> >I am getting _very_ worried about Karol
> >
> >God bless him, our pontifex seems to be ailing!
> >
> >We, at dl, should consider a contingent candidate!
> >
> >Who amongst the dl denizens would get your vote?
> >
> >
> Pope {R} - he'd tellem!
I suggest another Pope Leo - after all, there is a precedent. Pope {R}
would have to be known as the Sunshine Pope and this would confuse
people terribly
--
leo
God bless him, our pontifex seems to be ailing!
We, at dl, should consider a contingent candidate!
Who amongst the dl denizens would get your vote?
--
bob beetham
Warrington and Gateshead and Via Appia
> Who amongst the dl denizens would get your vote?
Friday should be the Pope, becouse I say so :)
>
--
-=- Marcus Durham -=-
Circular logic will only make you dizzy
Eldrad must live
Perhaps he's a little too familiar with hell-fire.
--
CS-J
> In article: <824200...@lgab.demon.co.uk> leo <l...@lgab.demon.co.uk>
> writes:
>
> > Pope {R} would have to be known as the Sunshine Pope and this would
> > confuse people terribly
>
> Can you picture the scene, too, as Pope {R} says 'Bless you, fuckwit'...
Or when the Queen visits the Vatican and gets "You're in the
wrong establishment, sunshine - get off to the bloody CofE where
you belong".
--
Mike (DF) Fleming MAG #79794 DoD #4446 Greenpeace #567708F
JKLO #004 KotWP7 UKMC #9
In this world of rapacious greed, protection is spread very thin
Dolphins and birds are looked upon as distant deserving kin
> Is there any evidence that the Borgias didn't believe in God? Yes,
they
> were extremely wicked, but that isn't conclusive. At that time I
would
> think that about 99.9% of the population were believers.
John....please...please....plllleeeaaasssseee...do not
convert this thread into a Borgias subject...
you see Bobb ( for obscure reasons, nesting in time ) has a little
and I mean, just a little, knowledge on the subject
I do not wish to convert a quip into 'lectwool disscuss'sion
--
bob beetham
Warrington and Gateshead ( so who cares ? )
> In article <824240...@zenn.demon.co.uk>
> mar...@zenn.demon.co.uk "marcus durham" writes:
>
> > In article <592860...@beetham.demon.co.uk>
> > b...@beetham.demon.co.uk "bob beetham" writes:
> >
>
> Shouldn't the Pope believe in God. Or *a* god, at least? I don't
> believe that there is a God, god or any higher power. Doesn't that
> rather count me out of the running?
Not really :)
Ok then I nominate Alan Freeman as God ( refer to that Young Ones sketch ) and
Friday as the Pope. I assume Friday belives in Alan Freemen. Of course
I could be the Pope. I mean I cannot think of anyone better for the
job :)
> Ok then I nominate Alan Freeman as God ( refer to that Young Ones sketch ) and
> Friday as the Pope. I assume Friday belives in Alan Freemen.
Not 'alf!
Predictable? Moi?
--
My other bumper sticker is funny.
Suze! How nice to see you. Where have you been?
--
The object of war is not to die for your country but to make
the other bastard die for his.
General George Patton (1885-1945)
>I am getting _very_ worried about Karol
>
>God bless him, our pontifex seems to be ailing!
Must be the wages of sin.
>We, at dl, should consider a contingent candidate!
>
>Who amongst the dl denizens would get your vote?
I vote for anyone who promises to stop being so daft, and allows
Catholics to catch up with the human race.
Suze
Susan J. Berris "F*** art, boogie!"
s...@will-ell.demon.co.uk
http://www.wonderland.org/~suze/
> I vote for anyone who promises to stop being so daft, and allows
> Catholics to catch up with the human race.
>
> Suze
'Lo again, stranger, How are you?
(And in answer to JH's query too!)
>'Lo again, stranger, How are you?
/me bows or something
I'm well, thanks. Back to full health (well, as full as it gets!), and
recently undergone an employment transition sort of thingy.
Nice to see things haven't changed - I had to mark a good half the
threads as not to be downloaded because they consisted entirely of
slagging off; some fun to be had; some interesting serious discussions.
As to "where have I been" the answer appears to be "doing loads of
work". I'm trying to get over it! I'm reading the group again now, but I
suspect it will take a while to get back to full posting speed!
But nice to see you all again!
>I vote for anyone who promises to stop being so daft, and allows
>Catholics to catch up with the human race.
Suze!
Welcome back. How are you now?
--
David Hadley
>Suze!
David!
>Welcome back. How are you now?
As posted elsewhere, much better thanks!
Shall we get some decent arguments going about obscure musicians, then?
:-)
--
Pete
>>Shall we get some decent arguments going about obscure musicians, then?
>
>Okay. You go first, I can't think of anything to say today I'm so
>tired.
OK, the latest thingy on my mind...
I noticed yesterday that the album from The Bluetones went straight to
number one in the Our Price album chart, displacing the Oasis one. The
question I ask myself (and the good people of demon.local!) is how much
longer will this go on?
I'm finding it difficult to be objective about so-called "Britpop",
because for the first time in ages I find myself actually liking a lot
of the music that is part of the latest pop craze. But I can't help
thinking that the market is becoming saturated with bands populated by
young men with guitars writing jangly songs.
And what next? I shudder to think...
--
Winston Churchill
"I like pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us.
Pigs treat us as equals."
>} question I ask myself (and the good people of demon.local!) is how much
>} longer will this go on?
>
> Until Quoasis split / die of a cocaine overdose I guess.
*smile*
> ( Fortunately, there are no signs of that at the moment! )
You are a fan then? I like Oasis, I think there is something genuinely
exciting about their music. I know they get accused of plagiarism, but
at least they are honest about it. I thought their version of Cum On
Feel The Noize was stonking.
> " Britpop " took off in the music press around April 1993 and
> happened mainly due to the death of Kurt Cobain (rip) and with it
> the hopes of "grunge". At near enough the same time, Blur finally
> broke through into the mainstream and partly filled a gaping void
> in the british music press.
>
> However, the jangly guitar bands have always been around but never
> with enough cohesiveness to dominate the music scene for any length
> of time and, in the main, just seen as 60's or 70's revivalists in
> the eyes of many music journalists.
Yes, I guess that will always be the accusation. I seem to remember a
lot of that sort of thing around at the time I was at Uni (early
eighties), and it was quite refreshing after the rock overdose.
> IMO the Bluetones deservedly recieved the recognition for their debut
> LP by replacing Oasis at the top of the album charts. I for one hope
> this is where the future of music lies... and long may it continue,
> but preferably without labeling everything "Brit Pop" !
I didn't mean the term in any pejorative sense, you understand! I'm not
keen on labels myself - having been a member of a "progressive rock"
band, I know how restrictive they can be.
I bought the Bluetones album, and I think its great. It has also sounded
the death knell for my CD player, which is getting on anyway - it
wouldn't play on it at all, but it was fine on the CD-ROM drive on the
PC. Which is where I do most of my listening anyway!
> Hey Friday.... are you knocking out cheap bootlegs now ???
Definitely. Want one?[1] ;)
> ...or do people actually take notice of the occaisional
> URL in your sig :)
Maybe. People, what's the story?
[1] Depends on whether I can manage to get a ticket for the extra Saturday
gig at Maine Rd. [fx:crossed fingers]
--
He's dead, Jim.
} Not really. The only reason why Oasis are in the charts is because old
} fogeys like you and Suze keep buying their CDs. :)
}
} Dom, who finds them quite dull and repetitive.
So who(m) d'you find bright and unrepetitive?
--
JOhn ____/\
\ o o | www.ftech.net/~nebula
=( @ )=
Version 0.95
} I think I just cast off about 10 years of solid bigotry on Friday when
} I purchased the current Oasis CD - ain't it just stonkin' well f'in
} fabulous?
definitely maybe
Hey Friday.... are you knocking out cheap bootlegs now ???
...or do people actually take notice of the occaisional
URL in your sig :)
--
neal
" There's a rockabilly party on saturday night,
are you gonna be there ? " Ian Hunter.
>I think I just cast off about 10 years of solid bigotry on Friday when
>I purchased the current Oasis CD - ain't it just stonkin' well f'in
>fabulous?
Yes, I felt like I did when I first got into rock music. Genuinely
exciting. As with a lot of rock music you have to ignore the
personalities, ignore the hype, and just get on with the boogie.
And another hot tip - The Bluetones CD, mentioned elsewhere in this
thread is growing and growing. They could be huge.
>And another hot tip - The Bluetones CD, mentioned elsewhere in this
>thread is growing and growing. They could be huge.
Friday is my CD purchase day - we get let out any time after 3:15 if
we've done a good week's work. I go straight over to the shop for a
natter and a listen, then do the shopping with Betty when she finishes
work. Then I can try out the new purchase on the way home - boogie on!
--
N.
How did you make that ! turn out red in my Turnpike software (and your
other text come out black, as expected)??
* Sylvia *
inquiring minds need to know
>
--
Sylvia Spruck Wrigley
Turnpike evaluation. For information, email: in...@turnpike.com
} Urm. Why do you have to ask such probing questions, John?
Curiosity.
} I listen to lots of different kinds of music, but I don't buy a lot. The
} last CDs I bought were The Great Escape and The Girl with The X-Ray
} Herring. Or something.
!
} Anyway, it's not so much the music I find dull and repetitive, it's the
} band. I object to giving what little money I have to people who.
} 1. Trash hotels because they "can afford to".
OK - but some hotels seriously need trashing... and anyway it's
all part of the popular music tradition?
} 2. Support Manchester City (in more ways than one, apparently).
Yup! ...though supporting any Manchester football club is objectionable?
:-)
--
JOhn ____/\
\ o o |
=( @ )=
V
>} Not really. The only reason why Oasis are in the charts is because old
>} fogeys like you and Suze keep buying their CDs. :)
>}
>} Dom, who finds them quite dull and repetitive.
>
> So who(m) d'you find bright and unrepetitive?
Urm. Why do you have to ask such probing questions, John?
I listen to lots of different kinds of music, but I don't buy a lot. The
last CDs I bought were The Great Escape and The Girl with The X-Ray
Herring. Or something.
Anyway, it's not so much the music I find dull and repetitive, it's the
band. I object to giving what little money I have to people who.
1. Trash hotels because they "can afford to".
2. Support Manchester City (in more ways than one, apparently).
>In article <313369a6...@news.demon.co.uk>
> ne...@skipper.demon.co.uk "Neil" writes:
>
>> I think I just cast off about 10 years of solid bigotry on Friday when
>> I purchased the current Oasis CD
>
>Why, is it pro-Labour?
Silly boy - you must be heading in my direction age-wise Mike. Haven't
you noticed that over the years you tend to disregard more and more
new music, giving all sorts of reasons why it's crap. It's a matter of
putting myself back in the open minded position I was in, a long time
ago, when everything new sounded great. Or maybe Oasis sound so good
because you can imagine the Beatles churning it out :)
--
N.
"Swine flew, past my window, in the moonlight"
} [1] Depends on whether I can manage to get a ticket for the extra Saturday
} gig at Maine Rd. [fx:crossed fingers]
}
.. There's people on the pitch.....
.... It's going to rain.......
see DAT. that's you Dat is. :)
PS. what's the best bootleg tape you've got .... cos I could always
swap yer a copy of Ziggy Live (circa early 70's).
--
neal
"look out to sea, and tell me what we came here for" JP.
>Not really. The only reason why Oasis are in the charts is because old
>fogeys like you and Suze keep buying their CDs. :)
Oi you! Old I may be in your eyes (at coming up to 44), but fogey -
NEVER!
>Dom, who finds them quite dull and repetitive.
So what do you enjoy then ?
>Not really. The only reason why Oasis are in the charts is because old
>fogeys like you and Suze keep buying their CDs. :)
>
>Dom, who finds them quite dull and repetitive.
But as you once admitted, Dom darling, you have no taste!
} In article <825533...@cobalt.demon.co.uk>
} fri...@cobalt.demon.co.uk "Friday" writes:
}
} } [1] Depends on whether I can manage to get a ticket for the extra Saturday
} } gig at Maine Rd. [fx:crossed fingers]
} }
} .. There's people on the pitch.....
} .... It's going to rain.......
}
} see DAT. that's you Dat is. :)
}
} PS. what's the best bootleg tape you've got .... cos I could always
} swap yer a copy of Ziggy Live (circa early 70's).
How about including a .gif of Neal minus a lot of hair ?
{R}
Strange isn't it? When I listen to them I hear a Lennon in there.
Or at least how he would have sounded.
I hasten to add I only *borrowed* the CD.
--
JK. ######################## JK.
>>But as you once admitted, Dom darling, you have no taste!
>
>But Susan dearest, why do you think I like you so much? :P
*grin*
} In article <825618...@jwd42.demon.co.uk>, John Davies
} <Jo...@jwd42.demon.co.uk> writes
} > !
} How did you make that ! turn out red in my Turnpike software (and your
} other text come out black, as expected)??
}
} * Sylvia *
} inquiring minds need to know
} >
...it's first sign of the dreaded "Crimson Text Death Virus (tm)" propagated
by self-aware copies of KA9Q to seek out and destroy evil Turnpike software.
Also infects web pages (www.ftech.net/~nebula).
--
JOhn ____/\
\ o o | ..who is reading this in red CTDV text on a blue background.
=( @ )=
V KA9Q Rules OK?
} Strange isn't it? When I listen to them I hear a Lennon in there.
" No thank you, brother."
" you can keep you fookin' Brit. "
--
neal
" can I ride with you in your BMW,
you can sail with me in my yellow submarine " NG.
>You tend to lose the innocent openmindedness that lets you believe that
>a new record is important on the say-so of a well-funded publicity
>campaign.
Cynic! :)
>Hanging upside down from the ceiling with Michelle Pfeiffer smearing my
>body in molten chocolate.
>
>Why do you ask?
Just because enquiring minds need to know these things. You don't mind
if I make a note of your reply in my little black book, do you ?
> Mike Fleming <Mi...@tauzero.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >In article <313369a6...@news.demon.co.uk>
> > ne...@skipper.demon.co.uk "Neil" writes:
> >
> >> I think I just cast off about 10 years of solid bigotry on Friday when
> >> I purchased the current Oasis CD
> >
> >Why, is it pro-Labour?
>
> Silly boy - you must be heading in my direction age-wise Mike.
Six years behind, and no prospect of overtaking...
> Haven't
> you noticed that over the years you tend to disregard more and more
> new music, giving all sorts of reasons why it's crap.
I've tried to stay open-minded. I still tend to measure things
against a sort of 'best of seventies' yardstick, so music which
still has that vaguely 'traditional' feel to it gets bought - I
think the last CD I got was 'Great Expectations' by Tasmin
Archer. Tell a lie, it was a Bach clavicord and organ
collection. I don't find Oasis unpleasant, but I do find them
rather dull and uninspiring.
It may be a bit ironic, given my original comment, but the band
I was in until about 6 months ago was really good, and I could
actually listen to our music. The singer/guitarist, though, was
rather more left-wing than me, and although I could cope with
that, his material became more and more black-and-white. He
produced a 'newsletter' for the band (just the one), which
contained such simplistic crap I was ashamed to be associated
with it... the end came because the drummer and I were fed up
with Steve's guitar being so bloody loud (Steve and I had
originally set up as an acoustic duo, then he'd gone back
electric as we gained a drummer and a viola player), and I was
pissed off with the lyrics he was coming up with.
> It's a matter of
> putting myself back in the open minded position I was in, a long time
> ago, when everything new sounded great. Or maybe Oasis sound so good
> because you can imagine the Beatles churning it out :)
That would put me off - the best thing ever from the Beatles was
"A little help from my friends", and that was crap until Joe
Cocker covered it. Oops, how seventies of me.
--
Mike (DF) Fleming MAG #79794 DoD #4446 Greenpeace #567708F
JKLO #004 KotWP7 UKMC #9
In this world of rapacious greed, protection is spread very thin
Dolphins and birds are looked upon as distant deserving kin
I'm sorry, you'll have to speak up; I can barely hear you!
--
Wijnand
http://www.armature.net.au/users/werwulf/
New URL - same boring page.
Okay, it doesn't work too well as a whole LP, but it does have some good
tracks; I stick it in my CD player and programme tracks 4, 6, 7 & 9.
I think many people took it too seriously. Do you remember when it was
first released, the number of critics who claimed that it was trying to
emulate 'Sgt. Pepper'? The better critics, though, spotted that the
Stones were taking the piss out of 'Sgt. Pepper'; mostly good-natured,
though Bill Wyman's 'In Another Land' is a bit sneering.
You want bad Rolling Stones? That accolade must shirley go to 'Between
The Buttons'.
> At a suitable time of the night I'd substitute the recent copy with the flat
> surface, for the original with the "hologrammatic" one :)
I sold mine in the mid 70s, dire straits and all that; I though it a
great pity that it was not reproduced for the CD transfer. Still, it
was nice to have the 'bog' cover of Beggars Banquet back for the CD.
> > What was that LP, 60s or 70s, that had 'Play Loud' on the cover?
> Well The Pretenders first album did, but I'm sure there were others...
Sure were; the one that slips my memory was long before The Pretenders.
"Where's that joint?" - Mick Jagger.