[Deluge] #165: Share ratio incorrect in v0.5.8.9

9 views
Skip to first unread message

Deluge

unread,
Apr 14, 2008, 12:25:12 PM4/14/08
to delug...@googlegroups.com
#165: Share ratio incorrect in v0.5.8.9
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: TomTerrific | Owner: markybob
Type: bug | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: 0.5.x | Version: 0.5.8.7
Keywords: ratio, share |
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Just downloaded the src and built the latest version of deluge and it's
running well.

But looks like there is a bug in how the share ratio is calculated.

'''Version:''' deluge, 0.5.8.9, source downloaded and built.[[BR]]

'''Env:''' Ubuntu, 8.04 Beta (Kernel 2.6.24-16-386 32b), all
current updates installed.[[BR]]

'''H/W:''' Pentium 4, 1.4G [[BR]]



'''How to reproduce:'''

I started a new deluge session with four paused torrents with fast resume
data. None of the torrents had downloaded or uploaded any data yet.

Started downloading on the torrents.

Examine information for a torrent. The amount of data listed as uploaded
and downloaded looks OK.

But the share ratio is incorrect.

For example the download amount is 80.5 MiB (80.5 MiB) and the uploaded
amount is 80.5 MiB (80.5 MiB) and the ratio is displaying as 1.684.

--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.deluge-torrent.org/ticket/165>
Deluge <http://deluge-torrent.org/>
Deluge project

Deluge

unread,
May 2, 2008, 3:11:05 PM5/2/08
to delug...@googlegroups.com
#165: Share ratio incorrect in v0.5.8.9
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: TomTerrific | Owner: markybob
Type: bug | Status: closed
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: 0.5.x | Version: 0.5.8.7
Resolution: fixed | Keywords: ratio, share
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by markybob):

* status: new => closed
* resolution: => fixed

--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.deluge-torrent.org/ticket/165#comment:1>
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages