| I'd like to have Damon but at some point the Tigers ought to start reducing their offer or take it off the table. Damon is making us look like fools. What does this say to our guys, most specifically the man most affected by it, Carlos Guillen? Tell Mr. Damon that the deals drops by $1 million a day. And in five days the offer goes away. Cal Rev. Dr. Cal Lord, Pastor First Baptist Church, Norwich, CT web: www.fbcnorwich.org blog: www.pastorcal.blogspot.com --- On Fri, 2/19/10, Withey, Jeff <jwi...@med.wayne.edu> wrote: |
| Rob, I say that, not that anyone really cares, because it has been reported that our offer is substantially higher, and for more years, than any other offer he has received since he rejected the Yankee offer. Plus, the talk among sports writers is that he is using our offer to try and sweeten the pot from other clubs. I'd say becing used makes us look a little foolish. Cal |
> I'd like to have Damon but at some point the Tigers
> ought to start reducing their offer or take it off the table.
> Damon is making us look like fools.
I have to agree with Rob in saying that the Tigers don't really look
like fools yet. They made a substantial offer, hoping that it would be
enough to intice immediate action, but obviously, immediate action
didn't happen. Still, almost everyone who is familiar with the
situation agrees that the reason why Mr. Damon has not signed with the
Tigers is not because the Tigers haven't made a generous-enough offer.
Scott Boras Badenov is hoping that some team will start a bidding war.
If anyone looks like a fool in this, it's not the Tigers but rather Mr.
Damon and his agent. They look like money-grubbers who don't know when
they have received the best offer that they are going to get. They are
the ones being unrealistic, not the Tigers.
Then again, this is the sort of behaviour which everyone in baseball
expects from Scott Boras and his clients.
> What does this say to our guys, most specifically the man
> most affected by it, Carlos Guillen?
Perhaps it tells them that the Tigers are still out there trying to
improve the team,e ven if it means that Mr. Ilitch has to spend his own
money to do so.
> Tell Mr. Damon that the deals drops by $1 million a day.
> And in five days the offer goes away.
First off, the Yankees tried putting a time limit on their offer, and it
didn't work. Mr. Damon and Mr. Boras will take their time, no matter
what you want. They may come back to the Tigers two weeks after such a
deadline and finally say that they would take the offer that had already
expired. And what should the Tigers do then? Unless they have signed
someone else for about the same money in the interim, they really
wouldn't have a reason for not making the offer available again. Well,
no reason other than stubbornness on the Tigers' part. Taking a stand
like that would make the Tigers look even worse than simply making a big
offer and waiting while someone who is known to play games waits to see
if there is a bigger counteroffer.
A wise man said that you should always see to it that you have enough
money to finish a building project before you start it, lest you have to
abandon it and people point at you and say, "That man started what he
could not finish." Right now, the White Sox are reported to have made
an offer and withdrawn it because they don't have enough money available
for next year. They look foolish in just the way that that very wise
man described. The Tigers would look foolish that way as well if they
were to withdraw their offer.
Worse yet, since it is supposedly the biggest offer so far, they might
be asked very publicly to renew the offer. They would then be in a very
tight spot. If they don't make that offer again, then they look like
they "started what [they] could not finish". And if they do agree to
make the offer available again, then Mr. Boras has made the Tigers look
foolish for taking it off the table in the first place when they didn't
really mean it. It's a lose-lose for the Tigers.
Even if it looks like they are being played for a patsy, it's better to
let that happen then to take the offer off the table. The potential
backlash from that move is really bad.
Now, if the Tigers had someone else to offer that money to instead, that
would make a difference. Then, they could say, "Take the offer by our
deadline, or we will sign player X instead." That's the sort of
ultimatum that the Yankees made, and they don't look too foolish for
having done it. But, who would that other player be, and how much would
they offer that other player? That is the rub. Right now, Mr. Damon
has the upper hand in that way, and he knows it.
RK
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Bielawski" <stevebi...@sbcglobal.net>
To: "Tigers List" <tig...@lists.ibl.org>
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: The Johnny Damon saga
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.435 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2698 - Release Date: 02/19/10
19:34:00