Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Fucking Windows!

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Feb 28, 2012, 7:29:34 AM2/28/12
to
Couldn't find a forum to moan about this, so I'll do it here.

I had several programs open and now can't remember what they were, as Windows restarted without my permission.

I was typing an email and up popped a thing asking to restart (after installing software). As I was typing, I was obviously using the spacebar to type sentences. Windows took the spacebar to mean "yes" I wish to restart. Fuck's sake. If I'm in the middle of a conversation with Jim, I don't expect Joe to come up to me and ask a question and take a "yes" in a sentence spoken to Jim to mean Joe can do something!!!!

How many versions of Windows before common sense is added?

The only forum I did find with annoyances was read only, and had THIS shite:

"Most people who use Windows 7 quickly come to accept the way it combines shortcuts (links to non-running applications and windows) with buttons (links to running apps and windows)."

What a load of fucking tosh. Why on earth would ANYONE want to confuse RUNNING apps with NON-RUNNING apps? These are complete opposites!!!!!! It used to be only the Mac that did this illogical thing - then M$ went and copied it? Surely they should only copy the GOOD things?!?! Yes it can be stopped by tweaking it, but why should I have to?

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

When you want a man to play with you, wear a full-length black nightgown with buttons all over it.
Sure it's uncomfortable, but it makes you look just like his remote control.

Hello, Purbeck

unread,
Feb 29, 2012, 2:27:27 PM2/29/12
to
I would imagine fucking a window could be quite painful.

HP

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 1, 2012, 5:37:25 AM3/1/12
to
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:27:27 -0000, Hello, Purbeck <he...@purbe.ck> wrote:

> I would imagine fucking a window could be quite painful.

Not if you use a glass file to make the hole smooth first.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Viagra Lite
For people who only want to masturbate

Viagrallium
A mix of Viagra and Vallium: if you don't get to fuck, then you don't give a fuck.

ah

unread,
Mar 3, 2012, 10:46:55 PM3/3/12
to
On 3/1/2012 5:37 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:27:27 -0000, Hello, Purbeck <he...@purbe.ck> wrote:
>
>> I would imagine fucking a window could be quite painful.
>
> Not if you use a glass file to make the hole smooth first.

Kids these days.
--
a "http://ded.increpare.com/~locus/puppy_shelter/" h

ah

unread,
Mar 3, 2012, 10:47:58 PM3/3/12
to
On 2/29/2012 2:27 PM, Hello, Purbeck wrote:
> I would imagine fucking a window could be quite painful.

Only the closed ones.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 4, 2012, 9:43:02 AM3/4/12
to
On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:47:58 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2/29/2012 2:27 PM, Hello, Purbeck wrote:
>> I would imagine fucking a window could be quite painful.
>
> Only the closed ones.

Fucking an open window would either be completely pointless, or require the use of a very large piece of equipment.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

A weekend wasted is not a wasted weekend.

Hello, Purbeck

unread,
Mar 4, 2012, 10:52:03 AM3/4/12
to
On 04/03/2012 14:43, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:47:58 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/29/2012 2:27 PM, Hello, Purbeck wrote:
>>> I would imagine fucking a window could be quite painful.
>>
>> Only the closed ones.
>
> Fucking an open window would either be completely pointless, or require the
> use of a very large piece of equipment.

Do you have a very large piece of equipment, Lieutenant Scott?

HP

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 4, 2012, 11:31:33 AM3/4/12
to
That depends on what you are comparing it to.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Why do they rate a movie "R" for "adult language?"
The only people I hear using that language are teenagers.

ah

unread,
Mar 4, 2012, 8:56:03 PM3/4/12
to
On 3/4/2012 9:43 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:47:58 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2/29/2012 2:27 PM, Hello, Purbeck wrote:
>>> I would imagine fucking a window could be quite painful.
>>
>> Only the closed ones.
>
> Fucking an open window would either be completely pointless, or require the use of a very large piece of equipment.

This might not be the venue to air your inadequacies.

ah

unread,
Mar 4, 2012, 8:56:50 PM3/4/12
to
On 3/4/2012 11:31 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:52:03 -0000, Hello, Purbeck <he...@purbe.ck> wrote:
>
>> On 04/03/2012 14:43, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:47:58 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/29/2012 2:27 PM, Hello, Purbeck wrote:
>>>>> I would imagine fucking a window could be quite painful.
>>>>
>>>> Only the closed ones.
>>>
>>> Fucking an open window would either be completely pointless, or require the
>>> use of a very large piece of equipment.
>>
>> Do you have a very large piece of equipment, Lieutenant Scott?
>
> That depends on what you are comparing it to.

How about, well . . . a window opening, for example?

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 5, 2012, 5:54:53 AM3/5/12
to
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:56:03 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/4/2012 9:43 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:47:58 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/29/2012 2:27 PM, Hello, Purbeck wrote:
>>>> I would imagine fucking a window could be quite painful.
>>>
>>> Only the closed ones.
>>
>> Fucking an open window would either be completely pointless, or require the use of a very large piece of equipment.
>
> This might not be the venue to air your inadequacies.

The title of one of the groups contains a word for genitalia, so I'd say it was.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

You have reached the CPX-2000 Voice Blackmail System. Your voice patterns are now being digitally encoded and stored for later use. Once this is done, our computers will be able to use the sound of YOUR voice for literally thousands of illegal and immoral purposes. There is no charge for this initial consultation. However our staff of professional extortionists will contact you in the near future to further explain the benefits of our service, and to arrange for your schedule of payment. Remember to speak clearly at the sound of the tone. Thank you.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 5, 2012, 5:55:04 AM3/5/12
to
Sash?

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

ah

unread,
Mar 6, 2012, 7:40:33 PM3/6/12
to
On 3/5/2012 5:55 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:56:50 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/4/2012 11:31 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:52:03 -0000, Hello, Purbeck <he...@purbe.ck> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04/03/2012 14:43, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:47:58 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/29/2012 2:27 PM, Hello, Purbeck wrote:
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only the closed ones.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fucking an open window would either be completely pointless, or require the
>>>>> use of a very large piece of equipment.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have a very large piece of equipment, Lieutenant Scott?
>>>
>>> That depends on what you are comparing it to.
>>
>> How about, well . . . a window opening, for example?
>
> Sash?

Levalour, if you please.

ah

unread,
Mar 6, 2012, 7:43:12 PM3/6/12
to
On 3/5/2012 5:54 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:56:03 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/4/2012 9:43 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:47:58 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/29/2012 2:27 PM, Hello, Purbeck wrote:
>>>>> I would imagine fucking a window could be quite painful.
>>>>
>>>> Only the closed ones.
>>>
>>> Fucking an open window would either be completely pointless, or require the use of a very large piece of equipment.
>>
>> This might not be the venue to air your inadequacies.
>
> The title of one of the groups contains a word for genitalia, so I'd say it was.

Actually, 'scrotum' is appropriate; so, your precis is denied.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 6, 2012, 7:56:03 PM3/6/12
to
Kinky. http://www.levolor.com/images/splash/splash-photo.jpg

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Quando omni Flunkus Moritati - When all else fails, play dead.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 6, 2012, 7:56:42 PM3/6/12
to
[confused expression]

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Yorkshire man takes his cat to the vet.
Yorkshireman: "Ayup, lad, I need to talk to thee about me cat."
Vet: "Is it a tom?"
Yorkshireman: "Nay, I've browt it wi' us."

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 6, 2012, 8:01:35 PM3/6/12
to
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:43:12 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> a "http://ded.increpare.com/~locus/puppy_shelter/" h

I cannot play this. Opera says I need flash installed although it already is. Internet Explorer writes the instructions in a huge font which falls off the bottom so I can't read it.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

A woman walks into a drugstore and asks the pharmacist if he sells size extra large condoms.
He replies, "Yes we do. Would you like to buy some?"
She responds, "No, but do you mind if I wait around here until someone does?

ah

unread,
Mar 7, 2012, 9:23:20 PM3/7/12
to
On 3/6/2012 7:56 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:40:33 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/5/2012 5:55 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:56:50 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/4/2012 11:31 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 15:52:03 -0000, Hello, Purbeck <he...@purbe.ck> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/03/2012 14:43, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have a very large piece of equipment, Lieutenant Scott?
>>>>>
>>>>> That depends on what you are comparing it to.
>>>>
>>>> How about, well . . . a window opening, for example?
>>>
>>> Sash?
>>
>> Levalour, if you please.
>
> Kinky. http://www.levolor.com/images/splash/splash-photo.jpg

Leuver-lore?

ah

unread,
Mar 7, 2012, 9:25:45 PM3/7/12
to
On 3/6/2012 8:01 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:43:12 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> a "http://ded.increpare.com/~locus/puppy_shelter/" h
>
> I cannot play this. Opera says I need flash installed although it already is. Internet Explorer writes the instructions in a huge font which falls off the bottom so I can't read it.

Kinda like how your newsreader trails-off to the right off the page far past
others' ability to appreciate just what you're trying to elucidate?

ah

unread,
Mar 7, 2012, 9:26:35 PM3/7/12
to
On 3/6/2012 7:56 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:43:12 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/5/2012 5:54 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:56:03 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/4/2012 9:43 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012 03:47:58 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/29/2012 2:27 PM, Hello, Purbeck wrote:
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Only the closed ones.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fucking an open window would either be completely pointless, or require the use of a very large piece of equipment.
>>>>
>>>> This might not be the venue to air your inadequacies.
>>>
>>> The title of one of the groups contains a word for genitalia, so I'd say it was.
>>
>> Actually, 'scrotum' is appropriate; so, your precis is denied.
>
> [confused expression]

You do know what a scrotum is, don't you?

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 8, 2012, 2:19:03 PM3/8/12
to
Louvre-lore?

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Contrary to popular belief, the most dangerous animal is not the lion or the tiger. The most dangerous animal is a shark riding on an elephant, trampling and eating everything it sees.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 8, 2012, 2:19:49 PM3/8/12
to
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 02:25:45 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/6/2012 8:01 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:43:12 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> a "http://ded.increpare.com/~locus/puppy_shelter/" h
>>
>> I cannot play this. Opera says I need flash installed although it already is. Internet Explorer writes the instructions in a huge font which falls off the bottom so I can't read it.
>
> Kinda like how your newsreader trails-off to the right off the page far past
> others' ability to appreciate just what you're trying to elucidate?

That's why I said Internet Explorer too. If a page doesn't work with IE, it's fucked.

Oh and turn on your word wrap. In Agent you press O. Dunno about others.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

It's strange, isn't it? You stand in the middle of a library and go "Aaaaaaagghhhh!!!!" and everyone just stares at you. But you do the same thing on an aeroplane, and everyone joins in.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 8, 2012, 2:21:04 PM3/8/12
to
Yes. Bollocks. Like the group title. Hence discussing genitalia is correct in this venue.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Intercourse prevents divorce.

ah

unread,
Mar 8, 2012, 8:51:12 PM3/8/12
to
On 3/8/2012 2:19 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 02:23:20 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/6/2012 7:56 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:40:33 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/5/2012 5:55 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:56:50 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/4/2012 11:31 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about, well . . . a window opening, for example?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sash?
>>>>
>>>> Levalour, if you please.
>>>
>>> Kinky. http://www.levolor.com/images/splash/splash-photo.jpg
>>
>> Leuver-lore?
>
> Louvre-lore?

Window-covering-porn.
--
a "http://vimeo.com/couchmode/luyang/videos/sort:date/31923751" h

ah

unread,
Mar 8, 2012, 8:51:54 PM3/8/12
to
The discussion of genitalia is not correct any any venue.

ah

unread,
Mar 8, 2012, 8:53:30 PM3/8/12
to
On 3/8/2012 2:19 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 02:25:45 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/6/2012 8:01 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:43:12 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> a "http://ded.increpare.com/~locus/puppy_shelter/" h
>>>
>>> I cannot play this. Opera says I need flash installed although it already is. Internet Explorer writes the instructions in a huge font which falls off the bottom so I can't read it.
>>
>> Kinda like how your newsreader trails-off to the right off the page far past
>> others' ability to appreciate just what you're trying to elucidate?
>
> That's why I said Internet Explorer too. If a page doesn't work with IE, it's fucked.
>
> Oh and turn on your word wrap. In Agent you press O. Dunno about others.

Some of us don't have the luxury of such screen real estate.

I--for example--am reading this on my Nintendo 64.

So, put that in your pipe, and smoke it.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 9, 2012, 12:17:21 PM3/9/12
to
Of course it is. We are all born with them.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

The children were lined up in the cafeteria of a Catholic elementary school for lunch. At the head of the table was a large pile of apples. The nun made a note, and posted on the apple tray: "Take only ONE. god is watching."
Moving further along the lunch line, at the other end of the table was a large pile of chocolate chip cookies. A child had written a note, "Take all you want. god is watching the apples."

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 9, 2012, 12:18:26 PM3/9/12
to
If you are clever enough to get a Nintendo 64 to work on the internet, you are clever enough to build yourself an enormous screen.

Anyway I'm sure even a Nintendo can wrap when it hits the edge - I got my ZX Spectrum to do it.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Do you know how to get an 88 year old woman to say "BITCH!"?
You get a 72 year old woman to yell "BINGO!"

ah

unread,
Mar 9, 2012, 8:28:19 PM3/9/12
to
On 3/9/2012 12:17 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:51:54 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/8/2012 2:21 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 02:26:35 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/6/2012 7:56 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:43:12 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/5/2012 5:54 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, 'scrotum' is appropriate; so, your precis is denied.
>>>>>
>>>>> [confused expression]
>>>>
>>>> You do know what a scrotum is, don't you?
>>>
>>> Yes. Bollocks. Like the group title. Hence discussing genitalia is correct in this venue.
>>
>> The discussion of genitalia is not correct any any venue.
>
> Of course it is. We are all born with them.

No on both the former, and the latter (as % can attest).

ah

unread,
Mar 9, 2012, 8:29:33 PM3/9/12
to
On 3/9/2012 12:18 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:53:30 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/8/2012 2:19 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 02:25:45 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/6/2012 8:01 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 00:43:12 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> a "http://ded.increpare.com/~locus/puppy_shelter/" h
>>>>>
>>>>> I cannot play this. Opera says I need flash installed although it already is. Internet Explorer writes the instructions in a huge font which falls off the bottom so I can't read it.
>>>>
>>>> Kinda like how your newsreader trails-off to the right off the page far past
>>>> others' ability to appreciate just what you're trying to elucidate?
>>>
>>> That's why I said Internet Explorer too. If a page doesn't work with IE, it's fucked.
>>>
>>> Oh and turn on your word wrap. In Agent you press O. Dunno about others.
>>
>> Some of us don't have the luxury of such screen real estate.
>>
>> I--for example--am reading this on my Nintendo 64.
>>
>> So, put that in your pipe, and smoke it.
>
> If you are clever enough to get a Nintendo 64 to work on the internet, you are clever enough to build yourself an enormous screen.
>
> Anyway I'm sure even a Nintendo can wrap when it hits the edge - I got my ZX Spectrum to do it.

Stop
that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 9, 2012, 8:41:33 PM3/9/12
to
Then I rephrase and request that you reanswer. Half of us have em, so whassafuckinproblem?

Oops, spelling error: http://petersphotos.com/temp/fucking%20spelling.jpg

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Mistress: Something between a mister and a mattress.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 9, 2012, 8:43:24 PM3/9/12
to
There is no problem up my end: http://petersphotos.com/temp/wrapped.jpg

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

The only substitute for good manners is fast reflexes.

ah

unread,
Mar 9, 2012, 8:47:59 PM3/9/12
to
On 3/9/2012 8:41 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:28:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/9/2012 12:17 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:51:54 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/8/2012 2:21 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 02:26:35 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/6/2012 7:56 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You do know what a scrotum is, don't you?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. Bollocks. Like the group title. Hence discussing genitalia is correct in this venue.
>>>>
>>>> The discussion of genitalia is not correct any any venue.
>>>
>>> Of course it is. We are all born with them.
>>
>> No on both the former, and the latter (as % can attest).
>
> Then I rephrase and request that you reanswer. Half of us have em, so whassafuckinproblem?

The problem is that your newsreader cuts >5 legacy attributions, thus negates
contextual appreciation and understanding.

>
> Oops, spelling error: http://petersphotos.com/temp/fucking%20spelling.jpg

Gee, and we've been telling you about the inadequacies of your newsreader for
what?, over five years now?

ah

unread,
Mar 9, 2012, 9:57:25 PM3/9/12
to
Well, aren't We just the special one.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 10, 2012, 5:50:01 AM3/10/12
to
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:47:59 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/9/2012 8:41 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:28:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/9/2012 12:17 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 01:51:54 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/8/2012 2:21 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:

>>
>>>>

>>

>>>>
>>

>>>>>
>>>>> The discussion of genitalia is not correct any any venue.
>>>>
>>>> Of course it is. We are all born with them.
>>>
>>> No on both the former, and the latter (as % can attest).
>>
>> Then I rephrase and request that you reanswer. Half of us have em, so whassafuckinproblem?
>
> The problem is that your newsreader cuts >5 legacy attributions, thus negates
> contextual appreciation and understanding.

WTF is that in English, and what has it to do with bollocks?

>> Oops, spelling error: http://petersphotos.com/temp/fucking%20spelling.jpg
>
> Gee, and we've been telling you about the inadequacies of your newsreader for
> what?, over five years now?

Does yours have the word whassafuckinproblem in its dictionary?

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Do not adjust your mind - the fault is with reality.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 10, 2012, 5:50:18 AM3/10/12
to
No, the one who chose the decent news program.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

There's been global warming since the ice age.

ah

unread,
Mar 11, 2012, 6:38:14 AM3/11/12
to
Oh, do twirl again!

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 11, 2012, 7:08:53 AM3/11/12
to
Stop chatting me up like that.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

HELP WANTED:
Baiters. Local fishing boats need 4 baiters to bate hooks for tourists. Must have strong hands and work hard. Good pay-$15 per hour, and benefits.
After 6 weeks, 2 best baiters will be promoted to masterbaiters. Apply in person to Jon at the Gulf Marina.

ah

unread,
Mar 11, 2012, 4:30:20 PM3/11/12
to
There is a colloquial add-on, but I just haven't been bothered to dl it.

Anyway(s), I've not ever participated in an argument over the neologistic
qualities of newsreaders, so I'm somewhat at a loss for words.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 11, 2012, 4:39:31 PM3/11/12
to
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:30:20 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/10/2012 5:50 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:47:59 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/9/2012 8:41 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:28:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/9/2012 12:17 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:

>>
>>>>

>>
>>>>
>>

>>>>
>>

>>>>>
>>>>> No on both the former, and the latter (as % can attest).
>>>>
>>>> Then I rephrase and request that you reanswer. Half of us have em, so whassafuckinproblem?
>>>
>>> The problem is that your newsreader cuts >5 legacy attributions, thus negates
>>> contextual appreciation and understanding.
>>
>> WTF is that in English, and what has it to do with bollocks?
>>
>>>> Oops, spelling error: http://petersphotos.com/temp/fucking%20spelling.jpg
>>>
>>> Gee, and we've been telling you about the inadequacies of your newsreader for
>>> what?, over five years now?
>>
>> Does yours have the word whassafuckinproblem in its dictionary?
>
> There is a colloquial add-on, but I just haven't been bothered to dl it.

I just "add word" when I see something it doesn't have. Whassafuckinproblem is now a word.

> Anyway(s), I've not ever participated in an argument over the neologistic
> qualities of newsreaders, so I'm somewhat at a loss for words.

Neologistic is not a word, Opera says so.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

"Sir, your daughter says she loves me, she can't live without me, and wants to marry me."
"And you're asking my permission to marry her?"
"No, I'm asking you to make her leave me the hell alone!!"

ah

unread,
Mar 11, 2012, 5:06:36 PM3/11/12
to
On 3/11/2012 4:39 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:30:20 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/10/2012 5:50 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:47:59 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/9/2012 8:41 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:28:19 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/9/2012 12:17 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No on both the former, and the latter (as % can attest).
>>>>>
>>>>> Then I rephrase and request that you reanswer. Half of us have em, so whassafuckinproblem?
>>>>
>>>> The problem is that your newsreader cuts >5 legacy attributions, thus negates
>>>> contextual appreciation and understanding.
>>>
>>> WTF is that in English, and what has it to do with bollocks?
>>>
>>>>> Oops, spelling error: http://petersphotos.com/temp/fucking%20spelling.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Gee, and we've been telling you about the inadequacies of your newsreader for
>>>> what?, over five years now?
>>>
>>> Does yours have the word whassafuckinproblem in its dictionary?
>>
>> There is a colloquial add-on, but I just haven't been bothered to dl it.
>
> I just "add word" when I see something it doesn't have. Whassafuckinproblem is now a word.

Oh, that.

iirc, you can do that in MS Paint.

>
>> Anyway(s), I've not ever participated in an argument over the neologistic
>> qualities of newsreaders, so I'm somewhat at a loss for words.
>
> Neologistic is not a word, Opera says so.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Neologistic

ah

unread,
Mar 11, 2012, 5:07:06 PM3/11/12
to
On 3/11/2012 7:08 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:38:14 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/10/2012 5:50 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 02:57:25 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/9/2012 8:43 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:29:33 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/9/2012 12:18 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stop
>>>>>> that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no problem up my end: http://petersphotos.com/temp/wrapped.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Well, aren't We just the special one.
>>>
>>> No, the one who chose the decent news program.
>>
>> Oh, do twirl again!
>
> Stop chatting me up like that.

Are you flirtin' wif me?

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 11, 2012, 5:09:37 PM3/11/12
to
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:06:36 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/11/2012 4:39 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:30:20 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/10/2012 5:50 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:47:59 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/9/2012 8:41 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:

>>
>>>>

>>
>>>>

>>>>
>>

>>>>
>>

>>>>>
>>>>> The problem is that your newsreader cuts >5 legacy attributions, thus negates
>>>>> contextual appreciation and understanding.
>>>>
>>>> WTF is that in English, and what has it to do with bollocks?
>>>>

>>>>>
>>>>> Gee, and we've been telling you about the inadequacies of your newsreader for
>>>>> what?, over five years now?
>>>>
>>>> Does yours have the word whassafuckinproblem in its dictionary?
>>>
>>> There is a colloquial add-on, but I just haven't been bothered to dl it.
>>
>> I just "add word" when I see something it doesn't have. Whassafuckinproblem is now a word.
>
> Oh, that.
>
> iirc, you can do that in MS Paint.

Paint has no knowledge of words. Only pictures.

>>> Anyway(s), I've not ever participated in an argument over the neologistic
>>> qualities of newsreaders, so I'm somewhat at a loss for words.
>>
>> Neologistic is not a word, Opera says so.
>
> http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Neologistic

It's a word for geeky knowitalls like yourself.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

The microwave was invented after a researcher walked by a radar
tube and a chocolate bar melted in his pocket.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 11, 2012, 5:09:49 PM3/11/12
to
You started it.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

If breasts had no nipples, they'd be pointless.

ah

unread,
Mar 11, 2012, 10:02:04 PM3/11/12
to
On 3/11/2012 5:09 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:06:36 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/11/2012 4:39 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:30:20 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/10/2012 5:50 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:47:59 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/9/2012 8:41 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem is that your newsreader cuts >5 legacy attributions, thus negates
>>>>>> contextual appreciation and understanding.
>>>>>
>>>>> WTF is that in English, and what has it to do with bollocks?
>>>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gee, and we've been telling you about the inadequacies of your newsreader for
>>>>>> what?, over five years now?
>>>>>
>>>>> Does yours have the word whassafuckinproblem in its dictionary?
>>>>
>>>> There is a colloquial add-on, but I just haven't been bothered to dl it.
>>>
>>> I just "add word" when I see something it doesn't have. Whassafuckinproblem is now a word.
>>
>> Oh, that.
>>
>> iirc, you can do that in MS Paint.
>
> Paint has no knowledge of words. Only pictures.
>
>>>> Anyway(s), I've not ever participated in an argument over the neologistic
>>>> qualities of newsreaders, so I'm somewhat at a loss for words.
>>>
>>> Neologistic is not a word, Opera says so.
>>
>> http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Neologistic
>
> It's a word for geeky knowitalls like yourself.

I hereby postulate that peace is achieved through a mutual loss of words. AICMFP!

ah

unread,
Mar 11, 2012, 10:02:31 PM3/11/12
to
On 3/11/2012 5:09 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:07:06 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/11/2012 7:08 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:38:14 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/10/2012 5:50 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 02:57:25 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/9/2012 8:43 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, aren't We just the special one.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, the one who chose the decent news program.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, do twirl again!
>>>
>>> Stop chatting me up like that.
>>
>> Are you flirtin' wif me?
>
> You started it.

This is demon.local: a simple yes, or no, will do.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 12, 2012, 9:30:15 AM3/12/12
to
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:02:31 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/11/2012 5:09 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:07:06 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/11/2012 7:08 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:38:14 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/10/2012 5:50 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:

>>
>>>>

>>

>>>>
>>

>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, do twirl again!
>>>>
>>>> Stop chatting me up like that.
>>>
>>> Are you flirtin' wif me?
>>
>> You started it.
>
> This is demon.local: a simple yes, or no, will do.

You mean "I am ah, I is too simple to infer what you meant".

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

My ex-wife was temperamental.
90% temper and 10% mental.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 12, 2012, 9:30:17 AM3/12/12
to
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:02:04 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/11/2012 5:09 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:06:36 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/11/2012 4:39 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:30:20 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/10/2012 5:50 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:

>>
>>>>

>>
>>>>

>>

>>>>
>>

>>>>
>>

>>

>>>>>
>>>>> There is a colloquial add-on, but I just haven't been bothered to dl it.
>>>>
>>>> I just "add word" when I see something it doesn't have. Whassafuckinproblem is now a word.
>>>
>>> Oh, that.
>>>
>>> iirc, you can do that in MS Paint.
>>
>> Paint has no knowledge of words. Only pictures.
>>
>>>>> Anyway(s), I've not ever participated in an argument over the neologistic
>>>>> qualities of newsreaders, so I'm somewhat at a loss for words.
>>>>
>>>> Neologistic is not a word, Opera says so.
>>>
>>> http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Neologistic
>>
>> It's a word for geeky knowitalls like yourself.
>
> I hereby postulate that peace is achieved through a mutual loss of words. AICMFP!

I do not understand.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

What advice don't you want to hear from a doctor before an operation?
"Whatever you do, don't go into the light."

ah

unread,
Mar 13, 2012, 9:54:26 PM3/13/12
to
On 3/12/2012 9:30 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:02:04 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/11/2012 5:09 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:06:36 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/11/2012 4:39 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:30:20 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/10/2012 5:50 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is a colloquial add-on, but I just haven't been bothered to dl it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I just "add word" when I see something it doesn't have. Whassafuckinproblem is now a word.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, that.
>>>>
>>>> iirc, you can do that in MS Paint.
>>>
>>> Paint has no knowledge of words. Only pictures.
>>>
>>>>>> Anyway(s), I've not ever participated in an argument over the neologistic
>>>>>> qualities of newsreaders, so I'm somewhat at a loss for words.
>>>>>
>>>>> Neologistic is not a word, Opera says so.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Neologistic
>>>
>>> It's a word for geeky knowitalls like yourself.
>>
>> I hereby postulate that peace is achieved through a mutual loss of words. AICMFP!
>
> I do not understand.

No one speaks, no one fights.

Q.E.D.

ah

unread,
Mar 13, 2012, 9:55:26 PM3/13/12
to
On 3/12/2012 9:30 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:02:31 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/11/2012 5:09 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:07:06 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/11/2012 7:08 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 10:38:14 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/10/2012 5:50 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, do twirl again!
>>>>>
>>>>> Stop chatting me up like that.
>>>>
>>>> Are you flirtin' wif me?
>>>
>>> You started it.
>>
>> This is demon.local: a simple yes, or no, will do.
>
> You mean "I am ah, I is too simple to infer what you meant".

I can infer till the sheep come home, but that still doesn't set the record
straight.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 14, 2012, 9:27:07 AM3/14/12
to
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:54:26 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/12/2012 9:30 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:02:04 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/11/2012 5:09 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:06:36 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Oh, that.
>>>>>
>>>>> iirc, you can do that in MS Paint.
>>>>
>>>> Paint has no knowledge of words. Only pictures.
>>>>

>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Neologistic
>>>>
>>>> It's a word for geeky knowitalls like yourself.
>>>
>>> I hereby postulate that peace is achieved through a mutual loss of words. AICMFP!
>>
>> I do not understand.
>
> No one speaks, no one fights.
>
> Q.E.D.

Some folk don't speak, they just explode.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 14, 2012, 9:27:24 AM3/14/12
to
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:55:26 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/12/2012 9:30 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:02:31 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/11/2012 5:09 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:07:06 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/11/2012 7:08 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:

>>
>>>>

>>
>>>>
>>

>>>>
>>

>>>>>
>>>>> Are you flirtin' wif me?
>>>>
>>>> You started it.
>>>
>>> This is demon.local: a simple yes, or no, will do.
>>
>> You mean "I am ah, I is too simple to infer what you meant".
>
> I can infer till the sheep come home, but that still doesn't set the record
> straight.

What are you a fucking lawyer?

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

ah

unread,
Mar 14, 2012, 6:45:51 PM3/14/12
to
On 3/14/2012 9:27 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:54:26 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/12/2012 9:30 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:02:04 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/11/2012 5:09 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:06:36 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> iirc, you can do that in MS Paint.
>>>>>
>>>>> Paint has no knowledge of words. Only pictures.
>>>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Neologistic
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a word for geeky knowitalls like yourself.
>>>>
>>>> I hereby postulate that peace is achieved through a mutual loss of words. AICMFP!
>>>
>>> I do not understand.
>>
>> No one speaks, no one fights.
>>
>> Q.E.D.
>
> Some folk don't speak, they just explode.

This I have not seen.

ah

unread,
Mar 14, 2012, 6:46:32 PM3/14/12
to
On 3/14/2012 9:27 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:55:26 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/12/2012 9:30 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:02:31 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/11/2012 5:09 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:07:06 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/11/2012 7:08 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you flirtin' wif me?
>>>>>
>>>>> You started it.
>>>>
>>>> This is demon.local: a simple yes, or no, will do.
>>>
>>> You mean "I am ah, I is too simple to infer what you meant".
>>
>> I can infer till the sheep come home, but that still doesn't set the record
>> straight.
>
> What are you a fucking lawyer?

I can neither confirm nor deny that supposition.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 14, 2012, 8:48:22 PM3/14/12
to
Look on the news. They are normally Muslims.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

I had some words with my wife, and she had some paragraphs with me.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 14, 2012, 8:49:56 PM3/14/12
to
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:46:32 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/14/2012 9:27 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:55:26 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/12/2012 9:30 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:02:31 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/11/2012 5:09 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:

>>
>>>>

>>
>>>>

>>>>
>>

>>>>
>>

>>>>>
>>>>> This is demon.local: a simple yes, or no, will do.
>>>>
>>>> You mean "I am ah, I is too simple to infer what you meant".
>>>
>>> I can infer till the sheep come home, but that still doesn't set the record
>>> straight.
>>
>> What are you a fucking lawyer?
>
> I can neither confirm nor deny that supposition.

Would the first party be able to confirm that the third party is unable to vouch for the second party becoming inclined to support the fourth party in perhaps forming a committee meeting with the fifth and subsequent parties up to but not including the 378th party to consider whether or not it would be beneficial to ask you to reiterate that decision forthwith?

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

How do shepherds practice safe sex?
They paint an X on the back of the ones that kick!

ah

unread,
Mar 15, 2012, 9:43:58 PM3/15/12
to
On 3/14/2012 8:48 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:45:51 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/2012 9:27 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:54:26 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/12/2012 9:30 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:02:04 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/11/2012 5:09 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hereby postulate that peace is achieved through a mutual loss of words. AICMFP!
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not understand.
>>>>
>>>> No one speaks, no one fights.
>>>>
>>>> Q.E.D.
>>>
>>> Some folk don't speak, they just explode.
>>
>> This I have not seen.
>
> Look on the news. They are normally Muslims.

Would you say a greater number of Muslims explode rather than, say, those with
self-combustive tendencies?
--
/\_/|
=a-h=
\'I'|
|<|,,\_ {}
|[>,,/,\ ()
|[|,\_,,) }{
((J(=__/ Xx)
meow

ah

unread,
Mar 15, 2012, 9:44:59 PM3/15/12
to
On 3/14/2012 8:49 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:46:32 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/2012 9:27 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:55:26 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/12/2012 9:30 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:02:31 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/11/2012 5:09 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is demon.local: a simple yes, or no, will do.
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean "I am ah, I is too simple to infer what you meant".
>>>>
>>>> I can infer till the sheep come home, but that still doesn't set the record
>>>> straight.
>>>
>>> What are you a fucking lawyer?
>>
>> I can neither confirm nor deny that supposition.
>
> Would the first party be able to confirm that the third party is unable to vouch for the second party becoming inclined to support the fourth party in perhaps forming a committee meeting with the fifth and subsequent parties up to but not including the 378th party to consider whether or not it would be beneficial to ask you to reiterate that decision forthwith?

Uh, your line-length issue is rearing its ugly head, again

btw, there is no third party.

%

unread,
Mar 15, 2012, 10:01:57 PM3/15/12
to
>> <|,,\_ {}
>> [>,,/,\ ()
>> [|,\_,,) }{
> ((J(=__/ Xx)
> meow



its all just being blown out of proportion

Checkmate

unread,
Mar 15, 2012, 10:02:46 PM3/15/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!
Have you ever blown anything that was out of proportion?

--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
Hammer of Thor, Feb. 2012
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved

"its usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments
on the more intelligent person's , lack of intelligents"

-Dave Keating, AKA "Squiggles" the assworm, AKA %, explaining
intelligence

%

unread,
Mar 15, 2012, 10:33:55 PM3/15/12
to
have you ever not blown anything

Checkmate

unread,
Mar 15, 2012, 11:11:04 PM3/15/12
to
Do you always answer a question with a question?

%

unread,
Mar 15, 2012, 11:20:05 PM3/15/12
to
whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe what you want
anyway

Checkmate

unread,
Mar 15, 2012, 11:18:17 PM3/15/12
to
> whether i squawk or don't squawk it doesn't matter because you'll
> believe i squawked anyway

I can always count on it, Dave.

%

unread,
Mar 15, 2012, 11:43:18 PM3/15/12
to
if that's what you want to believe

Checkmate

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 1:05:22 AM3/16/12
to
In order to know more concerning Drill Guide Bushing, you might click on
the sources to guide you to definitely more details. You may also use the
research field to help make you additional content articles. If you wish
to help with this website, we would like to listen to the ideas! It will
be fantastic to have you discuss your thinking concerning Drill Guide
Bushing. Feel liberal to mail a contact in order to all of us.

%

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 9:57:19 AM3/16/12
to

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 1:48:58 PM3/16/12
to
Firstly, "issue" is a buzzword used by prats in offices, retry with something more specific.

Secondly, I've told you before, YOUR screen is of unknown width to me, I cannot possibly wrap where you want it to. YOU are free to wrap my message at any width before reading it. Any sensible computer will do this for you. Are you on AOL?

> btw, there is no third party.

But there is a 378th?

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

40,000 Americans are injured by toilets each year.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 1:50:57 PM3/16/12
to
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 01:43:58 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/14/2012 8:48 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:45:51 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/14/2012 9:27 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:54:26 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/12/2012 9:30 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
<snip>
>>
>>>>
>>
<snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> No one speaks, no one fights.
>>>>>
>>>>> Q.E.D.
>>>>
>>>> Some folk don't speak, they just explode.
>>>
>>> This I have not seen.
>>
>> Look on the news. They are normally Muslims.
>
> Would you say a greater number of Muslims explode rather than, say, those with
> self-combustive tendencies?

The above may intersect, draw a Venn diagram to show your idea.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Chaos will reign over order - it's easier to implement.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 1:51:22 PM3/16/12
to
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 02:33:55 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Checkmate wrote:
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> by Checkmate!
>>
>> First, check out what % said:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ah wrote:
>>>> On 3/14/2012 8:48 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:45:51 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
<snip>
>>>>>
<snip>
>>>>>
<snip>
>>>>>
>>>>> Look on the news. They are normally Muslims.
>>>>
>>>> Would you say a greater number of Muslims explode rather than, say,
>>>> those with self-combustive tendencies?
>>>>> <|,,\_ {}
>>>>> [>,,/,\ ()
>>>>> [|,\_,,) }{
>>>> ((J(=__/ Xx)
>>>> meow
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> its all just being blown out of proportion
>>
>> Have you ever blown anything that was out of proportion?
>
>
> have you ever not blown anything

Most men have not blown a cock.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

It's not the dress that makes your bum look big honey, it's the 30 cakes you ate yesterday.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 1:52:14 PM3/16/12
to
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:20:05 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Checkmate wrote:
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> by Checkmate!
>>
>> First, check out what % said:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>> posts by Checkmate!
>>>>
>>>> First, check out what % said:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ah wrote:
<snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> its all just being blown out of proportion
>>>>
>>>> Have you ever blown anything that was out of proportion?
>>>
>>>
>>> have you ever not blown anything
>>
>> Do you always answer a question with a question?
>
> whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe what you want
> anyway

You might as well not post then.


--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Remember when you were kid and you used to blow bubbles?
Well, I saw him the other day and he says hello.

Checkmate

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 2:18:50 PM3/16/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what Lieutenant Scott said:


>
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 01:43:58 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 3/14/2012 8:48 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> >> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:45:51 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 3/14/2012 9:27 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:54:26 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 3/12/2012 9:30 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> <snip>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>
> <snip>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No one speaks, no one fights.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Q.E.D.
> >>>>
> >>>> Some folk don't speak, they just explode.
> >>>
> >>> This I have not seen.
> >>
> >> Look on the news. They are normally Muslims.
> >
> > Would you say a greater number of Muslims explode rather than, say, those with
> > self-combustive tendencies?
>
> The above may intersect, draw a Venn diagram to show your idea.

It's asymptotic.

%

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 2:42:31 PM3/16/12
to
my question wasn't addressed to most men

%

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 2:43:41 PM3/16/12
to
Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:20:05 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Checkmate wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>> posts by Checkmate!
>>>
>>> First, check out what % said:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>> posts by Checkmate!
>>>>>
>>>>> First, check out what % said:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ah wrote:
> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> its all just being blown out of proportion
>>>>>
>>>>> Have you ever blown anything that was out of proportion?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> have you ever not blown anything
>>>
>>> Do you always answer a question with a question?
>>
>> whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe what
>> you want anyway
>
> You might as well not post then.


i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 2:37:40 PM3/16/12
to
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:18:50 -0000, Checkmate <Lunati...@the.edge> wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Lieutenant Scott said:
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 01:43:58 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 3/14/2012 8:48 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:45:51 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On 3/14/2012 9:27 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> >>>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:54:26 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On 3/12/2012 9:30 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> <snip>
>> >>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> <snip>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> No one speaks, no one fights.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Q.E.D.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Some folk don't speak, they just explode.
>> >>>
>> >>> This I have not seen.
>> >>
>> >> Look on the news. They are normally Muslims.
>> >
>> > Would you say a greater number of Muslims explode rather than, say, those with
>> > self-combustive tendencies?
>>
>> The above may intersect, draw a Venn diagram to show your idea.
>
> It's asymptotic.

That implies Muslims never have self combustive tendancies. Which is clearly bollocks.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

There once was a time when all people believed in god and the church ruled. This time was called the Dark Ages. -- Richard Lederer

Checkmate

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 2:41:44 PM3/16/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what % said:


>
> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:20:05 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Checkmate wrote:
> >>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >>> posts by Checkmate!
> >>>
> >>> First, check out what % said:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Checkmate wrote:
> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >>>>> posts by Checkmate!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> First, check out what % said:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ah wrote:
> > <snip>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> its all just being blown out of proportion
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Have you ever blown anything that was out of proportion?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> have you ever not blown anything
> >>>
> >>> Do you always answer a question with a question?
> >>
> >> whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe what
> >> you want anyway
> >
> > You might as well not post then.
>
>
> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do

i made you say that

%

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 2:54:15 PM3/16/12
to
if you want to believe you did go ahead believe it

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 2:55:28 PM3/16/12
to
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:43:41 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:20:05 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>> posts by Checkmate!
>>>>
>>>> First, check out what % said:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Checkmate wrote:

>> <snip>

>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> have you ever not blown anything
>>>>
>>>> Do you always answer a question with a question?
>>>
>>> whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe what
>>> you want anyway
>>
>> You might as well not post then.
>
>
> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do

What do you hope to achieve if noone listens?

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

An old black-and-white photograph of a man milking a cow was sent to a photo-finishing company.
The man was sitting behind the cow, and all that was visible of him were his legs and feet.
A note accompanying the order read: "This is the only picture I have of my great grandfather. Please move the cow so I can see what he looked like."

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 2:55:40 PM3/16/12
to
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:54:15 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Checkmate wrote:
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
>> by Checkmate!
>>
>> First, check out what % said:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:20:05 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Checkmate wrote:

>>>> <snip>

>>>>>
>>>>> whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe what
>>>>> you want anyway
>>>>
>>>> You might as well not post then.
>>>
>>>
>>> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do
>>
>> i made you say that
>
>
> if you want to believe you did go ahead believe it

I think therefore I am.


--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

"O'Ryan," asked the druggist, "did that mudpack I gave you improve your wife's appearance?"
"It did, surely," replied O'Ryan, "but it keeps fallin' off!"

%

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 3:12:47 PM3/16/12
to
Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:43:41 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:20:05 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>> posts by Checkmate!
>>>>>
>>>>> First, check out what % said:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>
>>> <snip>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> have you ever not blown anything
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you always answer a question with a question?
>>>>
>>>> whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe what
>>>> you want anyway
>>>
>>> You might as well not post then.
>>
>>
>> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do
>
> What do you hope to achieve if noone listens?


not believing does not equate not listening

%

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 3:13:17 PM3/16/12
to
Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:54:15 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Checkmate wrote:
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>> posts by Checkmate!
>>>
>>> First, check out what % said:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:20:05 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>
>>>>> <snip>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe
>>>>>> what you want anyway
>>>>>
>>>>> You might as well not post then.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do
>>>
>>> i made you say that
>>
>>
>> if you want to believe you did go ahead believe it
>
> I think therefore I am.


you very well may be

meowmix

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 3:47:15 PM3/16/12
to
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:37:40 -0000, "Lieutenant Scott" <n...@spam.com>
wrote:

>On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:18:50 -0000, Checkmate <Lunati...@the.edge> wrote:
>
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!
>>
>> First, check out what Lieutenant Scott said:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 01:43:58 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On 3/14/2012 8:48 PM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> >> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:45:51 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> On 3/14/2012 9:27 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> >>>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 01:54:26 -0000, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> On 3/12/2012 9:30 AM, Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>> >>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>
>>> <snip>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> No one speaks, no one fights.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Q.E.D.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Some folk don't speak, they just explode.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This I have not seen.
>>> >>
>>> >> Look on the news. They are normally Muslims.
>>> >
>>> > Would you say a greater number of Muslims explode rather than, say, those with
>>> > self-combustive tendencies?
>>>
>>> The above may intersect, draw a Venn diagram to show your idea.
>>
>> It's asymptotic.
>
>That implies Muslims never have self combustive tendancies. Which is clearly bollocks.

if they did and got on with it, it'd free up a hell of a lot of houses
here.


--
mhm x v i x i i i

January 2012 winner of the UNABOMBER SURPRISE

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 3:48:04 PM3/16/12
to
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:12:47 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:43:41 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:20:05 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Checkmate wrote:

>>
>>>> <snip>
>>

>>>>>
>>>>> whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe what
>>>>> you want anyway
>>>>
>>>> You might as well not post then.
>>>
>>>
>>> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do
>>
>> What do you hope to achieve if noone listens?
>
>
> not believing does not equate not listening

But you are falling on deaf ears, therefore nothing is achieved.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Lysdexia: a peech imspediment we live to learn with...

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 3:48:23 PM3/16/12
to
Then do not dismiss the power of thought.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Checkmate

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 3:54:58 PM3/16/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what Lieutenant Scott said:


>
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:12:47 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> >> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:43:41 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> >>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:20:05 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>
> >>
> >>>> <snip>
> >>
>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe what
> >>>>> you want anyway
> >>>>
> >>>> You might as well not post then.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do
> >>
> >> What do you hope to achieve if noone listens?
> >
> >
> > not believing does not equate not listening
>
> But you are falling on deaf ears, therefore nothing is achieved.

That pretty much sums up David Keating's life.

%

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 4:01:37 PM3/16/12
to
Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:12:47 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:43:41 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:20:05 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>> <snip>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe
>>>>>> what you want anyway
>>>>>
>>>>> You might as well not post then.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do
>>>
>>> What do you hope to achieve if noone listens?
>>
>>
>> not believing does not equate not listening
>
> But you are falling on deaf ears, therefore nothing is achieved.


no i'm falling on ears that chose to believe what they want to believe

%

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 4:02:08 PM3/16/12
to
Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:13:17 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:54:15 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>> posts by Checkmate!
>>>>>
>>>>> First, check out what % said:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do
>>>>>
>>>>> i made you say that
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> if you want to believe you did go ahead believe it
>>>
>>> I think therefore I am.
>>
>>
>> you very well may be
>
> Then do not dismiss the power of thought.


i don't see anywhere that i did

Checkmate

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 4:06:20 PM3/16/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what % said:


>
Why are you falling on ears? Are you drunk in a corn field?

Checkmate

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 4:07:00 PM3/16/12
to
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what % said:


>
> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:13:17 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:54:15 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Checkmate wrote:
> >>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
> >>>>> posts by Checkmate!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> First, check out what % said:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>>
> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do
> >>>>>
> >>>>> i made you say that
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> if you want to believe you did go ahead believe it
> >>>
> >>> I think therefore I am.
> >>
> >>
> >> you very well may be
> >
> > Then do not dismiss the power of thought.
>
>
> i don't see anywhere that i did

there are none so blind as those who cannot see

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 4:06:48 PM3/16/12
to
There are none here :-)

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

What does a Scotsman wear under his kilt?
Lipstick, if he's lucky.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 4:07:10 PM3/16/12
to
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:54:58 -0000, Checkmate <Lunati...@the.edge> wrote:

> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
> Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Lieutenant Scott said:
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:12:47 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> >> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:43:41 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> >>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:20:05 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >>>> <snip>
>> >>
>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe what
>> >>>>> you want anyway
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You might as well not post then.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do
>> >>
>> >> What do you hope to achieve if noone listens?
>> >
>> >
>> > not believing does not equate not listening
>>
>> But you are falling on deaf ears, therefore nothing is achieved.
>
> That pretty much sums up David Keating's life.

He can't even spell percent!

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 4:07:28 PM3/16/12
to
You sound like a preacher.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

"Have you read The Three Musketeers?"
"No, only one of them."

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 4:07:55 PM3/16/12
to
You said you did not care what people believed. Believing is a kind of thought.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

%

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 5:11:46 PM3/16/12
to
Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> by Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what Lieutenant Scott said:
>
>
>>
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:12:47 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:43:41 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:20:05 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe
>>>>>>> what you want anyway
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You might as well not post then.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do
>>>>
>>>> What do you hope to achieve if noone listens?
>>>
>>>
>>> not believing does not equate not listening
>>
>> But you are falling on deaf ears, therefore nothing is achieved.
>
> That pretty much sums up David Keating's life.


who's that

%

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 5:12:29 PM3/16/12
to
Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> by Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what % said:
>
>
>>
>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:12:47 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:43:41 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 03:20:05 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> whether i do or don't it doesn't matter because you'll believe
>>>>>>>> what you want anyway
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You might as well not post then.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you hope to achieve if noone listens?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> not believing does not equate not listening
>>>
>>> But you are falling on deaf ears, therefore nothing is achieved.
>>
>>
>> no i'm falling on ears that chose to believe what they want to
>> believe
>
> Why are you falling on ears? Are you drunk in a corn field?


if that's what you want to believe

%

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 5:12:54 PM3/16/12
to
Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:01:37 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:12:47 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:43:41 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you hope to achieve if noone listens?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> not believing does not equate not listening
>>>
>>> But you are falling on deaf ears, therefore nothing is achieved.
>>
>>
>> no i'm falling on ears that chose to believe what they want to
>> believe
>
> You sound like a preacher.

is that so

%

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 5:13:29 PM3/16/12
to
Checkmate wrote:
> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts
> by Checkmate!
>
> First, check out what % said:
>
>
>>
>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:13:17 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:54:15 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>>>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading
>>>>>>> posts by Checkmate!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> First, check out what % said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i don't let his beliefs or yours decide what i should do
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i made you say that
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if you want to believe you did go ahead believe it
>>>>>
>>>>> I think therefore I am.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> you very well may be
>>>
>>> Then do not dismiss the power of thought.
>>
>>
>> i don't see anywhere that i did
>
> there are none so blind as those who cannot see


%

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 5:14:14 PM3/16/12
to
Lieutenant Scott wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:02:08 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:13:17 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:54:15 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Checkmate wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if you want to believe you did go ahead believe it
>>>>>
>>>>> I think therefore I am.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> you very well may be
>>>
>>> Then do not dismiss the power of thought.
>>
>>
>> i don't see anywhere that i did
>
> You said you did not care what people believed. Believing is a kind
> of thought.



show me where i said i don't care

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 5:14:16 PM3/16/12
to
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:12:54 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:01:37 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:12:47 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:

>>
>>>>

>>

>>>>
>>

>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> not believing does not equate not listening
>>>>
>>>> But you are falling on deaf ears, therefore nothing is achieved.
>>>
>>>
>>> no i'm falling on ears that chose to believe what they want to
>>> believe
>>
>> You sound like a preacher.
>
> is that so

You have the characteristics of a badly written bot.

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

Bill Clinton thinks "harass" is two words.

Lieutenant Scott

unread,
Mar 16, 2012, 5:14:56 PM3/16/12
to
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:14:14 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 20:02:08 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:13:17 -0000, % <per...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lieutenant Scott wrote:

>>
>>>>

>>>>

>>>>
>>

>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> you very well may be
>>>>
>>>> Then do not dismiss the power of thought.
>>>
>>>
>>> i don't see anywhere that i did
>>
>> You said you did not care what people believed. Believing is a kind
>> of thought.
>
>
>
> show me where i said i don't care

I'm talking to a 286 with an "expert system".

--
http://petersparrots.com
http://petersphotos.com

G.A.Y. - Got Aids Yet?
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages