You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Christian Tismer-Sperling, python-dev
This is very cool Chris -- thanks!
One question:
and with the amazing result of speed:
PyPy 3.8 works
10 times faster than the identical code on Python 3.10
and
5.5 times slower than the same example in C++ Qt.
Is this primarily Python-QT interaction? or computing the mandelbrot set, for which I would expect to see performance numbers like that.
Anyway, really cool in any case -- a major step for PyPy.
-CHB
--
Christopher Barker, PhD (Chris)
Python Language Consulting - Teaching - Scientific Software Development - Desktop GUI and Web Development - wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython
Christian Tismer-Sperling
unread,
Feb 4, 2022, 5:25:06 AM2/4/22
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Christopher Barker, python-dev
On 04.02.22 08:52, Christopher Barker wrote:
> This is very cool Chris -- thanks!
>
> One question:
>
> and with the amazing result of speed:
>
> PyPy 3.8 works
> 10 times faster than the identical code on Python 3.10
> and
> 5.5 times slower than the same example in C++ Qt.
>
>
> Is this primarily Python-QT interaction? or computing the mandelbrot
> set, for which I would expect to see performance numbers like that.
This is purely the calculation speed of Mandelbrot, run in a Gui,
with the working horse being Python vs. PyPy. Qt only acts as
painter after each generation or when zooming.
Since the numbers for a pure Qt application were interesting too,
this was also given. But the showcase was "look ma, how fast it
is, and it works in a nice Gui".
> Anyway, really cool in any case -- a major step for PyPy.
Yes, I think so, too. The existence of a Gui for PyPy
might create much interest for both projects.