Brahmins should Stop
Defaming
Rabindranath
Tagore
Dirgha Raj Prasai Jee,
The bigoted
Brahmins should stop defaming the great poet and nationalist visionary Gurudev
Rabindranath Tagore. The dogmatic Brahmins do not like Rabindranath Tagore
because he was a great thinker who advocated reforms favoring widow
remarriage, the abolition of untouchability and hereditary discrimination
based on the rigid caste system, etc.
The bigoted
Brahmins want Jana Gana Mana to be replaced by Vande Mataram as the National
Anthem because Vande Mataram was written in Sanskrit by a Brahmin called Bankim
Chandra Chattopadhya. The bigoted Brahmins always favor the literary works of
fellow Brahmins, especially when they are written in the Sanskrit language.
Why don't you
stop writing against Jana Gana Mana and defaming Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dirgha Raj Prasai" <
dirghar...@gmail.com>
To:
"Ashok T. Jaisinghani" <
asho...@sancharnet.in>
Sent: 09
Oct 2011 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: Jana Gana Mana is a Prayer to
God
My Suggestion to Change the Indian National
Anthem
By Dirgha Raj Prasai (Nepal)
I am always in fever of Sovereign-India with
Hindu Nation as Nepal.
We have two pious Hindu countries in the
world-
Himabatkhanda and Bharatkhanda. Kailash-Mansarowar to
Hinda-Mahasagar
is the original place of Hindus and Hinduism. The Bramhaputra
in east,
Hindukush in west, north Kailash-Mansarowar and the south Ganga
River
is the boundary of Himabatkhanda(Nepal) and Ganga to
Hinda-Mahasagar
is Bharatkhanda (India). Kailash-Mansarowar is the pious land
of the
lord Shiva. We Nepalese and Indian people do not want any kind of
communist
authoritarianism, they aspire only full democracy. The concerns of
the
Nepalese and Indian people are political stability, peace and
good
governance. There are some confusion between Nepal and India.
It
should be solved cordially for the sake of the prestige of
both
countries.
In the context of Indian history moreover during the
regime of Muslims
in India, English imperialist-East India Company invaded
India with Christianity.
They came first as traders. Secondly they came carrying Bible and
of course
thirdly, the came with the sword building their own military
force
secretly. The objective was to take over India and everybody
knows
they succeeded. The British bribed the military by paying salaries
to
fight for them to control Muslims. Many Sikhs and other
Indians
joined the British military. This was betraying to own race -
Hindus.
This is actual history.
The present national anthem of India
represents the past depressed
time of India by British. The great laureate
and poet of India,
Rabindra Nath Tagore had composed a song "Jaana Gaana
Maana Adhinayaka
Jaya He Bharat Bhagya Bidhata….." to welcome the British
Emperor
George-V in 1911 AD. After the independence of India (1947), the
song
accepted as the national anthem. Yes, the song was highly
appreciated
as a welcome song at that time. But, why it was accepted
in
'Independent-India' as a national anthem? This indicates that
the
Indian mentality has been influenced by the British
imperialism.
It may be that former Indian PM Nehru was Indian by body,
but was an
Englishman at heart. The British Emperor George V traveled to
India
with the queen at 1911, the King and Queen traveled to Delhi
Durbar
where George wore the newly-created Imperial Crown of India at
the
ceremony and declared the shifting of the capital of India
from
Calcutta to Delhi. On 15 December of same year, he laid the
foundation
stone of New Delhi with Queen Mary. They traveled throughout Nepal
in
the invitation of Chandra Shamshre, then PM of Nepal, and George
took
an opportunity to indulge in hunting tigers, shooting at
Nepalese
Tarai- Southern part of Nepal. But, it would be good that as
an
independent nation to choose another national anthem for
India.
An Indian scholar Bhagavaandaas Tyaagi mentions- 'Many
historians aver
that the newspaper reports cited above were misguided. The
confusion
arose in British Indian press since a different song,
"Badshah
Humaara……." written in Hindi by Rambhuj Chaudhary, was sung on
the
same occasion in praise of the monarch. The nationalist Indian
press
stated this difference of events clearly- the proceedings of
the
Congress party session started with a prayer in Bengali to praise
God
(song of benediction). This was followed by a resolution
expressing
loyalty to King George V. Then another song was sung welcoming
King
George V." (Amrita Bazar Patrika, Dec.28, 1911)
Mr. Tyaagi
quoting the Bengalee, Dec. 28, 1911, further says 'The
annual session of
Congress began by singing a song composed by the
great Bengali poet Babu
Ravindranath Tagore. Then a resolution
expressing loyalty to King George V
was passed. A song paying a
heartfelt homage to King George V was then sung
by a group of boys and
girls.' Even the report of the annual session of the
Indian National
Congress of December 1911 stated this difference: "On the
first day of
28th annual session of the Congress, proceedings started after
singing
Vande Mataram……. On the second day the work began after singing
a
patriotic song by Babu Ravindranath Tagore. Messages from well
wishers
were then read and a resolution was passed expressing loyalty to
King
George V. Afterwards the song composed for welcoming King George V
and
Queen Mary was sung."
In the context of Indian national Anthem An
Indian scholar S.C. Gupta
writes-'As I have made a Thorough study of our
"Jana Gana Mana...."
and "Vande Mataram... "National Songs, hence, please
allow me to state
the following facts: Gandhiji, showing the weakness before
the
Muslims, agreed that "Vande Mataram…….." our Most Patriotic
National
Song may not be sung from any Congress platforms till its dispute
is
resolved with Muslims. As a result our Most Nationalist and
Patriotic
Song was not sung from any Congress Platforms in between
1930-1937.
In 1937, Gandhi , showing his weakness towards
the Muslims ,
resolved the dispute by agreeing to Muslims that this
whole song will
not be sung in its full form, but its First Four lines only
, which
formed the basis of division of Bharat Varsh, in spite
of the fact
that Vande Mataram …… was nothing more
than the most patriotic
song sung in the
praise of one's motherland sincerely. This
most
patriotic & nationalist song is not
a simple patriotic
song but it is
a mantra which provides immense energy
to
its singer that's why all
Satyagrahies and Krantikaries
before they
were hanged or tortured by the then
cruel &
brute British forces & their
Indian stooges always recited "
Vande
Mataram... while fighting with the British for our freedom.
A scholar
-Shri Dharam Paul writes-'The British looted India in
trillions. If
they have to return the loot, then the Swiss black
money becomes juju by the
fact remains that during Bengal famine,
British exported rice from India to
take care of their war efforts.
In the process, 3 million Hindus died of
starvation. An excellent
book is available on this topic. Again, during
the British rule, more
than 5 million Hindus were killed. It is because of
the British divide
and rule, India was portioned, giving way for Hindu-Muslim
riots.
Millions of precious lives were lost. Why British came to India -
to
plunder the wealth - because our country was prosperous.The
British
destroyed the indigenous industry.' Then, still, why
Indian
nationalists are obeying the British's path?
Of course, history
is misguided due to dirty politics played by
leaders and traitors in the
country. Britishers before leaving India
had given
away millions of hectares land, property and
money
to Indian politicians. Many of their children are
ruling over
India. Probably it would be the main cause of all the
ills and
corruption in India. The present government of India is
not willing to
change the national anthem. The government is guided by Mrs.
Sonia
Gandhi who probably does not want to do so. Therefore
Indian
nationalists should initiate the advocacy towards changing
their
national anthem. The India city Bombay had changed to Mumbai, so
on
Madras to Chennai, and Calcutta to Kolkata. Then, why not
national
anthem, a song devoted to British Emperor be
changed?
Email: dirghar...@gmail.com
On 10/9/11, Ashok T. Jaisinghani <asho...@sancharnet.in>
wrote:
Jana Gana Mana is a
Prayer to God
Some dogmatic
persons are still trying to find fault with Jana Gana Mana by wrongly stating
that Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore had written the song in honor of King
George V, the British Emperor, during his visit to India in the year 1911. It
just does not matter even if some boys and girls had sung Jana Gana Mana to
welcome the British Emperor to India.
To understand
whether it was written in praise of the King or not, we should carefully read
all the words in the song shown below:
Jana gana mana Adhinaayaka
jaya hey,
Bhaarata bhaagya Vidhaata.
Panjaaba, Sindha, Gujaraata, Maraathhaa,
Draavida, Utkala, Banga,
Vindya, Himaachala, Yamunaa, Gangaa,
Uchchhala jaladhi taranga.
Tava shubha naame jaage,
Tava shubha
aashisha maange,
Gaahey tava jaya gaathaa.
Jana gana Mangaladaayaka jaya hey,
Bhaarata bhaagya Vidhaata.
Jaya hey, jaya hey, jaya hey,
Jaya, jaya, jaya, jaya hey.
The controversy
whether or not Jana Gana Mana was a song written in honor of King George V, the
British Emperor, can be settled by the meaning of the following two lines of
Rabindranath Tagore's poem:
Tava shubha naame jaage,
Tava shubha aashisha
maange.
The meaning of
the two lines shown above is as follows:
Waking up with your Holy Name,
We ask for your auspicious blessings.
In all the
religious communities of India, the devotees take the name of God upon
awakening in the early morning and seek His blessings. So it is absolutely clear
that Jana Gana Mana is a song in praise of God. Jana Gana Mana is definitely a
prayer.
The devotees do
not seek the blessings of any king or emperor on waking up in the morning.
The meaning of the two lines proves without any doubt that Jana Gana Mana could
never have been written by Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore for praising King
George V, the British Emperor.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dirgha Raj Prasai" <
dirghar...@gmail.com>
To:
<
desi...@googlegroups.com>
Sent:
06 Oct 2011 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: (Desiyatra)-- Sindhis can Prevent Deletion
of Sindh from Jana
Gana Mana
Dear Indian Nationalists !
I am from Nepal. Since 2009, I have been expressing my opinion
on
Indian national anthem to change. So, please read, convey to all and
use.
My Suggestion to Change the Indian National Anthem
By
Dirgha Raj Prasai (Nepal)
The present national anthem of India represents
the past depressed
time of India by British. The great laureate and poet of
India,
Rabindra Nath Tagore had composed a song
"Jaana Gaana Maana Adhinayaka Jaya He
Bharat Bhagya Bidhata….." to welcome the British
Emperor
George-V in 1911 AD. After the independence of India (1947), the
song
accepted as the national anthem. Yes, the song was highly
appreciated
as a welcome song at that time. But, why it was accepted
in
'Independent-India' as a national anthem? This indicates that
the
Indian mentality has been influenced by the British imperialism.
It
may be that former Indian PM Nehru was Indian by body, but was an
Englishman
at heart. The British Emperor George V traveled to India
with the queen at
1911, the King and Queen traveled to Delhi Durbar
where George wore the
newly-created Imperial Crown of India at the
ceremony and declared the
shifting of the capital of India from
Calcutta to Delhi. On 15 December of
same year, he laid the foundation
stone of New Delhi with Queen Mary. . . .
Sindhis can Prevent
Deletion of Sindh
From Jana Gana
Mana
Some
persons are again trying to get "Sindh" deleted from Jana Gana Mana, the
National Anthem of India written by the great poet Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore.
The Sindhi leaders can easily prevent the deletion of "Sindh" from Jana Gana
Mana if they take one step, which I have explained below.
The
main objection to the mention of Sindh in the National Anthem is the fact that
Sindh is a part of Pakistan. At present, no part of Sindh is in India,
though there are millions of Sindhis living in the country.
This objection can be removed if all the Sindhi leaders,
living in India and other countries, jointly petition the Government of
Gujarat to create a small district with the name of Sindh from the District of
Kutch. I am sure that the large-hearted Kutchis will accept this proposal, just
as they had welcomed the Sindhi refugees from Pakistan to settle in
Kutch after the Partition of India in 1947.
Should the Sindhi leaders not send a petition to the Government of Gujarat
requesting it to make the region of Adipur-Gandhidham in Kutch into a
separate District of Sindh? The Sindhi leaders from all over the world must send
such a petition as soon as possible. The majority of the people in the
Adipur-Gandhidham region of Kutch are Sindhis, whose parents and grandparents
had migrated to India from Sindh after the Partition of the country.
Once we are able to get a very small District of Sindh anywhere in
India, there will be no need for the Government of India to delete the name of
Sindh from Jana Gana Mana. Even if it is very small, the new District of Sindh
will be known as a part of India. Jana Gana Mana will then require no
correction, as far as the mention of Sindh in the National Anthem is concerned.