On 05/04/2013 19:17, John Hall wrote:
> In article <
lbjtl8tcft0qc3jtv...@4ax.com>,
> Stephen Wolstenholme <
st...@npsl1.com> writes:
>> On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 17:28:17 +0100, Fred Bambrough <fred@[127.0.0.1]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In message <
1l0subm.1qskj862jcpjfN%pe...@cara.demon.co.uk>
>>>
pe...@cara.demon.co.uk (Peter Ceresole) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mike Thomas <.@invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, received mine today complete with Vodafone branding.
>>>>
>>>> AOL.
>>>>
>>>> Isn't it pretty in red?
>>>
>>> Must be all that red that made it weigh 1.61MB for 17 bytes of info (You owe
>>> xx.xx GBP).
>>
>> It is a grossly inefficient message format. One line of text would be
>> enough.
> <snip>
>
> Most companies nowadays seem to think that the branding is more
> important than the actual message content. :(
unoptimised images. I guess bandwidth has become too cheap.