely then, says
gently,
"Don't move."
My Master holds the rope just so. Gently tugging at the knots, to
release arms
and legs from bondage. Gently unwraps each wrist, each ankle. Rubs
each, and
kisses the places where the rope has left its mark. The gag is
removed. I
swallow.
"Kneel."
I crouch on the bed, head down, ass up, as he mounts the bed behind
me.
His hands caress my ass softly, then spank sharply. Slowly, quickly,
his hand
falls upon my ass. I wait for the moment, the pain/pleasure as he will
enter
me. But not yet. First a gentle tapping, soft touch, as he marks the
place the
cane will fall. I brace myself, plead with myself to hold position,
knowing
each stroke brings a fire hotter than any flame.
Five strokes. Six. I have not moved. As the pain from each begins to
subside, a
soft, half-sob. "Thank you, Master."
Eight. Nine. My knees give out, and I fall to the bed, sobbing. But
immediately
back on my knees again. "Thank you, Master."
Ten. I am aware of nothing, save the pain. And his voice, as I am
commanded to
orgasm, not from stimulation, not from his fingers or his cock, but
from pain
alone. My body responds without hesitation. My pleasure is screamed
out for his
pleasure.
Later, I will feel his cock inside me. I will feel the force as he
thrusts deep
into me, bruising the tender flesh with his strength. Later I will
come, and
come, and come, but only by his command. Later, we will lie back,
exhausted, as
he cradles me in his arms, strokes me gently, whispers in my ear.
But not yet.
Now he rises from the bed, returns to the toys so carefully laid out
before me.
My Master holds the rope just so.
It is things like this and many more why we call her Psycho Sara
--
Pat
Kerri
"Voice of Reason" <voiceo...@blakely.DELETEharrogate.net> wrote in
message news:7b1tcu41mqb6vsncg...@4ax.com...
> On 30 Apr 2002 03:01:36 GMT, Sara "The Fist" Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> <deletia from manic rantings>
<more maniac rantings snipped>
Whew! Not exactly what I was expecting to read with my morning coffee, but
hey... why not. ^5 Sara! ;-)
KJ*
--
This is why I never listen to the Voice of Reason.
Kerri
"Dana" <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote in message
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 18:50:50 -0500, "Kerri"
<some...@anything.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Dana" <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote in message
> >news:m80qcuco12r4fi45v...@4ax.com...
> >> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 03:01:24 GMT, tiptoe <tip....@verizon.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Surprisingly, The Chronicle of Higher Ed is full of stuff like this by
> >higher
> >> >ed types. Sometimes it reads like the National Enquirer.
> >> >
> >> >Anonymous wrote:
> >>
> >> [snipped bullshit]
> >>
> >> Tiptoe you stupid twat, don't copy that crap in your insipid reply.
> >>
> >> What a dumbfuck you are.
> >>
> >
> >OK, one point for Alma. tsk tsk tsk
>
>
> What does Alma have to do with this bullshit?
You attacked Tiptoe viciously. I wouldn't have responded to the post about
Patrick and left the message in there, but there's no need to call her a
stupid twat and a dumbfuck, too. Alma claims that you do that on a regular
basis, but I haven't seen you do it lately.
Oh, who cares. Do what you gotta do, Dana... but shit like that only hurts
you.
--
Sometimes silence is the best answer.
RDT
Dana <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote:
>On 29 Apr 2002 21:48:29 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
>
>>In article <ar1rcuk5jhbqd32a2...@4ax.com>,
>>Dana <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote:
>>>On 29 Apr 2002 13:15:30 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
>>>> I don't think there is a news bureau called API. There's UPI and AP.
>>>>Very clever, but bad smear attempt on Patrick.
>>>And you, just like the ignorant tiptoe, just had to post it again in your reply.
>>>Stupid fucking prick.
>> Projecting again, Dana?
>And where were YOU this weekend hmmm?
As if I owe you an explanation, you terroristic piece of shit.
Don't threaten me like you're something other than a chest-beating moron.
I, unlike Ken, am not out to fight anyone. I will report you to your ISP
if you continue the threats. If you stalk me or threaten me with violence
in person, I will call the police. If you think that your whereabouts are
not easy to ascertain, that only goes to show how little you know. As
I've said before, anyone who fights over something written in a newsgroup
has a serious problem.
The thin veneer of sanity which surrounds you is slowly coming
unglued. Even Kerri, who doesn't yet know you well, recognized the way
you degrade women using foul language that is inappropriate for any forum.
Those who've been on here longer are more aware that your treatment of
women is indicative of a fundamental problem you have with women whom you
can't control or manipulate. At this rate, you are going to ruin the good
thing you've got going with Nnickee and end up destitute like you were a
few short years ago. Cool it with the threats because they only serve to
stir up whatever demons end up destroying you.
SteveR
>
> On 29 Apr 2002 21:48:29 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
>
> >In article <ar1rcuk5jhbqd32a2...@4ax.com>,
> >Dana <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote:
> >>On 29 Apr 2002 13:15:30 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
> >>> I don't think there is a news bureau called API. There's UPI and AP.
> >>>Very clever, but bad smear attempt on Patrick.
> >>And you, just like the ignorant tiptoe, just had to post it again in your reply.
> >>Stupid fucking prick.
> >
> > Projecting again, Dana?
>
> And where were YOU this weekend hmmm? Saw Ken Conner, but no Ralph to stand up
> to his words on Usenet. Howard, bust out the crayons and color me a nice shade
> of "not surprised".
>
> --
>
Why would you be anxious to meet someone for a potential confrontation
when you have the family in tow?
Dana, if you were to completely ignore the bait and barbs tossed your
way, you'd be a much better man for it. I can't blame you for saying
STFU, and I certainly would expect you to dispute misinformation
publicly posted, but one of these days, you may meet a wacko with a
weapon, and as I've pointed out - I'd hate to see your kids visiting
your gravesite yearly due to supposedly stained honor on usenet.
Think of the possible cost vs. the reward. My humble suggestion is to
counter whatever crap people throw at you with the argumentative skills
you possess. They can't shoot you via email.
RDT
Maybe I misjudged you :) Good job.
RDT
In article <3CCEAD70...@attbi.com>, SteveR <txdr...@attbi.com> wrote:
>Why would you be anxious to meet someone for a potential confrontation
>when you have the family in tow?
>Dana, if you were to completely ignore the bait and barbs tossed your
>way, you'd be a much better man for it. I can't blame you for saying
>STFU, and I certainly would expect you to dispute misinformation
>publicly posted, but one of these days, you may meet a wacko with a
>weapon, and as I've pointed out - I'd hate to see your kids visiting
>your gravesite yearly due to supposedly stained honor on usenet.
>
>Think of the possible cost vs. the reward. My humble suggestion is to
>counter whatever crap people throw at you with the argumentative skills
>you possess. They can't shoot you via email.
--
Dana
wrote:
>> What does Alma have to do with this bullshit?
>You attacked Tiptoe viciously.
Yeah, and, so?
>I wouldn't have responded to the post about
>Patrick and left the message in there, but there's no need to call her a
>stupid twat and a dumbfuck, too.
Bet ya she got the message.
>Alma claims that you do that on a regular
>basis, but I haven't seen you do it lately.
If someone spreads a false rumor about you, Kerri, you can bet your ass I'll do
the same damn thing.
>Oh, who cares. Do what you gotta do, Dana... but shit like that only hurts
>you.
No it doesn't.
Dana
>In article <ac7scucqve9q9j0b0...@4ax.com>,
>Dana <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote:
>>On 29 Apr 2002 21:48:29 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
>>
>>>In article <ar1rcuk5jhbqd32a2...@4ax.com>,
>>>Dana <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote:
>>>>On 29 Apr 2002 13:15:30 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
>>>>> I don't think there is a news bureau called API. There's UPI and AP.
>>>>>Very clever, but bad smear attempt on Patrick.
>>>>And you, just like the ignorant tiptoe, just had to post it again in your reply.
>>>>Stupid fucking prick.
>>> Projecting again, Dana?
>>And where were YOU this weekend hmmm?
>As if I owe you an explanation, you terroristic piece of shit.
Ralph, you putz, you started this whole series of threads. What a complete
moron.
>Don't threaten me like you're something other than a chest-beating moron.
>I, unlike Ken, am not out to fight anyone. I will report you to your ISP
>if you continue the threats.
I haven't threatened you yet, stupid idiot.
>If you stalk me or threaten me with violence in person, I will call the police.
Have fun in your delusion.
Your little ICQ exchange, which you initiated, could be viewed as you trying to
determine my whereabouts this past weekend, especially tied in to your post
where you said "I just wanted to know if you were going (to Scarborough Faire)
this weekend."
Call the cops. They need a chuckle.
>If you think that your whereabouts are not easy to ascertain, that only goes to show how little you know.
Who's stalking who?
>As I've said before, anyone who fights over something written in a newsgroup
>has a serious problem.
I see no difference between a local newsgroup and the telephone.
>The thin veneer of sanity which surrounds you is slowly coming
>unglued. Even Kerri, who doesn't yet know you well, recognized the way
>you degrade women using foul language that is inappropriate for any forum.
"pigfuck"
"terroristic piece of shit."
etc.
You have quite the way with words yourself, Mr. Pot-bellied Black Kettle
Shut the fuck up and sit down.
>Those who've been on here longer are more aware that your treatment of
>women is indicative of a fundamental problem you have with women whom you
>can't control or manipulate.
Say, isn't that why Donisa dumped you? ROFL
>At this rate, you are going to ruin the good thing you've got going with Nnickee and end up destitute like you were a
>few short years ago.
How do you figure? She and I are "like peas and carrots." You don't have a
clue as to what you're mouthing off about son.
>Cool it with the threats because they only serve to
>stir up whatever demons end up destroying you.
When I make a threat I'll be sure to type it out in all caps so you can read it
to my ISP clearly.
You're a buffoon.
Dana
>Dana wrote:
>>
>> On 29 Apr 2002 21:48:29 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
>>
>> >In article <ar1rcuk5jhbqd32a2...@4ax.com>,
>> >Dana <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote:
>> >>On 29 Apr 2002 13:15:30 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
>> >>> I don't think there is a news bureau called API. There's UPI and AP.
>> >>>Very clever, but bad smear attempt on Patrick.
>> >>And you, just like the ignorant tiptoe, just had to post it again in your reply.
>> >>Stupid fucking prick.
>> >
>> > Projecting again, Dana?
>>
>> And where were YOU this weekend hmmm? Saw Ken Conner, but no Ralph to stand up
>> to his words on Usenet. Howard, bust out the crayons and color me a nice shade
>> of "not surprised".
>Why would you be anxious to meet someone for a potential confrontation
>when you have the family in tow?
My wife made me promise, "no fights" if Ralph showed up. : )
She's a good woman.
>Dana, if you were to completely ignore the bait and barbs tossed your
>way, you'd be a much better man for it.
Yeah, I know.
>I can't blame you for saying STFU, and I certainly would expect you to dispute misinformation
>publicly posted, but one of these days, you may meet a wacko with a
>weapon, and as I've pointed out - I'd hate to see your kids visiting
>your gravesite yearly due to supposedly stained honor on usenet.
I hear ya.
>Think of the possible cost vs. the reward. My humble suggestion is to
>counter whatever crap people throw at you with the argumentative skills
>you possess. They can't shoot you via email.
I'd prefer to keep it here on the groups. My Inbox is full enough these days.
Heheh : )
RDT
Dana <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote:
>Call the cops. They need a chuckle.
What makes you think I haven't?
>When I make a threat I'll be sure to type it out in all caps so you can read it
>to my ISP clearly.
Duly noted.
Scott Nuzum
Voice of Reason wrote in message
This post is off topic in MTR. Please contribute to the newsgroup by posting
about only approved subjects. If you have any questions, please see the FAQ.
S.E.N.
Why do I bother?
Donisa
I think Steve makes a lot of sense. I am not taking sides nor do I wish to
start a fight. But you need to be careful. What if Ken had gone and had a
few drinks before he met you? What if he had a gun. I know you think
you're great enough to fight your way out of it but what if he had shot
Paul? (You might want to think about this Paul before you do any more
stupid stuff.) What if he had shot one of the other people? Would you be
able to live with yourself?
Personally I don't care what you do. I don't care if you risk your life for
this stupid NG. It's not my life on the line and I won't be affected by it
at all. But I'd hate to see someone ruin their life by shooting you. And
I'd hate to see your kids without a father. Or Nnickee without a husband.
So you beat up a fat guy. Next time they might have a weapon. Think
carefully before you threaten.
And btw, get your gossip correct.
Donisa
"Dana" <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote in message
news:1fhtcug4ja376h3qv...@4ax.com...
Dana
>Dana,
>
>I think Steve makes a lot of sense. I am not taking sides nor do I wish to
>start a fight.
Then be quiet.
[snipped stuff that can happen any time you step foot out of your house]
>Personally I don't care what you do. I don't care if you risk your life for
>this stupid NG. It's not my life on the line and I won't be affected by it
>at all.
Then why comment?
>But I'd hate to see someone ruin their life by shooting you.
"nor do I wish to start a fight."
Bullshit.
>And I'd hate to see your kids without a father.
Like yours?
>Or Nnickee without a husband.
Like you?
>So you beat up a fat guy. Next time they might have a weapon. Think
>carefully before you threaten.
Pipe down, tubby.
>And btw, get your gossip correct.
Assuming you didn't lie, it's correct.
Donisa
insult someone who has a brother with a gun.
"Dana" <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote in message
news:o0ducuce3vsq847pb...@4ax.com...
Jer
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:44:28 -0500, "Kerri" <some...@anything.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>
> >Oh, who cares. Do what you gotta do, Dana... but shit like that only hurts
> >you.
>
> No it doesn't.
Yeah, it does, too - but I don't expect you to notice the damage until
it's too late for you to do anything about it.
--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'
ICQ = 35253273
"All that we do is touched with ocean,
yet we remain on the shore of what we know."
- Richard Wilbur
http://JerDun.airweb.net
http://www.seahoss.com
http://www.reefkeeper.org
http://www.oceanfutures.com
http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org
"WHAT? NO OCEAN? - Then we are NOT going!"
Divers do it deeper.... I'd rather be diving.
\~=~=~=~=~---------~=~=~=~~----------~=~=~=~~
O
<o((((((((>{ O
<o((((((((>{
0 <o((((((((>{
o
o
[:])
Durango
wrote:
>
>Dana it's this kinda behavior that's one day gonna get you killed when you
>insult someone who has a brother with a gun.
>
once. And be on the look out for a deranged brother with a gun.
RDT
Durango <dur...@durangowashington.com> wrote:
>And be on the look out for a deranged brother with a gun.
I knew you were African-American.
Durango
Donisa
"Durango" <dur...@durangowashington.com> wrote in message
news:3ccf4d15...@news.charter.net...
You know I knew someone would say that as soon as I posted this. But my
brother is pretty safe. He's a minister and as non violent as you can get.
He has three beautiful kids and would protect them with his life. He'd
never do ANYTHING to put them in danger. He's definitely not stupid.
Dana
>Dana wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:44:28 -0500, "Kerri" <some...@anything.com.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>[....]
>>
>> >Oh, who cares. Do what you gotta do, Dana... but shit like that only hurts
>> >you.
>>
>> No it doesn't.
>Yeah, it does, too - but I don't expect you to notice the damage until
>it's too late for you to do anything about it.
Alright Marineboy, suppose you explain it to me?
Dana
>Dana it's this kinda behavior that's one day gonna get you killed when you
>insult someone who has a brother with a gun.
And who's to say I'm not packin' heat myself?
Think before you speak.
Donisa
"Dana" <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote in message
news:5emucu0qmensrstk3...@4ax.com...
Durango
wrote:
>
>You know I knew someone would say that as soon as I posted this. But my
>brother is pretty safe. He's a minister and as non violent as you can get.
>He has three beautiful kids and would protect them with his life. He'd
>never do ANYTHING to put them in danger. He's definitely not stupid.
>
exactly how safe this brother of yours is, as in he is 'pretty' safe.
Not completely safe, not absolutely safe, but 'pretty' safe. So, what
I'm hearing you say here is that to keep on the safe side Dana should
keep an eye out for your brother cuz there's a chance he's coming
gunning for him. Maybe just for safety sake you might kindly detail
your entire family of cohorts. Near as I remember we've got the
militant lesbian grandparents, the crazed lawyer parental unit, the
ultra religious mama, 2 or 3 ex-husbands either with records or
currently doing time, 87 ex-boyfriends all with varying degrees of
psycho-mess-ness, and who knows who else who you might be able to
recruit in this never ending vendetta against that saintly paragon of
patience known as Dana. But this brother, this not too safe,
supposedly non-violent minister, sounds like the number one threat.
Unless those militant lesbian grandmothers are on the prowl.....
Dana
Shut up sow.
You post an oblique threat that you have a brother with a gun who would be
willing to kill me for my behavior. Bring him on. Or else shut up and sit
down.
*laughing at you*
Durango
<Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote:
>
>Shut up sow.
>
Dana, try to keep your farm animals properly named. You've long had
this particular individual catalogued in the bovine family and now
you've moved her to the porcine. You can't cross species like that. It
is too confusing.
RDT
Now I know what Dana means when he says you've out of the closet for
several years. Thanks for the clarification.
Durango
>
> Now I know what Dana means when he says you've out of the closet for
>several years. Thanks for the clarification.
>
stimulating to have a mind that is always producing such original
thoughts! And so much fresh material.
RDT
Durango <dur...@durangowashington.com> wrote:
>militant lesbian grandparents
I've never heard this before on the newsgroup. How did you know they
were militant lesbians? Did one reject you for a date and you developed a
complex? Is that why you seem to have a burning hatred for women?
RDT
Durango <dur...@durangowashington.com> wrote:
>Do you get a lotta compliments about how witty you are?
Why yes I do. I often sell collections of my works. Just check your
local Goodwill or Salvation Army.
Durango
>
> I've never heard this before on the newsgroup. How did you know they
>were militant lesbians?
>
>
> Did one reject you for a date and you developed a
>complex?
>
>
> Is that why you seem to have a burning hatred for women?
>
(does anyone else notice how self-revealing this boy is in some of
the things he writes? It's kind of embarrassing. In an amusing sorta
way...)
Jer
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 20:33:56 -0500, Jer <gd...@airmail.ten> wrote:
>
> >Dana wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:44:28 -0500, "Kerri" <some...@anything.com.invalid>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >[....]
> >>
> >> >Oh, who cares. Do what you gotta do, Dana... but shit like that only hurts
> >> >you.
> >>
> >> No it doesn't.
>
> >Yeah, it does, too - but I don't expect you to notice the damage until
> >it's too late for you to do anything about it.
>
> Alright Marineboy, suppose you explain it to me?
Okay, I'll bite. Etiquette is a word that doesn't seem to exist in your
vocabulary. From my strictly personal observations, you seem to have a
short temper, and you let your mouth have too much freedom. I'm not
saying you don't deserve to have an opinion, we all do, but your
apparent need to have yours heard overwhelms anyone that may care to
know it, and makes you look desperate to get attention from whomever may
have proffered a moment of their time. I believe your rude behaviour is
intentional and it regularly includes a rush to judgment about anyone
whom you consider a target, often resorting to a level of name-calling
only an school yard bully would admire. You seem to think it makes you
look witty, but my perception sees boorish. Neither of us is here to
win a popularity contest, but it seems only one of us cares about the
feelings of others. You also may wonder why this is the only post I'll
make in this regard, but rest assured, you already know the answer.
Jer
It's always the one nobody would've suspected.
Donisa
How adult and how nicely put. Thanks for being a voice of sanity.
Donisa
Who always knew you had class.
"Jer" <gd...@airmail.ten> wrote in message
news:313CA92B838FEBC0.1D800294...@lp.airnews.net...
RDT
Durango <dur...@durangowashington.com> wrote:
>On 30 Apr 2002 23:38:58 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
>> I've never heard this before on the newsgroup. How did you know they
>>were militant lesbians?
>Their granddaughter told me.
Their granddaughter told you they were militant lesbians? Did they
march on San Francisco perched on the back of Harleys?
>> Did one reject you for a date and you developed a
>>complex?
>Yes.
>> Is that why you seem to have a burning hatred for women?
>Yes.
Good, I was afraid the anal love you've exhibited for Dana thus far
was the result of childhood abuse. It is good to know you're just a
misogynistic prick instead.
Dana
>In article <3ccf4e52...@news.charter.net>,
>Durango <dur...@durangowashington.com> wrote:
>>On 30 Apr 2002 21:57:33 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
>>> I knew you were African-American.
>>It's not like I've kept this a secret....
>
> Now I know what Dana means when he says you've out of the closet for
>several years. Thanks for the clarification.
Where did I say that Ralph? Cite.
Otherwise fuck off.
Dana
No no no no.... that's "A pig and an elephant's DNA just won't splice." - Chef
Dana
>Dana wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 20:33:56 -0500, Jer <gd...@airmail.ten> wrote:
>>
>> >Dana wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:44:28 -0500, "Kerri" <some...@anything.com.invalid>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >[....]
>> >>
>> >> >Oh, who cares. Do what you gotta do, Dana... but shit like that only hurts
>> >> >you.
>> >>
>> >> No it doesn't.
>>
>> >Yeah, it does, too - but I don't expect you to notice the damage until
>> >it's too late for you to do anything about it.
>>
>> Alright Marineboy, suppose you explain it to me?
>
>
>Okay, I'll bite. Etiquette is a word that doesn't seem to exist in your
>vocabulary. From my strictly personal observations, you seem to have a
>short temper, and you let your mouth have too much freedom.
" Good, I was afraid the anal love you've exhibited for Dana thus far
was the result of childhood abuse. It is good to know you're just a
misogynistic prick instead."
RDT
********************************
>I'm not saying you don't deserve to have an opinion, we all do, but your
>apparent need to have yours heard overwhelms anyone that may care to
>know it, and makes you look desperate to get attention from whomever may
>have proffered a moment of their time.
Awww Jerry.... you still sore because I pointed out your ecological hypocricy?
I'm sorry. That was very mean of me to do that.
>I believe your rude behaviour is intentional and it regularly includes a rush to judgment about anyone
>whom you consider a target, often resorting to a level of name-calling
>only an school yard bully would admire.
Guess what Jerry? News flash!
When you see me being rude, you can rest assured I meant to be rude. Let there
be no more guessing on your part.
As for the name-calling, I'm hardly alone. I'm just the best at it.
>You seem to think it makes you look witty, but my perception sees boorish.
And likewise you think your pretentiousness about all things "mother Earth" make
you look cool, but to me you're the goofball that scolds parents on the beach
for allowing their children to collect seashells, thereby "upsetting the
delicate balance that is the marine habitat".
(Never will stop laughing about that one.)
>Neither of us is here to win a popularity contest, but it seems only one of us cares about the
>feelings of others.
Oh really? I care about other people's feelings. I care about Patrick's. I
care about Steve's and Durango's and Tim's and Mark's. I care about many
people, particularly the ones who don't make it a daily hobby to talk shit to
me. I could give a rat's ass about Ralph's or Donisa's. So you're half right.
(which makes you equally wrong.)
>You also may wonder why this is the only post I'll
>make in this regard, but rest assured, you already know the answer.
I see you in another part of this thread. You already blew that one.
Dana
>It's always the one nobody would've suspected.
Peek-a-boo! I see you!
Dana
> (does anyone else notice how self-revealing this boy is in some of
>the things he writes? It's kind of embarrassing. In an amusing sorta
>way...)
Anyone who disagrees with Ralph hates women. It's in the rules. : /
Dana
>Is that why you seem to have a burning hatred for women?
Some would say that anyone who supports prostitution hates women and wants them
all to be free to be the whores they really are.
RDT
Dana <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote:
>On 30 Apr 2002 23:38:58 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") wrote:
>>Is that why you seem to have a burning hatred for women?
>Some would say that anyone who supports prostitution hates women and wants them
>all to be free to be the whores they really are.
It's interesting that you would bring that topic up when you were the
one who said I overplayed it. But thank you for bringing it back up.
Prostitution is a choice women currently cannot legally make in this
society. How you would construe legalizing a woman's choices to be hatred
of women is beyond me.
Victor
> As for the name-calling, I'm hardly alone. I'm just the best at it.
>
>
"HHHMMMMMMMMmmmmmmm now I wouldn't say that......"
You just wait till have my knickers in a twist...... you will see some
really creative stuff.
Victor
Victor
> >the things he writes? It's kind of embarrassing. In an amusing sorta
> >way...)
>
>
> Anyone who disagrees with Ralph hates women. It's in the rules. : /
>
>
no no.... so far I am just a rabid dog..... I have yet to terrorize the fair
sex.... unless of course any of the ladies happen to have some extra time on
their hands.....
Victor
Durango
>
> Good, I was afraid the anal love you've exhibited for Dana thus far
>was the result of childhood abuse. It is good to know you're just a
>misogynistic prick instead.
>
be a very angry little boy. With a sadly twisted lacking in the
imagination department. Were you actually abused as a child in
addition to all your other problems? Have you not lived up to your
daddy's expectations? Big disapointment to him? Is that yet one more
thing that makes you angry? One more rejection? From what I've been
told by females in this group who have experienced you over time it is
you who has a hatred of woman. And they of you. Apparently you have
long had a problem with women, likely going back to whenever you first
realized that other guys seemed able to attract them, while they were
repulsed by you. Is that the real thing which makes you so angry at
Dana? That this guy you claim to find so lacking has been able to
attract good-looking women, at times even marrying them. While,
apparently you are a very homely, some have said ugly, fat guy and you
blame this for your problems with women. Unable to attract attractive
woman, due to your own physical problems amd due to your severe
personality problems you resort to paying woman to pretend not to be
repulsed by you as that is your only available outlet except for the
occasional woman who is even less attractive than you and thus you are
able, for a time, until your personality repulses even them to have a
semblance of a relationship for which you've not had to pay up front.
Is that a fairly accurate profile? Or have people misled me? And poll
of the NG females. Who do you think has a problem with woman? Me or
this RDT person? (Donisa is excluded from this poll)
Gar
inspired to scribe:
> It's interesting that you would bring that topic up when you were the
>one who said I overplayed it. But thank you for bringing it back up.
>Prostitution is a choice women currently cannot legally make in this
>society. How you would construe legalizing a woman's choices to be hatred
>of women is beyond me.
You lost me. Do men have a choice? I want to be a prostitute.
_______________________________________
Gar
"Just pretend it's Sunday and accept it."
RDT
Gar <g_fra...@hotmAaBiCl.com> wrote:
>On 1 May 2002 01:25:55 -0400, ta...@panix.com ("RDT") was divinely
>inspired to scribe:
>> It's interesting that you would bring that topic up when you were the
>>one who said I overplayed it. But thank you for bringing it back up.
>>Prostitution is a choice women currently cannot legally make in this
>>society. How you would construe legalizing a woman's choices to be hatred
>>of women is beyond me.
>You lost me. Do men have a choice? I want to be a prostitute.
If prostitution were legal, it would be legal for both sexes.
Gar
<Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> was divinely inspired to scribe:
>
>Some would say that anyone who supports prostitution hates women and wants them
>all to be free to be the whores they really are.
I want to be a prostitute.
Durango
>>No no no no.... that's "A pig and an elephant's DNA just won't splice." - Chef
>
in the mood? And there was an awful pig squeal and look of horror on
the kid's faces? Why am I thinking with just a slight adjustment this
imagery works for...well, you know...
Durango
wrote:
>
>I want to be a prostitute.
>
time over in Amsterdam? Is that why you've been so long missing from
this NG? I'm the only regular in this NG who never seems to leave...
Well. Since you've been exiiled in Amsterdam, apparently caught up in
some sorta sleazy assignation with a Hungarian Stripper (must be true,
I read it here...) nothing much has happened here. Sonny Pro Bono
tried to eliminate that annoying Dana bastard from this NG by finally
giving Dana the beating he has so long obviously deserved. But to the
shock of everyone, somehow that lard ass Dana managed to get the best
of the obviously much more fit Sonny PB. Must have something to do
with Dana's military training. With the absence of Sonny Pro Bono
there really is no one left with a sterling wit and a tart tongue.
That RDT person has tried to fill the void, but he is just no Sonny
Pro Bono, even though he really does make a sincere effort. But then
he has been distracted by a sizzling affair with Donisa. What a lucky
guy. Everyone is quite envious of his way with women. Snags one hottie
after another. Don't know how he does it. Must have something to with
his good looks, charming personality and impressive intellect. Anyway,
I don't now if you are posting from Europe or are stateside, but it
was nice to see your name appear again...do you have any pix of that
stripper? I heard that you did....
Kerri
"Dana" <Lord...@dallascowboysPANTS.com> wrote in message
news:ocgtcukbmt4kihu9q...@4ax.com...
<snip>
>
> If someone spreads a false rumor about you, Kerri, you can bet your ass
I'll do
> the same damn thing.
Thanks, Dana. I appreciate that, I would definitely not want you to be in
the "other corner" of the ring. I guess what I'm saying is go easy on
stupid twats and dumbfucks. I'm one of them, too. Aren't we -all-
sometimes? :/
KJ*
--
Don't play dumb with me, I'm better at it.
Reply to snowlobster (at) cableone.net
Donisa
"Durango" <dur...@durangowashington.com> wrote in message
> And poll of the NG females. Who do you think has a problem with woman? Me
or
> this RDT person? (Donisa is excluded from this poll)
I think a poll is definitely in order. Yes, most definitely. I believe we
should start with the basics in this poll. Ok, everyone get ready.....
Is it correct to put the toilet paper on top or on bottom when putting it on
the little roll?
Everyone please vote. Except Durango who is excluded.
Donisa
Kerri
"Donisa" <dul...@ticnet.com> wrote in message
news:ud29217...@corp.supernews.com...
RDT has the problem.
I don't know if it's correct or not, but definitely the toilet paper rolls
from the bottom much easier, therefore that's the way I like it.
And here's another thing. When I put sheets on the bed, I face the printed
(or pretty side) of the sheet to the bottom sheet. This drives my kids
crazy. But when I get in bed, I want to see the pattern, or if it turn it
down, it shows the pretty side. Your turn.
KJ*
--
There are two kinds of drivers; those who make dust & those who eat it.
Diva
> "Donisa" <dul...@ticnet.com> wrote in message
> news:ud29217...@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> > "Durango" <dur...@durangowashington.com> wrote in message
> >
> > > And poll of the NG females. Who do you think has a problem with woman?
> Me
> > or
> > > this RDT person? (Donisa is excluded from this poll)
> >
> > I think a poll is definitely in order. Yes, most definitely. I believe
> we
> > should start with the basics in this poll. Ok, everyone get ready.....
> >
> > Is it correct to put the toilet paper on top or on bottom when putting it
> on
> > the little roll?
> >
> > Everyone please vote. Except Durango who is excluded.
>
> RDT has the problem.
>
> I don't know if it's correct or not, but definitely the toilet paper rolls
> from the bottom much easier, therefore that's the way I like it.
>
> And here's another thing. When I put sheets on the bed, I face the printed
> (or pretty side) of the sheet to the bottom sheet. This drives my kids
> crazy. But when I get in bed, I want to see the pattern, or if it turn it
> down, it shows the pretty side. Your turn.
Durango has the problem (sorry, Durango, you need to be at more GTGs).
Toilet paper should go over the top 'cause sometimes I'm in a hurry and I like
to see that baby spin.
Bed sheets - pretty side of both sheets should be the same (I don't turn the
top sheet down or use bedskirts because of insects - I'll tell you my scorpion
story sometime...)
~Diva
Howard S Shubs
"Donisa" <dul...@ticnet.com> wrote:
> Is it correct to put the toilet paper on top or on bottom when putting it on
> the little roll?
Top, definitely. Unless you have a cat who is easily amused.
--
Howard S Shubs
"Run in circles, scream and shout!" "I hope you have good backups!"
Aren't there any networked SJFs around?
rbe...@snotmail.com
>Is it correct to put the toilet paper on top or on bottom when putting it
>on the little roll?
Over the top, unless you have young kittens in the house.
This was hashed over for a month in Dear Abby or one of those columns a
few years back... They even got a letter from the president of Charmin if
I remember correctly. If there's a print or a pattern, it's on the
outside, and that should be proudly displayed on the top. Check any hotel
for the confirmation.
If you put it in the other way, it makes it harder for the kitty to unroll
the whole thing though. You just end up with a few clawed-up layers which
you can easily remove. :-)
-Ron
rbe...@snotmail.com
>I don't know if it's correct or not, but definitely the toilet paper
>rolls from the bottom much easier, therefore that's the way I like it.
You pompous, stuck-up, snotnosed, giant twerp, scumbag...
D'oh! "And another thing..."
>And here's another thing. When I put sheets on the bed, I face the
>printed (or pretty side) of the sheet to the bottom sheet. This drives
>my kids crazy. But when I get in bed, I want to see the pattern, or if
>it turn it down, it shows the pretty side. Your turn.
Well, at least you got that one right. :-)
-Ron
RDT
>the little roll?
It should face out (on top).
>Everyone please vote. Except Durango who is excluded.
He won't vote anyway. He and Dana have their He-Man Woman Hater's
Club to run.
RDT
Kerri <some...@anything.com.invalid> wrote:
>RDT has the problem.
Probably. Can't trust that guy.
Looks like the Durango team is ahead this round. We shall see...
RDT
>Durango has the problem (sorry, Durango, you need to be at more GTGs).
Nice. I like this Diva person.
Looks like we have a dead heat now. Any more females want to weigh
in on the contest between:
The Durango boob:
* Hates Donisa and makes regular disparaging remarks about her family and
her weight
* Supports Dana in his classy campaign to call women who disagree with
him "cunts" and "sows"
The RDT boob:
* Thinks hookers should be legal (which obviously indicates his deep
hatred of women)
* Probably hasn't had a date since at least first grade (OK, I made that
up)
as Misogynist of the Quarter? (Dana has already gotten misogynist of the
millenium. I think he keeps the plaque next to his Hillary Clinton voodoo
doll.)
Jer
I don't really care how the paper roll is poised for action, just so
long as it is. But what's with the colours? Why does toilet paper only
come in pastels? where's navy blue? hot pink? crimson red? midnight
black? forest green? Stripes? Is there some legal statute involved
with this? maybe a congressional decree remaining from the days before
indoor plumbing?
--
jer
email reply - I am not a 'ten'
ICQ = 35253273
"All that we do is touched with ocean,
yet we remain on the shore of what we know."
- Richard Wilbur
http://JerDun.airweb.net
http://www.seahoss.com
http://www.reefkeeper.org
http://www.oceanfutures.com
http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org
"WHAT? NO OCEAN? - Then we are NOT going!"
Divers do it deeper.... I'd rather be diving.
\~=~=~=~=~---------~=~=~=~~----------~=~=~=~~
O
<o((((((((>{ O
<o((((((((>{
0 <o((((((((>{
o
o
[:])
Kerri
<rbe...@snotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3cd13838$2$eorzvf$mr2...@news.dallas.sbcglobal.net...
> On 05/02/02 at 06:57AM, "Kerri" <some...@anything.com.invalid> said:
>
> >I don't know if it's correct or not, but definitely the toilet paper
> >rolls from the bottom much easier, therefore that's the way I like it.
>
> You pompous, stuck-up, snotnosed, giant twerp, scumbag...
That's it. Show me the jell-o pit. -Ron needs a draggin'.
BTW, what are you doing with your fingers in my nose?
KJ*
--
"I've known sheep that could outwit you!"
Jer
>
>
> Durango has the problem (sorry, Durango, you need to be at more GTGs).
>
> Toilet paper should go over the top 'cause sometimes I'm in a hurry and I like
> to see that baby spin.
>
> Bed sheets - pretty side of both sheets should be the same (I don't turn the
> top sheet down or use bedskirts because of insects - I'll tell you my scorpion
> story sometime...)
>
> ~Diva
Back in my pet tarantula days, bed linens were considered risky
business. Leaving the cage door open was a jailable offence. And
leaving your shoes on the floor was a no-no.
But since then, there have been times when matching sheet tops and
bottoms just wasn't an issue that required the immediate attention of
the maid - geometric blocks on top and tigers on bottom (or maybe I've
got that backwards), but at least the pillows matched. Anyway, bedtime
was often a surprise.
Jer
>
> On 05/02/02 at 06:34AM, "Donisa" <dul...@ticnet.com> said:
>
> >Is it correct to put the toilet paper on top or on bottom when putting it
> >on the little roll?
>
> Over the top, unless you have young kittens in the house.
>
> This was hashed over for a month in Dear Abby or one of those columns a
> few years back... They even got a letter from the president of Charmin if
> I remember correctly. If there's a print or a pattern, it's on the
> outside, and that should be proudly displayed on the top. Check any hotel
> for the confirmation.
I just did, and the bathroom evidence is a split decision - one's over
the top and the other is, uh... well... I don't know what that other one
is.
>
> If you put it in the other way, it makes it harder for the kitty to unroll
> the whole thing though. You just end up with a few clawed-up layers which
> you can easily remove. :-)
>
> -Ron
--
rbe...@snotmail.com
>> You pompous, stuck-up, snotnosed, giant twerp, scumbag...
>That's it. Show me the jell-o pit. -Ron needs a draggin'.
Lime jello, please.
>BTW, what are you doing with your fingers in my nose?
Just trying to touch everything. :-)
>"I've known sheep that could outwit you!"
"Calling you stupid would be an insult to stupid people."
-Ron
Durango
>
>* Hates Donisa and makes regular disparaging remarks about her family and
>her weight
>
females? Are you saying that contact with Donisa turns males into
female haters? Is that what your experience was? And for the record, I
don't hate the girl. I sorta feel sorry for her. And I never said a
disparaging word about her until I experienced her dark side. You
really don't want me elaborating on that as it would erupt into
Donisagate III. No ones wants that.
>
>* Supports Dana in his classy campaign to call women who disagree with
>him "cunts" and "sows"
>
all the stupid things you say? That you just don't quite understand
what you read? If anything I've more than once verbalized my distaste
for Dana's choice of verbiage. And I find you equally repugnant in
that regard. Though you seem to be totally ignorant of your hypocrisy
about this and the irony of so much of what you say. It's like you
don't even read or understand your own words.
>
>* Thinks hookers should be legal (which obviously indicates his deep
>hatred of women)
>
she so desired that would be one thing. But when women turn to this
out of desperation and are then exploited by people like you for their
own selfish needs with no regards for the woman as being anything more
than an object for your own pleasure, well, I would say that that is
definitely the mindset of a person who does not respect women, and
likely the mindset of a person who at heart does have a deep hatred of
women. And I do think that your fixation on this is rooted in your own
deep insecurities due to the problems you've always had with women due
to your own shortcomings.
>
>as Misogynist of the Quarter? (Dana has already gotten misogynist of the
>millenium. I think he keeps the plaque next to his Hillary Clinton voodoo
>doll.)
>
also learn misanthrope? Did your therapist use these words with you?
Durango
>
>Durango has the problem (sorry, Durango, you need to be at more GTGs).
>
to say I have a bigger problem with women than RDT? I'm sure you must
have misunderstood what was being polled here! Anyway, how many of
these GTG things would I have to go to to change your vote?
SteveR
Top. This goes for paper towels as well. Otherwise, the decorative
pattern won't show.
Durango
<some...@anything.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>And here's another thing. When I put sheets on the bed, I face the printed
>(or pretty side) of the sheet to the bottom sheet. This drives my kids
>crazy. But when I get in bed, I want to see the pattern, or if it turn it
>down, it shows the pretty side. Your turn.
>
issue. But this other issue you've raised is more vexing and I'm glad
to learn I'm not the only one who have been vexed by this conundrum
regarding sheets. I never suffered this dilemna when they were one
solid color. But then these patterned things showed up with no
instructions as to what was up or down. I opted out for the same
solution you did as that was the one that made sense, or seemed to.
gtrgrrrl
news:howard-3B39F0....@enews.newsguy.com...
> In article <ud29217...@corp.supernews.com>,
> "Donisa" <dul...@ticnet.com> wrote:
>
> > Is it correct to put the toilet paper on top or on bottom when putting
it on
> > the little roll?
>
> Top, definitely. Unless you have a cat who is easily amused.
>
Selena thinks hung toilet paper is a cat toy. I wish I could tell you just
how many times I've walked in on this funny cat busily unrolling the toilet
paper.
gtrgrrrl
news:aare1b$od1$1...@panix3.panix.com...
> In article <3CD130A4...@ticnet.com>, Diva <di...@ticnet.com> wrote:
> >Durango has the problem (sorry, Durango, you need to be at more GTGs).
>
> Nice. I like this Diva person.
>
> Looks like we have a dead heat now. Any more females want to weigh
> in on the contest between:
>
> The Durango boob:
>
> * Hates Donisa and makes regular disparaging remarks about her family and
> her weight
> * Supports Dana in his classy campaign to call women who disagree with
> him "cunts" and "sows"
>
> The RDT boob:
>
> * Thinks hookers should be legal (which obviously indicates his deep
> hatred of women)
> * Probably hasn't had a date since at least first grade (OK, I made that
> up)
>
> as Misogynist of the Quarter? (Dana has already gotten misogynist of the
> millenium. I think he keeps the plaque next to his Hillary Clinton voodoo
> doll.)
>
Clearly......Durango., by the choice of his affiliation. Donisa in no way
deserves the bad-mouthing he's been doing. He reappeared from nowhere
only to bring nastiness to this group. His lack of judgement in who he
chooses to affiliate himself with speaks for itself. He has
problems....and not just with women.
RDT has only made comments on issues he wishes to discuss. He has the right
to his opinion whether I agree with him or not. Somestimes I do agree.
gtrgrrrl
Sorry, Durango. My experience with you is that you came of out nowhere,
automatically sided with Dana and said quite awful things to/about me and we
had no quarrel. I didn't even know you existed and my first encounter with
you was nasty. You assumed Dana's quarrel with me. You had no contact with
me prior and really had no reason to be nasty on a one to one basis to me at
all. But you wanted to please Dana and made me your target. You're not a
very nice person at all. I have to go with Donisa on this one.
gtrgrrrl
news:613D339C2DD1DF2B.67680FB2...@lp.airnews.net...
> Diva wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > Durango has the problem (sorry, Durango, you need to be at more GTGs).
> business. Leaving the cage door open was a jailable offence. And
> leaving your shoes on the floor was a no-no.
>
I caught a tarantula once. Kept it in an aquarium then let it go again.
Boy, those things sure do pee alot!
Durango
wrote:
>
>
>Sorry, Durango. My experience with you is that you came of out nowhere,
>automatically sided with Dana and said quite awful things to/about me and we
>had no quarrel. I didn't even know you existed and my first encounter with
>you was nasty.
>
you. Certainly don't remember being nasty. Sorry though if you thought
me nasty. But I'm experiencing you as being a bit nasty right now, so
I guess nastiness is in the eye of the beholder...
>
> You assumed Dana's quarrel with me. You had no contact with
>me prior and really had no reason to be nasty on a one to one basis to me at
>all.
>
> But you wanted to please Dana and made me your target. You're not a
>very nice person at all.
>
what would seem to be nothing, at least to my recollection.
> I have to go with Donisa on this one.
>
I took her to a GTG which erupted into a scandal known as Donisagate.
I've got volumes of Donisa email and multiple IM converations. And
your Donisa experience has been what? What you've read in this NG for
the past couple months? And who are you? One of the regulars going by
a new nickname, like Erica being Amy? I have no idea who you are.
>
>
Gar
(Durango) was divinely inspired to scribe:
>On Wed, 01 May 2002 16:58:25 -0500, Gar <g_fra...@hotmAaBiCl.com>
>wrote:
>>
>>I want to be a prostitute.
>>
>Really? And your qualifications are?
Qualifications can't be discussed in this public forum. You wouldn't
believe me anyway.
>Is this why you've spent so much
>time over in Amsterdam?
Practice makes perfect.
>Is that why you've been so long missing from
>this NG?
Define missing?
>I'm the only regular in this NG who never seems to leave...
>Well. Since you've been exiiled in Amsterdam, apparently caught up in
>some sorta sleazy assignation with a Hungarian Stripper (must be true,
>I read it here...) nothing much has happened here.
No way! You must be joking. Nothing much happening? Here?
And a Hungarian Stripper in Amsterdam? My reputation precedes me.
Amsterdam is a great place to be exiled to. Land of the free. Home
of the under appreciated, overworked women. I never saw any men
working in the red light district. Which lead me to this great idea.
How come when we talk about legalizing prostitution everyone
immediately jumps on the "poor women" bandwagon. Men can be
prostitutes too. Poor desperate men putting their thing on the line
for a few lousy bucks.
>Sonny Pro Bono
>tried to eliminate that annoying Dana bastard from this NG by finally
>giving Dana the beating he has so long obviously deserved. But to the
>shock of everyone, somehow that lard ass Dana managed to get the best
>of the obviously much more fit Sonny PB. Must have something to do
>with Dana's military training.
I think I saw pictures of this. Which one was Dana?
>With the absence of Sonny Pro Bono
>there really is no one left with a sterling wit and a tart tongue.
He'll be back you know. I think the addiction was strong for him just
like it is for so many others. The bruising will fade, but the
addiction will linger. Dana will end up making the ass kicking a
yearly event. Pretty soon, it will draw huge crowds and you'll have
to pay for parking.
>That RDT person has tried to fill the void, but he is just no Sonny
>Pro Bono, even though he really does make a sincere effort. But then
>he has been distracted by a sizzling affair with Donisa. What a lucky
>guy.
Lucky is exactly what I was thinking as well! Isn't there a country
song out there, "If it weren't for bad luck, I'd have no luck at all"?
>Everyone is quite envious of his way with women. Snags one hottie
>after another. Don't know how he does it. Must have something to with
>his good looks, charming personality and impressive intellect. Anyway,
>I don't now if you are posting from Europe or are stateside, but it
>was nice to see your name appear again...do you have any pix of that
>stripper? I heard that you did....
What stripper? :-b
_______________________________________
Gar
"Just pretend it's Sunday and accept it."
Donisa
"Durango" <dur...@durangowashington.com> drunkenly babbled in message
>I sorta feel sorry for her. And I never said a
> disparaging word about her until I experienced her dark side. You
> really don't want me elaborating on that as it would erupt into
> Donisagate III. No ones wants that.
Your sorrow is wasted on me. Try using it on yourself, or better yet Dana.
My dark side? Well, I certainly don't deny that I have that part of me. I
wouldn't know what to call it other than when someone whom you are kind to
or suppose is your friend stabs you in the back then I would say I can be
mean I suppose. Actually, I think we're all capable of this side. Some,
like Jerry, just maintain it better than others. Some can keep it in check,
some cannot.
I've noticed that the sins this NG repeatedly accuses me of are the same
ones they committ themselves. Secrecy doesn't seem to be top issue here by
anyone. Well, not true. In my experience I've only met two people in this
NG who actually can keep secrets. Both men. Wiz, I know ya don't like me
but you're one of them. I totally trust ya on that. And RDT, you're the
other. I am amazed at what lies behind the computer because so many spill
their guts out right here. You, however, do keep your private life private.
Durango
>
>Your sorrow is wasted on me. Try using it on yourself, or better yet Dana.
>
said you repeatedly drive people away with your neediness and other
behaviors. I think that's sad cuz you have a nice side to you that can
serve you well. But there's something in your makeup that causes you
to cause problems and drive people away and that does make me feel
sorry for you cuz it wouldn't be that way for you if you did stay to
the good side of your nature. You got 3 nice kids who are a testament
to the fact that there is a good side to your nature.
> I
>wouldn't know what to call it other than when someone whom you are kind to
>or suppose is your friend stabs you in the back then I would say I can be
>mean I suppose.
>
stabbing?
> Actually, I think we're all capable of this side. Some,
>like Jerry, just maintain it better than others. Some can keep it in check,
>some cannot.
>
being would not be a bad role model for anyone.
>
>I've noticed that the sins this NG repeatedly accuses me of are the same
>ones they committ themselves. Secrecy doesn't seem to be top issue here by
>anyone.
>
edge cuz there are way too many people in here who have experienced
you telling them things, some true, some not.
>
> Well, not true. In my experience I've only met two people in this
>NG who actually can keep secrets.
>
dispense? Who tells you anything?
> Both men. Wiz, I know ya don't like me
>but you're one of them. I totally trust ya on that. And RDT, you're the
>other.
>
gtrgrrrl
You have no idea who I am and yet have not hesitated to insult me. Here and
in dfw.gen.
You may not remember who you've insulted...but I have not forgotten you.
Donisa has been nothing but cordial to me. You? Well, you look back on
your postings.
Donisa
"Gar" <g_fra...@hotmAaBiCl.com> wrote in message
>Sonny Pro Bono
> >tried to eliminate that annoying Dana bastard from this NG by finally
> >giving Dana the beating he has so long obviously deserved.
> I think I saw pictures of this. Which one was Dana?
I spewed my Pepsi One at this. First time I've ever done that. :)
> Lucky is exactly what I was thinking as well! Isn't there a country
> song out there, "If it weren't for bad luck, I'd have no luck at all"?
You know what they say. One man's trash is another man's treasure.
>
Durango
wrote:
>
>Qualifications can't be discussed in this public forum. You wouldn't
>believe me anyway.
>
>
>Define missing?
>
Absent. Disappeared. Kidnapped. Incarcerated.
>
>No way! You must be joking. Nothing much happening? Here?
>
and already I'm starting to get that feeling again of what am I doing
here in this room with some of these people?
>
>How come when we talk about legalizing prostitution everyone
>immediately jumps on the "poor women" bandwagon. Men can be
>prostitutes too. Poor desperate men putting their thing on the line
>for a few lousy bucks.
>
better charge more than just a few lousy bucks unless you are able to
put that thing of yours on the line dozens of times a day. You might
wanna think about charging more buck for your bang.
>
>I think I saw pictures of this. Which one was Dana?
>
smaller gut.
>
>He'll be back you know. I think the addiction was strong for him just
>like it is for so many others. The bruising will fade, but the
>addiction will linger. Dana will end up making the ass kicking a
>yearly event. Pretty soon, it will draw huge crowds and you'll have
>to pay for parking.
>
>Lucky is exactly what I was thinking as well! Isn't there a country
>song out there, "If it weren't for bad luck, I'd have no luck at all"?
>
>
>What stripper? :-b
>
That one in the corner.
Dana
>In article <ud29217...@corp.supernews.com>,
>Donisa <dul...@ticnet.com> wrote:
>>Is it correct to put the toilet paper on top or on bottom when putting it on
>>the little roll?
>
> It should face out (on top).
>
>>Everyone please vote. Except Durango who is excluded.
>
> He won't vote anyway. He and Dana have their He-Man Woman Hater's
>Club to run.
4 children later, I can hardly be painted as a woman hater, fool.
Happily married and my wife adores me. Must suck to be you Ralph.
--
-=Dana=-
"We may rise and fall, but in the end,
we'll meet our fate together!"
- Creed
w w w . d f w m e t r o . o r g / d a n a
[To reply via email, please remove my pants.]
Dana
>I don't really care how the paper roll is poised for action, just so
>long as it is. But what's with the colours? Why does toilet paper only
>come in pastels? where's navy blue? hot pink? crimson red? midnight
>black? forest green? Stripes? Is there some legal statute involved
>with this? maybe a congressional decree remaining from the days before
>indoor plumbing?
Certainly wouldn't want to taint our water supply with those dangerous inks and
dyes now would we?
Durango
>
>> Lucky is exactly what I was thinking as well! Isn't there a country
>> song out there, "If it weren't for bad luck, I'd have no luck at all"?
>
>You know what they say. One man's trash is another man's treasure.
>
humor. Not to mention some self-deprecating wit. And she's being
pretty reasonable and not being, well, mean. I think I may be right on
the verge of one of my patented reversals of opinion and be of the
opinion that Good Donisa is now totally dominant and Bad Donisa has
been relegated to the dark history of time.
Dana
>
>"Durango" <dur...@durangowashington.com> wrote in message
>
>> And poll of the NG females. Who do you think has a problem with woman? Me
>or
>> this RDT person? (Donisa is excluded from this poll)
>
>I think a poll is definitely in order. Yes, most definitely. I believe we
>should start with the basics in this poll. Ok, everyone get ready.....
>
>Is it correct to put the toilet paper on top or on bottom when putting it on
>the little roll?
>
>Everyone please vote. Except Durango who is excluded.
You need to adjust your time settings.