On 24/05/2012 22:11, Ian Jackson wrote:
> In message <HZwvr.37402$Gm4....@newsfe01.iad>, Martin Brown
> <|||newspam|||@
nezumi.demon.co.uk> writes
>> I haven't seen any examples yet, but I am told that there is a Fedex
>> variant floating about today as well. Demon's filters are also letting
>> a fair proportion of Big8 stuff through today as well.
>> (.
hinet.net .hk .tw .cn)
>>
>> Have they forgotten to pay this months subscription or something?
>>
> Every day, I get several DHLs, plus loads more from extremely devout,
> God-fearing people with very white Anglo-Saxon names, offering to give
> me millions of pounds or US dollars if only I will allow them to let
> their money rest for a while in my bank account.
I get them too, but not in sufficient quantity to be annoying.
At the moment the only thing getting through in annoying quantities to
me is Big5 spam in Chinese base64 encoding (30 last night). They all
have one thing in common which appears to prevent Demons antispam from
working (msg content is short and in most cases identical). There are
two "From: " headers one of them always claims to be 3 random letters
and the other many more random letters. Sample header attached.
From - Sun May 27 05:06:47 2012
X-Account-Key: account4
X-UIDL: 1SYUbE-2qFknw-07-EVv
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path: <
thic...@thickcash.com>
Received: from
punt3.mail.demon.net by mailstore
for
m......@nezumi.demon.co.uk id 1SYUbE-2qFknw-07-EVv;
Sun, 27 May 2012 03:57:00 +0000
Received: from [194.217.242.106] (lhlo=
anchor-hub.mail.demon.net)
by
punt3.mail.demon.net with lmtp id 1SYUbE-2qFknw-07
for
m......@nezumi.demon.co.uk; Sun, 27 May 2012 03:57:00 +0000
Received: from [216.177.153.5] (helo=
ozzie.simplecom.net)
by
anchor-hub.mail.demon.net with esmtp id 1SYUbD-0001fV-Rl
for
m......@nezumi.demon.co.uk; Sun, 27 May 2012 03:57:00 +0000
Received: from f-225224966f204 (
122-118-182-28.dynamic.hinet.net
[122.118.182.28])
(authenticated bits=0)
by
ozzie.simplecom.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q4R1PbQB012305;
Sat, 26 May 2012 20:26:41 -0500
Message-Id: <
201205270126....@ozzie.simplecom.net>
From: "fpxatbivscqy" <
tw-edm...@yahoo-inc.com>
From: "kgb" <
nor...@email.yahoo-inc.com>
To:
peace....@msa.hinet.net
Subject: =?BIG5?B?qGukSLPMt1Gtbqq6saGkSLhgIMKnqqsgpf7AXaRVsf6ku6fpISE=?=
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 09:26:46 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="Big5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Priority: 1
X-MSMail-Priority: Highest
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=h4BhjouQ5y0A:10 a=Hypp6HKwPKgA:10
a=jPJDawAOAc8A:10 a=yzEQj7oRC6AA:10 a=CYtdG_-2rjoA:10 a=K2vTPFBP1oAA:10
a=CjxXgO3LAAAA:8 a=Id8GVSMAAAAA:8 a=EoKvt9gEt5c-bsjGNmwA:9 a=4VmKGKSqCdEA:10
Whilst they are easily filtered against it seems to me that they
*should* be easy prey for a signature matching antispam filter.
(I am killing on received for m...... header at present)
--
Regards,
Martin Brown