So wordpress was cast as an option, but I saw "drupal" a few times in
the intros thread, including my own. Any general aversion to using
drupal? No offense taken @aral if you want to keep this dead simple ~
the architecture is already a little distributed with discussions here
+ github repos, so a blog alone may just cut it.
But if we want to do anything cool with pimped out user profiles and
community interaction there either now or down the line, a drupal cms
instance could accomplish it quite handily (again, either now or later
- no reason not to switch over down the line if that needs to be the
case). It seems like we have some hands to do it now, though.
Thoughts?
On May 13, 12:31 pm, Aral Balkan <
a...@aralbalkan.com> wrote:
> I'm open to setting up space for this on my server + giving people the keys.
>
> Aral
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Robert Turrall <
rob...@turrall.net> wrote:
> > Hm, and I'd just about figured Wiki out... now I have to figure out github
> > ;)
>
> > I think the blog approach sound ok, for anecdotes and maybe "reporting
> > progress" on the actual bill of rights and other documents - this will need
> > multiuser blogging capabilities I guess. Does Wordpress do this? If not, try
> > b2evolution. Everybody who has a contribution can then be signed up with an
> > account to author articles/posts.
>
> > The end result of efforts should be a set of solid documents that can be
> > easily read, distributed and managed. github or whatever sounds ideal for
> > this.
>
> > Let's just not get into creating our own API....
>
> > Aral Balkan wrote:
>
> > Gotcha, Wiki bad.
>
> > I was looking into Wave but it still confuses the heck out of me and I
> > couldn't get it to embed correctly (maybe cos I was testing from
> > localhost:8888?)
>
> > I like the github idea :)
>
> > Aral
>
> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Ross Ritchey <
theboyofsp...@gmail.com>