the problem with having a full length camp is the cost, co camp is
costing enough, quite a lot of people might not be able to afford both
co camp and DF camp. A camp for 4 or 5 days would be enough for most
people anyway.
Jack
On Mar 26, 8:40 pm, David Neibig <
david_nei...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> We should definitely try to have a full length camp but 2 days earlier.
> Failing that I'm not fully sure of which way to go. Having a full length camp is great but for the people who have to leave early that is a bit harsh. Trust me having to leave a camp early (or missing a few days in the middle) is a pretty shit feeling and I would be keen to avoid that.
>
> David
>
> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 17:31:07 +0000
> Subject: Re: [DF Discussions] Re: DF Camp 2011
> From:
liamkha...@googlemail.com
> To:
dfs-d...@googlegroups.com
>
> I feel like the options presented here are artificially restricted. As of yet, there is no reason why we cannot have a full DF Camp but 2 days earlier than originally planned (unless Alec, you have checked with the site and it's not available for us to start 2 days early?)
>
> If we cannot simply bring it forward by two days then I would be in favour of a shorter camp. It would make Workers Beer at Reading and Leeds easier to organise, but more importantly it should be slightly less challenging to organise, and therefore (I would hope) easier to have everything prepared before CoCamp. This would add to the fact that a slightly shorter DF Camp would be more appealing to any first-timers we may want to recruit at CoCamp.
>
> If I were allowed to attend DF Camp, it would be my last ever event, but I would appreciate the reasoning for making it shorter, and as such I would be all for running a shorter, cheaper, more inviting DF Camp, for one year only...
>
> Blue Skies
> Liam
>
> send email to
dfs-d...@googlegroups.com - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -