8. Guard+Mimic
2 views
Skip to first unread message
soygreen
Sep 9, 2010, 10:42:57 AM9/9/10
to Descent FAQ Group
Guard+Mimic
Corbon Loughnan
Sep 13, 2010, 4:05:54 AM9/13/10
to Descent FAQ Group
Personally I don't think this is a question worth asking, but that is
not entirely my judgement to make, so it is offered here for
discussion at least, and can be abandoned if seen fit.
Background:
Guard clearly states it may be used during the OLs turn and not during
a hero's turn.
However the FAQ pg7 answer states that the Guard can be used to
"interrupt the OL at *any* time".
At least one player therefore believe that this answer overrides the
original rules and a Guard order may therefore be used during a heroes
turn to attack a mimic for example.
We all know he is wrong, but he does have a technical point.|
Ideally therefore, this answer should be edited to say "...interrupt
the OL at any time *during his turn*. ..."
That and/or we specifically ask whether a guard order may be used on a
mimic during it's initial activation, which I think is a specific
question trying to address a generality.
On Sep 9, 10:42 pm, soygreen <esch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guard+Mimic
not entirely my judgement to make, so it is offered here for
discussion at least, and can be abandoned if seen fit.
Background:
Guard clearly states it may be used during the OLs turn and not during
a hero's turn.
However the FAQ pg7 answer states that the Guard can be used to
"interrupt the OL at *any* time".
At least one player therefore believe that this answer overrides the
original rules and a Guard order may therefore be used during a heroes
turn to attack a mimic for example.
We all know he is wrong, but he does have a technical point.|
Ideally therefore, this answer should be edited to say "...interrupt
the OL at any time *during his turn*. ..."
That and/or we specifically ask whether a guard order may be used on a
mimic during it's initial activation, which I think is a specific
question trying to address a generality.
On Sep 9, 10:42 pm, soygreen <esch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guard+Mimic
jorge medina
Sep 14, 2010, 8:11:23 PM9/14/10
to desce...@googlegroups.com
I like the premise of amending the FAQ. It's best to keep the FAQ consistent with the rules if there's no reason to set up a discrepancy.
Corbon Loughnan
Sep 21, 2010, 10:58:48 PM9/21/10
to desce...@googlegroups.com
Agreed. I think perhaps the best way to do this one is give the background and instead of a Q&A make a proposal to edit the existing FAQ question as suggested below.
Corbon Loughnan
Sep 27, 2010, 4:16:11 AM9/27/10
to Descent FAQ Group
Now GLOAQed (the original Guard+Mimic question).
Not sure if it is still worth asking to amen the FAQ or not - probably
worthwhile I guess.
On Sep 22, 10:58 am, Corbon Loughnan <corbon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed. I think perhaps the best way to do this one is give the background
> and instead of a Q&A make a proposal to edit the existing FAQ question as
> suggested below.
>
Not sure if it is still worth asking to amen the FAQ or not - probably
worthwhile I guess.
On Sep 22, 10:58 am, Corbon Loughnan <corbon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed. I think perhaps the best way to do this one is give the background
> and instead of a Q&A make a proposal to edit the existing FAQ question as
> suggested below.
>
> On 15 September 2010 08:11, jorge medina <neo.j...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I like the premise of amending the FAQ. It's best to keep the FAQ
> > consistent with the rules if there's no reason to set up a discrepancy.
>
>
> > I like the premise of amending the FAQ. It's best to keep the FAQ
> > consistent with the rules if there's no reason to set up a discrepancy.
>
jorge medina
Sep 27, 2010, 6:04:42 PM9/27/10
to desce...@googlegroups.com
Possibly with a better-worded answer? Kevin's answer freely tosses about pronouns...
Corbon Loughnan
Oct 27, 2010, 2:58:31 AM10/27/10
to Descent FAQ Group
POSTED
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages