Old
news. in case you missed.....
A
Foreign writer opens our eyes...
Religious
and Charitable Endowment Act of 1951 allows
State Governments and politicians to take over
thousands of Hindu Temples and maintain complete
control over them and their properties. It is
claimed that they can sell the temple assets and
properties and use the money in any way they
choose.
A
charge has been made not by any Temple
authority, but by a foreign writer, Stephen
Knapp, in a book (Crimes Against India
and the Need to Protect Ancient Vedic
Tradition), published in the United States that
makes shocking reading.
Hundreds
of temples in centuries past have been built in
India by devout rulers and the donations given
to them by devotees have been used for the
benefit of the (other) people. If, presently,
money collected has ever been misused (and that
word needs to be defined), it is for the
devotees to protest and not for any government
to interfere. This letter is what has been
happening currently under an intrusive law.
It
would seem, for instance, that under a Temple
Empowerment Act, about 43,000 temples in Andhra
Pradesh have come under government control and
only 18 per cent of the revenues of these
temples have been returned for temple purposes,
the remaining 82 per cent being used for
purposes unstated.
Apparently
even the world famous Tirumala Tirupati Temple
has not been spared. According to Knapp, the
temple collects over Rs 3,100 crores every year
and the State Government has not denied the
charge that as much as 85 per cent of this is
transferred to the State Exchequer, much of
which goes to causes that are not connected with
the Hindu
community. |
Was it
for that reason that devotees make their offering to
the temples?
Another
charge that has been made is that the Andhra
Government has also allowed the demolition of at
least ten temples for the construction of a golf
courses. Imagine the outcry, writes Knapp, if ten
mosques had been demolished.
It
would seem that in Karanataka, Rs. 79 crores were
collected from about two lakh temples and from that,
temples received Rs seven crores for their
maintenance, Muslim madrassahs and Haj subsidy were
given Rs 59 crore and churches about Rs 13 crore.
Very generous of the government.
Because
of this, Knapp writes, 25 per cent of the two lakh
temples or about 50,000 temples in Karnataka will be
closed down for lack of resources, and he adds: The
only way the government can continue to do this is
because people have not stood up enough to stop
it.
Knapp
then refers to Kerala where, he says, funds from the
Guruvayur Temple are diverted to other government
projects denying improvement to 45 Hindu temples.
Land belonging to the Ayyappa Temple, apparently has
been grabbed and Church encroaches are occupying
huge areas of forest land, running into thousands of
acres, near Sabarimala.
A
charge is made that the Communist state government
of Kerala wants to pass an Ordinance to disband the
Travancore & Cochin Autonomous Devaswom Boards
(TCDBs) and take over their limited independent
authority of 1,800 Hindu temples. If what the author
says is true, even the Maharashtra Government wants
to take over some 450,000 temples in the state which
would supply a huge amount of revenue to correct the
states bankrupt conditions.
And,
to top it all, Knapp says that in Orissa, the state
government intends to sell over 70,000 acres of
endowment lands from the Jagannath Temple, the
proceeds of which would solve a huge financial
crunch brought about by its own mismanagement of
temple assets.
Says
Knapp: Why such occurrences are so often not
known is that the Indian media, especially the
English television and press, are often anti-Hindu
in their approach, and, thus, not inclined to give
much coverage, and certainly no sympathy, for
anything that may affect the Hindu community.
Therefore, such government action that play against
the Hindu community go on without much or any
attention attracted to them.
Knapp
obviously is on record. If the facts produced by him
are incorrect, it is up to the government to say so.
It is quite possible that some individuals might
have set up temples to deal with lucrative earnings.
But, that, surely, is none of the governments'
business? Instead of taking over all earnings, the
government surely can appoint local committees to
look into temple affairs so that the amount
discovered is fairly used for the public
good?
Says
Knapp: Nowhere in the free, democratic world are the
religious institutions managed, maligned and
controlled by the government, thus denying the
religious freedom of the people of the
country.
But it
is happening in
India.
Government
officials have taken control of Hindu temples
because they smell money in them, they recognise the
indifference of Hindus, they are aware of the
unlimited patience and tolerance of Hindus, they
also know that it is not in the blood of Hindus to
go to the streets to demonstrate, destroy property,
threaten, loot, harm and/or kill.
Many
Hindus are sitting and watching the demise of their
culture. They need to express their views loud
and clear. Knapp obviously does not know that should
they do so, they would be damned as communalists.
But, it is time some one asked the Government to lay
down all the facts on the table so that the public
would know what is happening behind its back.
Robbing Peter to pay Paul is not secularism. And
temples are not for looting, under any name..
http://www.stephen-knapp.com/
Also
read: The
Cure for corruption in India
by Stephen Knapp
One
thought ….. what makes us what we
are?