Bs 5950 Part 3
Faustina Bartsch
(a) There is hereby established the Early Diagnosis and Preventive Treatment (EDAPT) Program Fund within the State Treasury. Moneys from private or other sources may be deposited into the fund and used for purposes of this part. General Fund moneys shall not be deposited into the fund.
(b) When the Department of Finance has determined that the total amount of the moneys in the fund established pursuant to subdivision (a) has reached or exceeded one million two hundred thousand dollars ($1,200,000), the Controller shall distribute all of the moneys in the fund to the Regents of the University of California for the purpose of providing reimbursement to an EDAPT program for services provided to persons who are referred to that program, but whose private health benefit plan does not cover the full range of required services.
This is a long shot but I need some assistance with an older Walthers kit. (1994 or so according to the instructions.) How tall were the stock handrails on the 5950 DIFCO series? I purchased a kit for a project that got delayed. I started building it today and noticed the handrails were missing. I managed to bend some new ones using some .020" phosphor bronze wire I had on hand. I got the width using the holes on the frame but the height is elusive. As usual, any assistance that can be provided would be most welcomed.
Well, both the photo and the drawing provided by BN7150 do show handrails on the B-end of the car, which would be useful for gaining access to the handbrake wheel. You can, as mentioned, click on the photo to enlarge it and the drawing, and I was able to magnify it further using a feature of my computer.
I'd guess that there would be handrails only on the car's B-end, although the photo of the model with the dump-body elevated does show them on the A-end, too.
I'd use the prototype drawing from BN7150, draw a line across from handrail to handrail, and see where it intersects the brake wheel houseing, and use that to scale the dimension of the height of the handrail.
The opposite side of the sheet depicts an assembled car. As noted in posts above, the top of the handrail appears to bisect the brake wheel just slightly below the horizontal midpoint of the brakewheel.
Interestingly, the kit I just opened to locate the instructions did not include the handrails. If they were plastic, they were not located on the part sprue, and the sprue was complete w/o any removed or missing parts.
Funny that I saw one of these (UP) on EBay last week, so I ordered it and built it Mon/Tues. Mine is the 5950 series. The inner box was shrink wrapped but I don't know if that was by the factory or a later seller. No parts 17 handrails were included, though I don't know if a prior owner lost them. I just bent some 0.022 wire to an eyeball height off the photo.
It is a generally a nice kit and I intended to build it tilt-able. However, I found that (1) the clip-in sides (slightly warped) did not clip into the hinge slots and stay very well and (2) the body, with sides up and level, did not seem to sit nice and level in the four support slots reliably. I did not intend to display it tilted, so I just cut off the piston rods, glued the sides up, glued the assembly firmly into the frame slots and then gluded in a rock load. I like the result.
CARDONE Remanufactured Power Brake Boosters are re-engineered, built and tested to match O.E. performance. Original designs are scrutinized for potential improvement and, where applicable, design upgrades are implemented to produce a more durable part than the original. All units are 100% tested to ensure perfect fit and function.
In Transition This means that our inventory of this part number is presently not RoHS Compliant, however, the manufacturer will be shipping RoHS: Compliant to TTI in the future. This occurs when the manufacturer has decided not to change their part number to indicate RoHS Compliance. Contact TTI to determine the date that the RoHS: Compliant version of this product will be available.
The ezReel purchasing option allows you to configure your own custom quantity reels. This value added service lets you choose a custom quantity of parts per reel as well as the number of custom quantity reels desired. All ezReel orders are placed onto a standard 7" mini reel with leader and trailer attached. An additional $7.00 per reel charge will be assessed for this service.
Disclaimer: Qualified Manufacturer Declared 49-State Federal Emissions Compliant Part (Not legal for sale or use in California) means any aftermarket part intended to replace an original equipment emissions-related part and that meets all EPA emission regulations by installing the element of design in all emissions-related respects to the certified configuration of the vehicle, engine, or piece of equipment. This manufacturer has declared in writing that it has fully documented the emissions testing of an appropriate test vehicle, engine, or piece of equipment that had been identically altered and that the part meets all applicable emissions standards for that make/model/year fitment(s) advertised.
For gaming the 5800X3D would be the obvious choice. My research has shown that games profit a lot from the additional cache of the 5800X3D. Also this CPU would be some 100 EUR cheaper. Nontheless the computer lacks in performance with photo editing. The 5950X might be the CPU with the best productivity benchmark scores, but there were specific benchmarks for photoshop that shows only a small difference between the 5800X3D and the 5950X. So I'm asking myself, if photo editing tools can also benefit of the additional L3-Cache.
Since this will be an upgrade that should last the next years I'm looking for high performance for the am4 socket. Is there any information, if the 5800X3D might be a good choice or if the raw performance of the 5950X would have the bigger impact in boosting the performance?
I take photos for focusstacking (30 to 100 pictures to be stacked to 1 picture in the process). These pictures are edited before the stacking. That's my bottleneck! It would take some 30 to 60 minutes to process the raw images. I work with Luminar Neo which uses the GPU but most of the time the CPU for the calculation.
I would say the 5950X is the better choice for something that can do everything well. If you were more gaming-focused, the 5800x3d is a good choice, but given you're doing other picture editing and processing. 5950x would be your best bet in my opinion
You made a good point with "But if gaming is somehow limited,...". There are only a few cases when I was gaming and thought the performance of the computer could be better. Instead rendering the images can be quite annoying. I'm not a professional - I'm just an ambitious beginner. Nonetheless I have limited time for this hobby and waiting for the rendering will shorten the time I have to take pictures and edit them. So I'd go with the 5950X and will have quite a while till the next upgrade.
I had the 5900x then the 5800x3d now i have the 5950x. In my opinion, the 5950x is the best all-around-use chip for gaming, productivity, work station etc. My Win11 OS felt kinda slow when I have the 5800x3d, the 5900x i was experiencing weird boost throttle so i went back to exchange it for another 5900x and ended up walking out with the 5950x for an extra $75 and I can game, stream, work and multitask without breaking a sweat and averaging 275FPS in Warzone which is CPU heavy but again its all personal preference.
The 5800x3D was struggling with OBS for some reason even though I use NVENC encoding I couldnt figure out what the issue was unless maybe the L3 Cache was fully allocated to Warzone or something but thats above my knowledge
Funny thing. I generally just build another computer in place of swapping out the CPU. I don't like messing with a computer that is running well. But there have been a few builds that I upgraded the CPU after doing a BIOS update. The Windows 10 to Windows 11 upgrade forced one of those.
Both BS 5950 Part 8[1] and Eurocodes are available for the design of structural steel in fire in the UK. The Eurocodes suite consists of: BS EN 1991-1-2[2], BS EN 1993-1-2[3] and BS EN 1994-1-2[4]. These codes concern themselves mainly with the design of individual elements of construction in fire. The behaviour of frames and assemblies in fire is usually dealt with using advanced fire engineering methods.
Although both codes are quite different in scope and complexity, they are based on a common understanding of the strength of structural steel in fire and also the factors which affect inherent fire resistance. BS 5950 Part 8[1] was withdrawn in 2017, but may still be used according to the UK building Regulations.
All materials become weaker when they get hot. The strength of steel at high temperature has been defined in great detail and it is known that at a temperature of 550C, hot rolled structural steel will retain 60% of its room temperature load capacity. This is important because, before the introduction of limit state design concepts, permissible stress was used as a basis for design. In this approach, the maximum stress allowed in a member was about 60% of its room temperature strength. This led to the commonly held assumption that 550C was the highest (limiting) temperature that a steel structure would withstand before collapse. Research has shown, however, that the limiting temperature of a structural steel member is not fixed at 550C but varies according to two factors, the temperature profile and the load.
A joint test programme by Tata Steel (then British Steel) and the Building Research Establishment showed that the temperature profile (i.e. the variation in temperature) through the cross-section of a steel structural member has a marked effect on its performance in fire. The basic high temperature strength curve shown above has been generated by testing a series of small samples of steel in the laboratory, where the whole of each test sample is at a uniform temperature and is axially loaded.When these conditions are repeated in a full scale member tests, for example, a loaded fire test on a full scale column heated uniformly and supporting a load that produces a force or moment equal to 60% of its room temperature resistance, it will also fail at 550C. But if the section is not uniformly heated then, when the hotter part of the section reaches the temperature at which it will begin to yield plastically, it will transfer load to cooler regions of the section, which will still act elastically. As the temperature rises further, more load is transferred from the hot region by plastic yielding until eventually the load in the cool regions becomes so high that they too become plastic and the member fails.
64591212e2