Is Al Gore the answer????
Read this amazing article at
TIME.COM
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1725678,00.html
excerpt from article:
Which brings us back to Al Gore. Pish-tosh, you say, and you're
probably right. But let's play a little. Let's say the elders of the
Democratic Party decide, when the primaries end, that neither Obama
nor Clinton is viable. Let's also assume--and this may be a real stretch
--that such elders are strong and smart enough to act. All they'd have
to do would be to convince a significant fraction of their
superdelegate friends, maybe fewer than 100, to announce that they
were taking a pass on the first ballot at the Denver convention, which
would deny the 2,025 votes necessary to Obama or Clinton. What if they
then approached Gore and asked him to be the nominee, for the good of
the party--and suggested that he take Obama as his running mate? Of
course, Obama would have to be a party to the deal and bring his 1,900
or so delegates along.
GO AL GORE in
2008!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GO AL GORE in
2008!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GO AL GORE in
2008!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!