有关AOP的问题
1 view
Skip to first unread message
xunin...@gmail.com
Mar 3, 2005, 10:07:34 PM3/3/05
to DesignPa...@googlegroups.com
AOP作为OOP的扩展，当然有着很大的作用，有关的应用和疑问希望大家在这里share一下
xunin...@gmail.com
Mar 3, 2005, 10:08:15 PM3/3/05
to DesignPa...@googlegroups.com
陆海涛
Mar 4, 2005, 12:15:34 AM3/4/05
to DesignPa...@googlegroups.com
Aspect本身能不能抽象和继承呢？
Samuel
Mar 4, 2005, 12:41:17 AM3/4/05
to DesignPa...@googlegroups.com
Nice question.
I think, In fact, aspect is the abstract object of solving a set of
similar things.
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:15:34 +0800, 陆海涛 <lan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Aspect本身能不能抽象和继承呢？
>
--
Best Regards
Samuel Chen
http://www.alphatom.com
I think, In fact, aspect is the abstract object of solving a set of
similar things.
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:15:34 +0800, 陆海涛 <lan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Aspect本身能不能抽象和继承呢？
>
--
Best Regards
Samuel Chen
http://www.alphatom.com
idior
Mar 4, 2005, 4:39:34 AM3/4/05
to DesignPa...@googlegroups.com
如果说OOP是竖的,那么AOP就是横的,那么如何看待AOP的体系结构呢?
抽象和继承是竖型结构的典型特征,那么横向又是怎样呢?
抽象和继承是竖型结构的典型特征,那么横向又是怎样呢?
吕震宇
Mar 10, 2005, 7:25:48 PM3/10/05
to DesignPa...@googlegroups.com
感觉AOP有点"依此类推"的味道。AOP似乎不允许插入的代码与原有代码有任何"交互"。
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:39:34 -0000, idior <xunin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 如果说OOP是竖的,那么AOP就是横的,那么如何看待AOP的体系结构呢?
> 抽象和继承是竖型结构的典型特征,那么横向又是怎样呢?
>
idior
Mar 11, 2005, 6:51:38 AM3/11/05
to DesignPa...@googlegroups.com
好像不是吧,记得看过介绍说想实现交互,但是方法好像挺复杂的.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages