Fwd: Joint US campaigners' Statement on US Landmine Policy

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Robin Collins

unread,
Feb 21, 2020, 10:09:20 AM2/21/20
to DEMINING

"Efforts to enhance the “safety” of landmines, including the development of so-called non-persistent or “selfdestruct” mines, ignores the fact that they remain indiscriminate. Regardless of the length of their lifespan, they cannot distinguish between a combatant or a civilian while active. If the self-destruct or self-deactivation mechanisms were to fail, they would remain lethal and the potential exists for the components to be repurposed into improvised explosive devices."

---------- Forwarded message ---------


pdf here, press release here  

Joint Statement on the Trump Administration's New Landmine Policy

In response to the January 31st announcement by the White House of the Department of Defense’s new landmine policy, we, the undersigned organizations, strongly condemn the Trump Administration’s decision to lift existing United States prohibitions against the use of landmines. We urge the White House and Department of Defense (DOD) to reconsider and take steps to join the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty. We urge Congress to take immediate measures to block the deployment of landmines and prohibit the development, production, or other acquisition of new antipersonnel landmines.

Landmines are inherently indiscriminate weapons that maim and kill long after conflicts end. Over the past twenty years, the world has rejected antipersonnel landmines through the Mine Ban Treaty – to which 164 countries are states parties, including every other member of NATO. While still not a signatory, the U.S. has functionally adhered to several provisions of the Mine Ban Treaty – except those that would prohibit the U.S. from ordering the use of landmines on the Korean peninsula. This new landmine policy starkly sets the U.S. apart from its allies and has drawn international condemnation, including from the European Union.

The United States has not used antipersonnel landmines since 1991, excluding the use of a single munition in 2002; it has not exported them since 1992 and has not produced them since 1997. In the last five years, only the government forces of Syria, Myanmar, and North Korea, as well as non-state actors in conflict areas, have used landmines. Of the more than 50 countries that once produced landmines, 41 have ceased production. Under this new landmine policy, the U.S. will rejoin a small handful of mine-producing countries. This is not company the U.S. should keep.

Decades after combatants have retreated or laid down arms, landmines continue to threaten civilian lives and undermine the development of post-conflict communities. Farmers cannot farm, children cannot attend school, businesses cannot thrive, and whole communities are displaced. After mild flooding or frequent rain, previously mapped mines can be uprooted and moved to new locations, reintroducing danger to unknowing civilians and destroying the progress of previous mapping efforts.

Landmines are capable of inflicting unspeakable destruction and harm on their victims – projecting metal fragments into deep wounds, destroying one or more limbs, causing burns, traumatic brain injuries, blindness and deafness, and of course fatally wounding through decapitation, blood loss or other horrific means.

Efforts to enhance the “safety” of landmines, including the development of so-called non-persistent or “selfdestruct” mines, ignores the fact that they remain indiscriminate. Regardless of the length of their lifespan, they cannot distinguish between a combatant or a civilian while active. If the self-destruct or self-deactivation mechanisms were to fail, they would remain lethal and the potential exists for the components to be repurposed into improvised explosive devices.

The way in which landmines are delivered has changed over time. Rather than being planted and mapped by hand, U.S. mines would be dropped from aircraft or deployed through artillery – indiscriminately scattering them over wide unmarked terrain. This could cause civilian harm, including to humanitarian aid workers and peacekeepers who have no way of knowing if they are in a mined area or where mines might be placed.

The International Campaign to Ban Landmines and its American coordinator Jody Williams received the 1997 Nobel Peace Prize for their efforts to bring about the Mine Ban Treaty. We are proud to be part of the mine ban movement, which continues to make a massive contribution towards global peace and security. Under the provisions of the Treaty, large swaths of territories have been cleared and put back to productive uses. While there are still too many casualties annually, we have seen a dramatic decline since the Treaty came into being. To roll back the progress the global community has made would not only be a tragedy but an affront to the dignity of landmine survivors around the world. 

Signed,

United States Campaign to Ban Landmines member organizations:

American Friends Service Committee

Amnesty International USA

Arms Control Association

Center for Civilians in Conflict

Church of the Brethren, Office of Peacebuilding and Policy

Doctors of the World USA

Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

Friends Committee on National Legislation

Global Ministries of the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) and the United Church of Christ

Human Rights Watch

Humanity & Inclusion

Landmines Blow!

Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns

National Council of Churches

Physicians for Human Rights

Presbyterian Church (USA)

PSALM: Proud Students Against Landmines and Cluster Bombs

Roots of Peace

Saferworld, Washington Office

The United Methodist Church – General Board of Church and Society

Washington Office on Latin America

West Virginia Campaign to Ban Landmines

Women's Action for New Directions

Women's International League for Peace and Freedom

Other U.S. organizations:

Alliance for Peacebuilding

Association of University Centers on Disabilities

Central United Church of Christ

Childhood Education International

Columban Center for Advocacy and Outreach

CORE Group

Educators' Institute for Human Rights

The Episcopal Church

Global Campaign for Education-US

Global Communities

Global Health Partners

HealthRight International

Hesperian Health Guides

Human Rights First

InterAction

Latin America Working Group

Mennonite Central Committee U.S. Washington Office

Mercy Corps

Nonviolence International

Norwegian Refugee Council USA

Peace Direct

Plan International USA

Rukmini Foundation

Union for Reform Judaism

United Church of Christ, Justice and Witness Ministries

United Starts Campaign for Burma

Watchlist on Children and Armed Conflict

Win Without War

Women in International Security (WIIS)

Women's Refugee Commission

World Renew 

Non-U.S. organizations:

AWO International e.V.

Centre for Adolescents and Women's Health Initiative (CAWHI), Ghana

Conflict and Environment Observatory

Human Security Network in Latin America and the Caribbean Region (SEHLAC)

Medecins du Monde Germany (Aerzte der Welt)

Public Policy Association (APP), Argetina

War Child 



Andy Smith

unread,
Feb 21, 2020, 12:00:49 PM2/21/20
to demi...@googlegroups.com
Thanks Robin. Your bit is good. There are parts of the entire statement that I would dispute – but not its purpose for a moment.
 
Meantime, does anyone recognise these?
 
new_mines5
 
The picture was taken in Al-Bayda, Yemen.
 

They appear to marry a PMN fuze with a sort of expanded PPM-2 body... and variant pressure plates?

 

I first encountered improvised mines in the ‘90s in Angola, then Cambodia, then Afghanistan, then Tamil Sri Lanka (first encounter of true volume production), Iraq, Myanmar, and so on. But I do get the impression that the ‘volume production’ thing is far greater since the treaty made them harder to buy.

 

Regards,
Andy



www.nolandmines.com
www.ddasonline.com

--
--
You have received this message because you are subscribed to the Humanitarian Demining forum - which is a forum for the discussion of all Mine Action topics - ranging from EOD and technical aspects of mines and ERW to field demining, survey, MRE, Advocacy, Campaigning and Victim's Assistance.
 
To post to this group, send an email to demi...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
demining-u...@googlegroups.com

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Humanitarian Demining" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to demining+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/demining/CAKes%3DnHyXxURsiV6pcNh4DSZ8RkLKH9Yo361zACvvigJ25jz7w%40mail.gmail.com.
new_mines5[1].jpg

Robin Collins

unread,
Feb 21, 2020, 12:20:58 PM2/21/20
to DEMINING
not written by me, this was the US campaign statement, which is pretty good in my view also.
Robin

Robert Keeley

unread,
Feb 21, 2020, 12:40:15 PM2/21/20
to demi...@googlegroups.com
Hi all

IMHO the Korean argument has never been valid.

The mines under discussion in 1997 were M14, and god knows what condition they’d be in now. 

But even in 1997 Seoul was only a few km from the DMZ. It’s hard to see how anyone would have the time to get them out of store and in the ground before a NK human wave would be in Seoul.

I think that they were put on the table as a bargaining chip to save GATOR. Of course we’ll never know.

Bob



On 21 Feb 2020, at 15:09, Robin Collins <robi...@gmail.com> wrote:


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages