Hello Again All,
It got late and I didn't finish my thoughts
yesterday.
Scaling Back DeoWeb
I didn't want to leave the impression that some
pastors and/or parish staff are the only ones who may have control issues. I
notice that in most cases there are one or two people that are doing all the
imputing for content in many of the parish. Some have indicated so in this
exchange. That was not the idea of DeoWeb as I first understood it. Sure there
were suppose to be Site Administrator, but there were also to be Content
Managers and Editors that could imput and publish directly. There were
also suppose to be authors that would have to submit stuff to someone
(presumably the Site Admins) before it got published but the author was
to imput the material. I am not sure this is happening much. It sounds
like most of us are getting stuff from others and doing the work of adding
content to our sites. Please, no criticism intended. I know we are all doing
what we can. I know several have talked about how there was enthusiasm at the
beginning from people who took the training but then it fizzled, but I am
wondering if they all got an opportunity to get their feet wet?
Let me explain using my own example. When
DeoWeb first arrived I was at Holy Trinity parish. I was deacon there. Amoung
the other things that I was responsible for I became the Site Admin (our parish
priest had just got his first computer). There were five of us who took the
training. I wanted to get the site up and running so I used every available
moment to put stuff on. We were in the middle of renovations and revitalization
and stuff so there were not too many moments. The other folks were busy with
their lives, some were not all that computer savvy, and then there is what I
like to call "Father Says", or in my case, "The deacon says". That is
people seems to seek approval for everything they want to do before
they do it. Not that it is a rule, it just seems to be the way many of us
Catholics operate! So, much of the time it was easier to do it myself than to
explain again how to put stuff up. But neither did I insist they try,
nor did I 'grant' them access. Control issues.
I am no longer at Holy Trinity and to this day the
only thing that is on the site is stuff I put on. My sin for not insisting,
theirs for not demanding.
WHAT DO WE DO?
Maybe we could contact those folks that first got
involved with us and offer them some space on the site for whatever they are
involved with the parish? I will commit to contacting those people at Holy
Trinity to encourage them to take over their site.
What is the Value of DeoWeb? Why is it
Important?
It's value is as varied as the imput we have seen
to Gerry's question. For some it is an extention of the parish bulletin, for
others a place to publish events from the parish and local community. I know for
me it is a way to 'shrink' the diocese. With the newsletter I get access to
stuff happening around the diocese. I can check on individual parish websites
just to keep up, or I can check out mass schedules if I am going to be in the
city. It just seems to make us closer. I really don't check my parish website
(Our Lady of Hope - Sudbury) that often because I general find out about stuff
going on there on Sunday or in the printed bulletin.
Another way I find it valuable is with my current
responsibilty as Social Justice Coordinator for the diocese. It is a little hard
to find that page (it is under English Pastorial Services - on the right hand
side of the main diocesan page, under the title 'Social Affairs' if you are
interested) but I believe when people are surfing the web that page may turn up
when the are looking for justice items. I know I have receive compliments from
people in other dioceses for that page ( it may be for my good looks as I have a
picture posted there) and for the SSM site in general.
Like many I persevere in the hope that somebody,
somewhere, is looking at the stuff and learning something or deciding to take
some action, or at least becoming better informed.
I know Gerry suggested something like facebook.com
and we do have 'Comment' tabs on several of the pages and there is a 'Chat'
section available. I have run websites before and so (Gerry knows) I am a little
nervous about this sort of thing. Very often it is the malcontents, complainers
and critics that are the first to use these tools. Not always, but very often.
Then we are left with trying to defend our church, our pope, our pastor(s),
something we posted, etc. Often there is really no point in trying to do so
because the person is so entrenched they are not willing to listen, only argue.
I know this has already gone on on the diocesan site from talking to persons, at
the diocesan offices, responsible for screening the site. This takes up a
lot of time.
Sorry to go on so long. Let me raise one final
point. The great evil WEB THIEF and JUNK MAIL!
Yes, many of parishioners are older folks but even
many of the younger ones are reluctant to join or subscribe to a site, or to
identify or describe themselves, in case the WEB THIEF finds out too much about
them and "steals their identity" or they are plagued with a new source of JUNK
MAIL. We have already had the issue of one person who was asked to join
this group, didn't, somehow got signed up anyway and
considers that as new source of JUNK.
I am sure Gerry will agree in the beginning this
was a real problem (at least the junk mail/spam. I don't think anyone had their
identity comprimised). I know there has been a beefing up of security on the
site but two things remain. The legacy of our early experience, which people at
least heard about, and the fact that there is always a better mouse-trap, or
security system, but it always cost more money. Right Gerry.
I don't know how you counteract this 'Internet
Phobia' once it set in but again maybe some brain storming gatherings will come
up with some ideas.
Would you believe that is all for now?
Best regards to all,
Paul Labelle