Well somebody told me
You had a boyfriend
Who looks like a girlfriend
That I had in February of last year
It's not confidential
I've got potential
Ready? Let's roll onto something new
Taking its toll and I'm leaving without you
Ready? Let's roll onto something new
But heaven ain't close in a place like this
Anything goes but don't blink you might miss
Cause heaven ain't close in a place like this
I said heaven ain't close in a place like this
Bring it back down, bring it back down tonight
Never thought I'd let a rumour ruin my moonlight
Well somebody told me
You had a boyfriend
Who looks like a girlfriend
That I had in February of last year
It's not confidential
I've got potential
A rushin', a rushin' around
Pace yourself from me
I said maybe baby please
But I just don't know now
Somebody told me
You had a boyfriend
Who looks like a girlfriend
That I had in February of last year
It's not confidential
I've got potential
A rushin', a rushin' around
As a true music fan of the 21st Century, you face a tough choice. Do you
talk yourself into musical obscurity, moaning about the uninventiveness of
"la musique d'aujourd'hui" until, before you know where you are, you're
attempting to class the latest chart effort as "Nu Italo with a hint of
Bootie-Funk" and all your friends have fucked off, or do you accept that a
pure, mass-influential genre only comes around every 10 to 15 years and
start to make the most of what's here, by defining decent music as that
which entertains people, rather than that which has less influence on
society than a Geoffrey Archer novel?
Knowing good sense when you see it, you plod on, determined to separate
those bands whose "we were influenced by..." press quote can roughly be
translated as "we stole this because we're untalented fucks", from those
who actually put their obvious influences to innovative good use.
Enter [the] Killers. A solitary nugget of 24 carat gold resting,
uncomfortably, amongst the silt.
If you let the fact that they're from Vegas put you off then you take the
soul out of soldier. Ok, so that works better vocally than in text but
let's not offend the vegetarians by splitting hares.
Debut album, Hot Fuss, does not gently tease your cock from your trousers
with the promise of original 'head' techniques, but rather it has you
begging for more of the same shit that just made you stain your boxers,
with previously undiscovered ease. The females among you may submit your
paraphrases, on a postcard, to... me.
WIP
I can't do it
I can't conceive
you're everything you're trying to make me believe
cause this show is
too well designed
too well to be held with only me in mind
And how am I different?
How am I different?
How am I different?
I can't do it
so move along
do you really want to wait until I prove you wrong?
And don't tell me--
let me guess
I could change it all around if I would just say yes
But how am I different?
How am I different?
How am I different?
And just one question before I pack--
when you fuck it up later,
do I get my money back?
I can't do it
and as for you--
can you in good conscience even ask me to
Cause what do you care
about the great divide
as long as you come down
on the winner's side
And how am I different?
How am I different?
How am I different?
Just one question before I pack--
when you fuck it up later,
do I get my money back?
Zen
>A rush
That reminds me, I saw Rush Friday night. Not bad for a bunch of old
CanaDuhians.
Like you rilly give a shit.
>[the] Killers:
>
>As a true music fan
fan of music
>of
in
> the 21st Century, you face a tough choice. Do you
>talk yourself into musical obscurity, moaning about the uninventiveness of
>"la musique d'aujourd'hui"
I'll say you do. It sucks nuts.
> until, before you know where you are, you're
>attempting to class the latest chart effort as "Nu Italo with a hint of
>Bootie-Funk" and all your friends have fucked off, or do you accept that a
>pure, mass-influential genre only comes around every 10 to 15 years and
>start to make the most of what's here, by defining decent music as that
>which entertains people, rather than that which has less influence on
>society than a Geoffrey Archer novel?
>
Jeffrey.
That sentence is a bit long.
The answer is that you grow out of thinking you have to like "the
newest thing" and realise there has been 50 years of rock n roll and a
lot of it is *new to you*.
>Knowing good sense when you see it, you plod on, determined to separate
>those bands whose "we were influenced by..." press quote can roughly be
>translated as "we stole this because we're untalented fucks", from those
>who actually put their obvious influences to innovative good use.
"bands"... "that"...
>Enter [the] Killers.
Love the [the]. That alone guarantees I wouldn't listen to them.
> A solitary nugget of 24 carat gold resting,
>uncomfortably, amongst the silt.
>
Among.
Maybe gravel rather than silt. I don't know too much about gold but in
films it's always panned from gravel.
>If you let the fact that
A cliche to avoid.
> they're from Vegas put you off then you take the
>soul out of soldier.
What?
> Ok, so that works better vocally than in text but
>let's not offend the vegetarians by splitting hares.
>
Trying to be smart has defeated good writing very much so.
>Debut album, Hot Fuss, does not gently tease your cock from your trousers
>with the promise of original 'head' techniques
What? I should fucking hope not. If I start feeling that way about New
Order I'm going to be worried, now they're all guys.
> but rather it has you
>begging for more of the same shit that just made you stain your boxers,
>with previously undiscovered ease. The females among you may submit your
>paraphrases, on a postcard, to... me.
>
>WIP
You're too old for juvenile posing, Paula. Drop the stuff about "head"
and shitting yourself. Try to communicate what you feel rather than
what you feel others should feel.
You often have the problem in your reviews that you talk down to your
reader. The reader is your friend.
Zen
with PR like this, you just KNOW this band has to SUCK.
Thank you. It's people like you who keep people like me in work. You ever
tried listening before you judge?
"Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com> wrote in message
news:Xns952CC9E3E...@207.14.113.17
> Morrigan <w...@privacy.net> wrote in
> news:Xns952BEDB384A00m1S5ch3ef@the- front-line:
> shut it.
No. You shut it.
fan of music.
'true' becomes more crap now too.
>>of
>
> in
in.
>> the 21st Century, you face a tough choice. Do you
>>talk yourself into musical obscurity, moaning about the
>>uninventiveness of "la musique d'aujourd'hui"
>
> I'll say you do. It sucks nuts.
Not all of it.
>> until, before you know where you are, you're
>>attempting to class the latest chart effort as "Nu Italo with a hint
>>of Bootie-Funk" and all your friends have fucked off, or do you accept
>>that a pure, mass-influential genre only comes around every 10 to 15
>>years and start to make the most of what's here, by defining decent
>>music as that which entertains people, rather than that which has less
>>influence on society than a Geoffrey Archer novel?
>>
>
> Jeffrey.
Maybe I was overestimating my friends, the reader...
http://www.geoffreyarcher.co.uk/
And maybe not. I'm sure ol' Geoffers is quite entertaining by comparison.
> That sentence is a bit long.
Aye.
> The answer is that you grow out of thinking you have to like "the
> newest thing" and realise there has been 50 years of rock n roll and a
> lot of it is *new to you*.
That's no kind of answer if you linger up your own arse, scanning the music
press in order to wow your friends with "new" musical tastes.
>>Knowing good sense when you see it, you plod on, determined to
>>separate those bands whose "we were influenced by..." press quote can
>>roughly be translated as "we stole this because we're untalented
>>fucks", from those who actually put their obvious influences to
>>innovative good use.
>
> "bands"... "that"...
So, essentially, becomes 'Bands that press quote'?
Needs a complete reword.
>>Enter [the] Killers.
>
> Love the [the]. That alone guarantees I wouldn't listen to them.
Expand.
>> A solitary nugget of 24 carat gold resting,
>>uncomfortably, amongst the silt.
>>
>
> Among.
Among.
> Maybe gravel rather than silt. I don't know too much about gold but in
> films it's always panned from gravel.
At that stage I was still sober enough to check the validity of "silt".
Maybe for reader recognition, but...
>>If you let the fact that
>
> A cliche to avoid.
Half of a sentence, or all of it? And why? Apart from being tired...
>> they're from Vegas put you off then you take the
>>soul out of soldier.
>
> What?
Lyrical reference. Things were getting blurry at that stage.
>> Ok, so that works better vocally than in text but
>>let's not offend the vegetarians by splitting hares.
>>
>
> Trying to be smart has defeated good writing very much so.
Hiccups right about then.
>>Debut album, Hot Fuss, does not gently tease your cock from your
>>trousers with the promise of original 'head' techniques
>
> What? I should fucking hope not. If I start feeling that way about New
> Order I'm going to be worried, now they're all guys.
Wobbly.
>> but rather it has you
>>begging for more of the same shit that just made you stain your
>>boxers, with previously undiscovered ease. The females among you may
>>submit your paraphrases, on a postcard, to... me.
>>
>>WIP
>
> You're too old for juvenile posing, Paula. Drop the stuff about "head"
> and shitting yourself. Try to communicate what you feel rather than
> what you feel others should feel.
Passed out.
> You often have the problem in your reviews that you talk down to your
> reader. The reader is your friend.
The article, in Word, didn't make it past "silt". Nor did my brain. Or
any other part of my physical being.
I liked Spirit Of Radio or whatever it was called.
> Not bad for a bunch of old
> CanaDuhians.
>
> Like you rilly give a shit.
Now stop being sore.
"Morrigan" <w...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Xns952CCB7AB401Dm1S5ch3ef@the-front-line
We have a famous author here in demon.local. He is called James Follett
and is often confused with that bloke Ken.
>Morrigan <w...@privacy.net> wrote in news:Xns952BEDB384A00m1S5ch3ef@the-
>front-line:
>
>shut it.
>
lick dog nipples.
Jade
"Reality is the easy part, denying reality takes a lot more effort...."
- Alexa "tequila tits" Cameron on being a kook.
Message-ID:1408b0dptk3l40h5i...@4ax.com
That's how little Rodney was breast fed.
Fuck I ain't sore. Just embarrassed that I attempted to have a
rational conversation with you.
/smacks head
>Dr Zen <gol...@hotmail.com> wrote
>> On 19 Jul 2004 22:45:08 GMT, Morrigan <w...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>>>[the] Killers:
>>>
>>>As a true music fan
>>
>> fan of music
>
>fan of music.
>
>'true' becomes more crap now too.
"true" is every bit as non-objective-personal-opinion-oriented as the
words "crap" and "sucks".
what's funny is how the "true fans" react to the words "crap" or
"sucks", uness of course, it is directed towards another rival band.
it's often a case of blind idolatry from the un-learned and
inexperience.
like standing up on a soapbox screaming, VANILLA REWLZ! CHOCOLATE
SUCKS! IF YOU LIKE CHOCOLATE, YOU SUCK!
or my personal favorite, "How DARE you diss MY band".
>
>>> the 21st Century, you face a tough choice. Do you
>>>talk yourself into musical obscurity, moaning about the
>>>uninventiveness of "la musique d'aujourd'hui"
>>
>> I'll say you do. It sucks nuts.
>
>Not all of it.
not all new music sucks. theres a bunch of good new music coming out
all the time, its just really difficult to find, buried under the
mind-boggling barrage of other new music.
>
>That's no kind of answer if you linger up your own arse, scanning the music
>press in order to wow your friends with "new" musical tastes.
"music press". now thats funny. they're always worth a laugh. it's
really too bad so many people actually pay attention to what they say.
>
>Needs a complete reword.
>
>>>Enter [the] Killers.
>>
>> Love the [the]. That alone guarantees I wouldn't listen to them.
hell, the title and the first sentence made me decide against them.
>Zachariah <o...@oo.oo> wrote in news:b6tqf01el9atvsko062e38611md0senrlv@zack:
>You should know, dad.
That's right, I am your daddi, boi.
why should i? i was working in the rock and roll industry probably
before any of these farts pooped in their diapers. Nothing new in that
bit of pablum.,... I hate PR. It killed the last band I was in.
Dont write a bunch of cliched bullshit about how great your goddamned
band is. Just fucking give the website and say, here, have a listen.
now that, I would have gone for.
>Daedalus <jad...@my-deja.com> wrote in
>news:l5sqf0plgq6ohk31q...@4ax.com:
>I haven't got a dog.
>
Oh. What do you have with nipples?
Jade
"Eddie" <Edwardappl...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hvtqf0dcrounfgna3...@4ax.com
>
> i was working in the rock and roll industry probably
> before any of these farts pooped in their diapers.
Did you know John Kaye?
"Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com> wrote in message
news:Xns952CD88F6...@207.14.113.17
> Daedalus <jad...@my-deja.com> wrote in
> news:j2uqf0p4p4okblj0f...@4ax.com:
> only that naked picture of you doing the rounds this week..
Can you dress a picture?
> mheh
Is that geek speak for laughter?
"Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com> wrote in message
news:Xns952CDB81D...@207.14.113.17
> "Wim Jay" <wi...@bluebottle.com> wrote in
> news:DjfLc.20095383$Id.33...@news.easynews.com:
> What's this then? quiz night or something?
Is it?
>Daedalus <jad...@my-deja.com> wrote in
>news:j2uqf0p4p4okblj0f...@4ax.com:
>only that naked picture of you doing the rounds this week..
>
That was not bad. But in the process, you admitted you don't have any
nipples, which made it as creepy as it was funny.
Jade
"Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com> wrote in message
news:Xns952CDC9AE...@207.14.113.17
> "Wim Jay" <wi...@bluebottle.com> wrote in
> news:lsfLc.20095737$Id.33...@news.easynews.com:
> can you do multichoice?
Why?
"Eddie" <Edwardappl...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eg2rf09tdfhbrafes...@4ax.com
I meant were you acquainted with him; were you friends with him; have you
ever heard of him? I ask because he was quite big in rock and roll too.
Allegedly.
>On 20 Jul 2004 20:22:01 GMT, "Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com>, wrote:
>
>>Daedalus <jad...@my-deja.com> wrote in
>>news:j2uqf0p4p4okblj0f...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On 20 Jul 2004 19:38:26 GMT, "Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com>, wrote:
>>>
>>>>Daedalus <jad...@my-deja.com> wrote in
>>>>news:l5sqf0plgq6ohk31q...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On 20 Jul 2004 18:55:29 GMT, "Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com>, wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Morrigan <w...@privacy.net> wrote in news:Xns952BEDB384A00m1S5ch3ef@the-
>>>>>>front-line:
>>>>>>
<snip crappy lyrics>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>shut it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> lick dog nipples.
>>>>
>>>>I haven't got a dog.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oh. What do you have with nipples?
>>
>>only that naked picture of you doing the rounds this week..
>>
>
>That was not bad. But in the process, you admitted you don't have any
>nipples, which made it as creepy as it was funny.
>
>Jade
Well actually little Rodney does have one. Also explains why he
doesn't date much.
"Zachariah" <o...@oo.oo> wrote in message
news:tu2rf0tf0i95vdk2d9nngbd1ms5pao9h7n@zack
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5fme8
ROLF! that was funny, Tit-head. Was it your self-portrait?
;o)
Ah. The embittered muso. As ten a penny as the crap journo.
> Dont write a bunch of cliched bullshit about how great your goddamned
> band is. Just fucking give the website and say, here, have a listen.
>
> now that, I would have gone for.
If I'd done that we wouldn't be having this fascinating conversation, now
would we?
"Morrigan" <w...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Xns952CE5D125318m1S5ch3ef@the-front-line
>
> We have Grant. He's often mistaken for an arse crevice.
Thanks! I've just remembered where I parked my bike.
I wish I could take away your pain, Zach.
> /smacks head
/smacks Zach's head too
Timperley.
Wee.
"Morrigan" <w...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Xns952CE6B3D587Cm1S5ch3ef@the-front-line
me /*smacks* Zach's head with my slipper.
"Morrigan" <w...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Xns952CE6D059E6Dm1S5ch3ef@the-front-line
Eh? I thought the next line should have been Moe, as in Eeenie, Meanie,
Minie, Mo! (I'm not very good at these cascade thingys.)
Well since you asked so politely...
There's a light that shines
On everything and everyone
And it shines so bright -
Brighter, even, than the sun"
That's what Minnie thinks
As she walks to meet her brother
Who's nearly two years older
On a Saturday night
He's DJing at some do
On the edge of town
On the night that Minnie Timperley died
It's such a beautiful world
And you're such a beautiful girl
So much that you want to try
The world wants to sleep with you tonight
But Minnie
Minnie, if I could
I would give you the rest of my life
How can a girl have sex
With these pathetic teenage wrecks?
Oh, football scarves
The girls drink halves
And her brother's crying
'Cos he has lost his decks
Outside, the air was cool
An older guy sitting in his car
Asked if Minnie needed a ride?
He thought he was still dangerous
(Paunchy, but dangerous)
On the night that Minnie Timperley died
It's such a beautiful world
You're such a beautiful girl
And he only did what he did
'Cause you looked like one of his kids
But Minnie
Minnie, if I could
I would give you the rest of my life
Oh, Minnie, I can feel the pain
Oh, Minnie, I can feel the pain
Oh, Minnie, I can feel the pain, the pain, the pain, the pain pain pain
pain yeah
Oh yeah
Oh yeah
Oh yeah...
> I thought the next line should have been Moe, as in Eeenie, Meanie,
> Minie, Mo! (I'm not very good at these cascade thingys.)
No one's very good at cascade thingys. Has no one told you how much they
suck yet? ;)
You is one hard geez.
Group hugz.
((((((((ZACH))))))))
"Morrigan" <w...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Xns952CE8ECDEAB4m1S5ch3ef@the-front-line
> "Wim Jay" <wi...@bluebottle.com> wrote
>> "Morrigan" <w...@privacy.net> wrote in message
>> news:Xns952CE6D059E6Dm1S5ch3ef@the-front-line
>>> "Wim Jay" <wi...@bluebottle.com> wrote
>>>>
That is a sad song, almost as sad as the year that Clayton Delaney died:
I remember the year that Clayton Delaney died
They said for the last two weeks that he suffered and cried
It made a big impression on me, although I was a barefoot kid
They said he got religion at the end and I'm glad that he did
Clayton was the best guitar picker in our town
I thought he was a hero and I used to follow Clayton around
I often wondered why Clayton, who seemed so good to me
Never took his guitar and made it down in Tenn-o-see
Well, Daddy said he drank a lot, but I could never understand
I knew he used to pick up in Ohio with a five-piece band
Clayton used to tell me, "Son you better put that old guitar away,
There ain't no money in it, it'll lead you to an early grave."
I guess if I'd admit it, Clayton taught me how to drink booze
I can see him half-stoned a-pickin' out the lovesick blues
When Clayton died I made him a promise, I was gonna carry on somehow
I'd give a hundred dollars if he could only see me now
I remember the year that Clayton Delaney died
Nobody ever knew it but I went out in the woods and I cried
Well, I know there's a lotta big preachers that know a lot more than I do
But it could be that the good Lord likes a little pickin' too
Yeah, I remember the year that Clayton Delaney died
>> I thought the next line should have been Moe, as in Eeenie, Meanie,
>> Minie, Mo! (I'm not very good at these cascade thingys.)
>
> No one's very good at cascade thingys. Has no one told you how much
> they suck yet? ;)
Yes, I usually just join in to keep in the Vicar's good books. He loves
his cascades.
>Zachariah <o...@oo.oo> wrote in
>news:tu2rf0tf0i95vdk2d9nngbd1ms5pao9h7n@zack:
>you sold me that zak helmet in good faith you low life dog. I want my money
>back, toe-rag.
No givum reefunds, Nipplelhead.
"Clyde B" <tehsa...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2m5jnpF...@uni-berlin.de
> "Eddie" <Edwardappl...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:hvtqf0dcrounfgna3...@4ax.com...
>> why should i? i was working in the rock and roll industry probably
>> before any of these farts pooped in their diapers. Nothing new in
>> that bit of pablum.,... I hate PR. It killed the last band I was in.
>>
>> Dont write a bunch of cliched bullshit about how great your goddamned
>> band is. Just fucking give the website and say, here, have a listen.
>
> You is one hard geez.
That's why I was asking if he knew John Kaye (aka Kunt Kaye) because KK
talks just like that!
>Morrigan <w...@privacy.net> wrote in news:Xns952CE6B3D587Cm1S5ch3ef@the-
>front-line:
>send him some preperation H
Flavored for all those special times when you kiss my ass.
<seeIcanbenice>
"Clyde B" <tehsa...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
/*kick* /*punch*/ *slap* /ZACH
That's the only hugz he's getting in demon.local - we're a *robust* group,
we are.
"Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com> wrote in message
news:Xns952CEB7B0...@207.14.113.17
> "Wim Jay" <wi...@bluebottle.com> wrote in
> news:TOfLc.1166485$ef4.1...@news.easynews.com:
>
>>
>>
>> "Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns952CDC9AE...@207.14.113.17
>>> "Wim Jay" <wi...@bluebottle.com> wrote in
>>> news:lsfLc.20095737$Id.33...@news.easynews.com:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:Xns952CDB81D...@207.14.113.17
>>>>> "Wim Jay" <wi...@bluebottle.com> wrote in
>>>>> news:DjfLc.20095383$Id.33...@news.easynews.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:Xns952CD88F6...@207.14.113.17
>>>>>>> Daedalus <jad...@my-deja.com> wrote in
>>>>>>> news:j2uqf0p4p4okblj0f...@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 20 Jul 2004 19:38:26 GMT, "Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com>, wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Daedalus <jad...@my-deja.com> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:l5sqf0plgq6ohk31q...@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Jul 2004 18:55:29 GMT, "Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com>, wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Morrigan <w...@privacy.net> wrote in
>>>>>>>>>>> shut it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> lick dog nipples.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I haven't got a dog.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh. What do you have with nipples?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> only that naked picture of you doing the rounds this week..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you dress a picture?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mheh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that geek speak for laughter?
>>>>>
>>>>> What's this then? quiz night or something?
>>>>
>>>> Is it?
>>>
>>> can you do multichoice?
>>
>> Why?
>
> I could be challenged, I might need kloos
Right. I'll take away A and D. That leaves you with B and C.
"Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com> wrote in message
news:Xns952CEA84A...@207.14.113.17
>
> Yeah, but you was on about nipple licking, i'll pay you 5 english
> pounds if you can find some geezer who can lick his own nipples... so
> mine don't count.. y'see?
You will lose if Craig Oldfield sees your post and takes up your
challenge. He has *huge* man-titties and wears a hammock to support them.
>Morrigan wrote :
>
>>Zachariah <o...@oo.oo> wrote
>>> That reminds me, I saw Rush Friday night.
>>
>>I liked Spirit Of Radio or whatever it was called.
>>
>>> Not bad for a bunch of old
>>> CanaDuhians.
>>>
>>> Like you rilly give a shit.
>>
>>Now stop being sore.
>
>Fuck I ain't sore. Just embarrassed that I attempted to have a
>rational conversation with you.
>
>/smacks head
*Joins queue*
>
>
>"Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com> wrote in message
>news:Xns952CC9E3E...@207.14.113.17
>No. You shut it.
Shut it you slag.
>In article <no6rf0hbfkhpc0vomfk7at4mij9ldg1nsc@zack>, Zachariah <o...@oo.oo>
>wrote:
>You sightless, bungling fat-bellied slimeball.
You infected, shit-reeking, hamster-draining diarrhea cultivator.
>In article <9l6rf0tfr6661r3fom20frgnlnt1gugavl@zack>, Zachariah <o...@oo.oo>
>wrote:
>Fuck off you parasitical, psychoneurotic frankenstein.
Eat shit you foul-smelling, rim-engulfing turd bowler.
>Dr Zen <gol...@hotmail.com> wrote
>> On 19 Jul 2004 22:45:08 GMT, Morrigan <w...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>>>[the] Killers:
>>>
>>>As a true music fan
>>
>> fan of music
>
>fan of music.
>
>'true' becomes more crap now too.
I did selected crap bits.
>>>of
>>
>> in
>
>in.
>
>>> the 21st Century, you face a tough choice. Do you
>>>talk yourself into musical obscurity, moaning about the
>>>uninventiveness of "la musique d'aujourd'hui"
>>
>> I'll say you do. It sucks nuts.
>
>Not all of it.
Most. Nearly all. I won't split hares with you.
>>> until, before you know where you are, you're
>>>attempting to class the latest chart effort as "Nu Italo with a hint
>>>of Bootie-Funk" and all your friends have fucked off, or do you accept
>>>that a pure, mass-influential genre only comes around every 10 to 15
>>>years and start to make the most of what's here, by defining decent
>>>music as that which entertains people, rather than that which has less
>>>influence on society than a Geoffrey Archer novel?
>>>
>>
>> Jeffrey.
>
>Maybe I was overestimating my friends, the reader...
>
>http://www.geoffreyarcher.co.uk/
See what I mean about talking down to your reader?
>And maybe not. I'm sure ol' Geoffers is quite entertaining by comparison.
>
>> That sentence is a bit long.
>
>Aye.
>
>> The answer is that you grow out of thinking you have to like "the
>> newest thing" and realise there has been 50 years of rock n roll and a
>> lot of it is *new to you*.
>
>That's no kind of answer if you linger up your own arse, scanning the music
>press in order to wow your friends with "new" musical tastes.
Are you writing only for teens?
>>>Knowing good sense when you see it, you plod on, determined to
>>>separate those bands whose "we were influenced by..." press quote can
>>>roughly be translated as "we stole this because we're untalented
>>>fucks", from those who actually put their obvious influences to
>>>innovative good use.
>>
>> "bands"... "that"...
>
>So, essentially, becomes 'Bands that press quote'?
No. Bands whose... press quote... from those that actually...
>Needs a complete reword.
No. I was just showing that the "those" refers to "bands", which
should take a nonpersonal pronoun.
>
>>>Enter [the] Killers.
>>
>> Love the [the]. That alone guarantees I wouldn't listen to them.
>
>Expand.
Great music is quite simply not made by cunts who think it's cool to
put "the" in brackets.
>>> A solitary nugget of 24 carat gold resting,
>>>uncomfortably, amongst the silt.
>>>
>>
>> Among.
>
>Among.
>
>> Maybe gravel rather than silt. I don't know too much about gold but in
>> films it's always panned from gravel.
>
>At that stage I was still sober enough to check the validity of "silt".
>Maybe for reader recognition, but...
Sorry, you may have been sober when you checked its validity but you
were pissed when you wrote this post, and I haven't a clue what you're
on about. You mean you checked it, and silt's okay? So far as I know,
gold is panned out of alluvium, which can include silt but is not
restricted to it.
>>>If you let the fact that
>>
>> A cliche to avoid.
>
>Half of a sentence, or all of it? And why? Apart from being tired...
"the fact that"
Just never use it.
>
>>> they're from Vegas put you off then you take the
>>>soul out of soldier.
>>
>> What?
>
>Lyrical reference. Things were getting blurry at that stage.
Oh.
>
>>> Ok, so that works better vocally than in text but
>>>let's not offend the vegetarians by splitting hares.
>>>
>>
>> Trying to be smart has defeated good writing very much so.
>
>Hiccups right about then.
>
>>>Debut album, Hot Fuss, does not gently tease your cock from your
>>>trousers with the promise of original 'head' techniques
>>
>> What? I should fucking hope not. If I start feeling that way about New
>> Order I'm going to be worried, now they're all guys.
>
>Wobbly.
>
>>> but rather it has you
>>>begging for more of the same shit that just made you stain your
>>>boxers, with previously undiscovered ease. The females among you may
>>>submit your paraphrases, on a postcard, to... me.
>>>
>>>WIP
>>
>> You're too old for juvenile posing, Paula. Drop the stuff about "head"
>> and shitting yourself. Try to communicate what you feel rather than
>> what you feel others should feel.
>
>Passed out.
>
>> You often have the problem in your reviews that you talk down to your
>> reader. The reader is your friend.
>
>The article, in Word, didn't make it past "silt". Nor did my brain. Or
>any other part of my physical being.
Maybe you should only post articles that did involve your brain?
Zen
>Eddie <Edwardappl...@yahoo.com> wrote
>> On 20 Jul 2004 18:56:47 GMT, Morrigan <w...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Eddie <Edwardappl...@yahoo.com> wrote
>>>> On 19 Jul 2004 22:45:08 GMT, Morrigan <w...@privacy.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>[the] Killers:
>>>>>
>>>>>As a true music fan of the 21st Century, you face a tough choice.
>>>>>Do you talk yourself into musical obscurity, moaning about the
>>>>>uninventiveness of "la musique d'aujourd'hui" until, before you know
>>>>>where you are, you're attempting to class the latest chart effort as
>>>>>"Nu Italo with a hint of Bootie-Funk" and all your friends have
>>>>>fucked off, or do you accept that a pure, mass-influential genre
>>>>>only comes around every 10 to 15 years and start to make the most of
>>>>>what's here, by defining decent music as that which entertains
>>>>>people, rather than that which has less influence on society than a
>>>>>Geoffrey Archer novel?
>>>>>
>>>>>Knowing good sense when you see it, you plod on, determined to
>>>>>separate those bands whose "we were influenced by..." press quote
>>>>>can roughly be translated as "we stole this because we're untalented
>>>>>fucks", from those who actually put their obvious influences to
>>>>>innovative good use.
>>>>>
>>>>>Enter [the] Killers. A solitary nugget of 24 carat gold resting,
>>>>>uncomfortably, amongst the silt.
>>>>>
>>>>>If you let the fact that they're from Vegas put you off then you
>>>>>take the soul out of soldier. Ok, so that works better vocally than
>>>>>in text but let's not offend the vegetarians by splitting hares.
>>>>>
>>>>>Debut album, Hot Fuss, does not gently tease your cock from your
>>>>>trousers with the promise of original 'head' techniques, but rather
>>>>>it has you begging for more of the same shit that just made you
>>>>>stain your boxers, with previously undiscovered ease. The females
>>>>>among you may submit your paraphrases, on a postcard, to... me.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> with PR like this, you just KNOW this band has to SUCK.
>>>
>>>Thank you. It's people like you who keep people like me in work. You
>>>ever tried listening before you judge?
>>
>>
>> why should i? i was working in the rock and roll industry probably
>> before any of these farts pooped in their diapers. Nothing new in that
>> bit of pablum.,... I hate PR. It killed the last band I was in.
>
>Ah. The embittered muso. As ten a penny as the crap journo.
>
>> Dont write a bunch of cliched bullshit about how great your goddamned
>> band is. Just fucking give the website and say, here, have a listen.
>>
>> now that, I would have gone for.
>
>If I'd done that we wouldn't be having this fascinating conversation, now
>would we?
>
no my dear; we might be discussing the MUSIC - instead of you calling
me names.
think about it.
harder.
John Kaye has every right to say whatever he wants about any rock and
roll band.
sure, everybody has a right to say what they want... Kaye, i'll listen
and respect his opinion.
>Zachariah <o...@oo.oo> wrote in news:no6rf0hbfkhpc0vomfk7at4mij9ldg1nsc@zack:
>You mean kick it, besides, prep H don't come in bucket size.
Actual it does. We re-label it as Pete's Fish & Chips Special Sauce
and export it to the uk.
>Zachariah <o...@oo.oo> wrote in
>news:dgcrf0hi0pkf4ngvijaj5qgl66me1318sg@zack:
>you should listen to Elmer, she's got a good point.
>
At the top of her head. Your momma?
>Hardrock Gunter <shutity...@g.com> wrote in
>news:pj9rf0tcauo9123fm...@4ax.com:
>Room for another?
There's allus room in a zach smacking queue. The end of it is 15
miles thattaway...................................>
S'ok tho' mate, I've saved you a spot here at the front.
Well I like how there was more crap in the trolly bit. That was
perceptive.
>
>>>>of
>>>
>>> in
>>
>>in.
>>
>>>> the 21st Century, you face a tough choice. Do you
>>>>talk yourself into musical obscurity, moaning about the
>>>>uninventiveness of "la musique d'aujourd'hui"
>>>
>>> I'll say you do. It sucks nuts.
>>
>>Not all of it.
>
> Most. Nearly all. I won't split hares with you.
You will and you did. I've the innards, covered in silt, to prove it.
What new music have you listened to then? Perhaps you're looking in the
wrong places. Perhaps you're just not looking at all, which I often find
is the case with people who claim to have a handle on everything "new". I
listen to a lot of new stuff - I would never presume to have heard even a
fraction of what's actually out there.
>>>> until, before you know where you are, you're
>>>>attempting to class the latest chart effort as "Nu Italo with a hint
>>>>of Bootie-Funk" and all your friends have fucked off, or do you
>>>>accept that a pure, mass-influential genre only comes around every
>>>>10 to 15 years and start to make the most of what's here, by
>>>>defining decent music as that which entertains people, rather than
>>>>that which has less influence on society than a Geoffrey Archer
>>>>novel?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Jeffrey.
>>
>>Maybe I was overestimating my friends, the reader...
>>
>>http://www.geoffreyarcher.co.uk/
>
> See what I mean about talking down to your reader?
Yeah, but it's you.
>>And maybe not. I'm sure ol' Geoffers is quite entertaining by
>>comparison.
>>
>>> That sentence is a bit long.
>>
>>Aye.
>>
>>> The answer is that you grow out of thinking you have to like "the
>>> newest thing" and realise there has been 50 years of rock n roll and
>>> a lot of it is *new to you*.
>>
>>That's no kind of answer if you linger up your own arse, scanning the
>>music press in order to wow your friends with "new" musical tastes.
>
> Are you writing only for teens?
Apart from the mums and dads who might find it rolled up inside a sweaty
trainer, at the bottom of their school bag, yeah.
>>>>Knowing good sense when you see it, you plod on, determined to
>>>>separate those bands whose "we were influenced by..." press quote
>>>>can roughly be translated as "we stole this because we're untalented
>>>>fucks", from those who actually put their obvious influences to
>>>>innovative good use.
>>>
>>> "bands"... "that"...
>>
>>So, essentially, becomes 'Bands that press quote'?
>
> No. Bands whose... press quote... from those that actually...
>
>>Needs a complete reword.
>
> No. I was just showing that the "those" refers to "bands", which
> should take a nonpersonal pronoun.
Good point.
>>>>Enter [the] Killers.
>>>
>>> Love the [the]. That alone guarantees I wouldn't listen to them.
>>
>>Expand.
>
> Great music is quite simply not made by cunts who think it's cool to
> put "the" in brackets.
They don't.
I'm the cunt who put it in brackets.
>>>> A solitary nugget of 24 carat gold resting,
>>>>uncomfortably, amongst the silt.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Among.
>>
>>Among.
>>
>>> Maybe gravel rather than silt. I don't know too much about gold but
>>> in films it's always panned from gravel.
>>
>>At that stage I was still sober enough to check the validity of
>>"silt". Maybe for reader recognition, but...
>
> Sorry, you may have been sober when you checked its validity but you
> were pissed when you wrote this post, and I haven't a clue what you're
> on about. You mean you checked it, and silt's okay? So far as I know,
> gold is panned out of alluvium, which can include silt but is not
> restricted to it.
>
>>>>If you let the fact that
>>>
>>> A cliche to avoid.
>>
>>Half of a sentence, or all of it? And why? Apart from being tired...
>
> "the fact that"
>
> Just never use it.
Tell me why.
But I hate being ignored.
Listen, sugar. Here's how it went. You said they must be crap; I can't be
arsed arguing with ya.
If you want to discuss their music, rather than making ignorant statements,
I'll gladly talk with ya.
> think about it.
>
> harder.
>
>
>
Lend us some, would ya?
This is not the pie queue.
hth
On the field I remember you were incredible
Hey shut up, hey shut up, yeah
On the field I remember you were incredible
Hey shut up, hey shut up, yeah
On the match with the boys, you think you're all alone
With the pain that you drain from love
In a car with a girl, promise me she's not your world
Cause Andy, you're a star
Leave your number on the locker and I'll give you a call
Hey shut up, hey shut up, yeah
Leave your legacy in gold on the plaques that line the hall
Hey shut up, hey shut up, yeah
On the streets, such a sweet face jumping in town
In the staff when the verdict is in
In a car with a girl, promise me she's not your world
Cause Andy, you're a star
In nobody's eyes but mine
Andy, you're a star
In nobody's eyes but mine
Andy, you're a star
In nobody's eyes
In nobody's eyes but mine
>>> I thought the next line should have been Moe, as in Eeenie, Meanie,
>>> Minie, Mo! (I'm not very good at these cascade thingys.)
>>
>> No one's very good at cascade thingys. Has no one told you how much
>> they suck yet? ;)
>
> Yes, I usually just join in to keep in the Vicar's good books. He loves
> his cascades.
You selfless peep, you.
Should be due another visit soon then.
Be sure to pull the stick out of your ass before you insert the
suppository. Oh, but you'd need to lose 90 lbs. before you could
reach your ass. Have Clodia do it.
Zach, isn't there a cock, somewhere, missing your powers of suction?
>Zachariah <o...@oo.oo> wrote
>> Morrigan wrote :
>>
>>>"Rod DĄno" <s...@off.com> wrote
>>>> Morrigan <w...@privacy.net> wrote in news:Xns952CE6B3D587Cm1S5ch3ef@the-
>>>> front-line:
>>>>
>>>>> Zachariah <o...@oo.oo> wrote
>>>>>> Morrigan wrote :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Zachariah <o...@oo.oo> wrote
>>>>>>>> That reminds me, I saw Rush Friday night.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I liked Spirit Of Radio or whatever it was called.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Not bad for a bunch of old
>>>>>>>> CanaDuhians.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Like you rilly give a shit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Now stop being sore.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fuck I ain't sore. Just embarrassed that I attempted to have a
>>>>>> rational conversation with you.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wish I could take away your pain, Zach.
>>>>
>>>> send him some preperation H
>>>
>>>Lend us some, would ya?
>>
>> Be sure to pull the stick out of your ass before you insert the
>> suppository. Oh, but you'd need to lose 90 lbs. before you could
>> reach your ass. Have Clodia do it.
>
>Zach, isn't there a cock, somewhere, missing your powers of suction?
Paula, isn't there a guy, with a lantern, looking for his Land Cruiser
up your cunt?
Thought not. No one misses you, do they Zach? Except maybe those posers
on their jet skis. They're wondering where the little fat bloke, in the
anorak, has gone. The one who used to stand, longingly, on the shore,
saying stuff like "wish I could have one of them and be as cool as you"
You'll get swollen ankles.
>Zachariah <o...@oo.oo> wrote in
>news:vhdtf01dh8qbp89cpd5mqt0l8o11al64nr@zack:
>Then we sell it to the yank tourists, marvellous.
If we could get rid of every yank off our beautiful island it'd be
able to float to a warmer climate. That's all that's stopping us,
thousands of fat fucking yanks. Buncha cunts.
>Hardrock Gunter <god...@nk.com> wrote in
>news:t1ktf09e830iaqugh...@4ax.com:
>Superb, i'll lend you my ian beefy botham replica cricket bet, unless
>you've a better twatting stick?
That's if we ever get our turn. Those at the front started smacking
him and couldn't bring themselves to stop. I'm getting fed up of
waiting.
>Morrigan <w...@privacy.net> wrote in news:Xns952DE7695845Bm1S5ch3ef@the-
>front-line:
>I right fancy a pukka chicken and mushroom pie, with chips, fried in
>dripping.
Chips fried in anything other than beef dripping are just shit.
Fuck. I was meant to do that last month.
Balls.