A couple extra goodies are part of B10. I changed some keyboard
handling and added support for newer keyboards (allowing you to use
the Fn modifier instead of the Caps Lock to trigger Mac keyboard
shortcuts).
--
Mark Munz
unmarked software
http://www.unmarked.com/
I'll let others chime in on this, but I believe you compile your macro
set, then use Ultra Options to make it the default set. You can also
save it as a task file as well.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 3:38 PM, <doc...@aol.com> wrote:
> OK, if customized macro sets are no problem, then the only residual issue is
> my not remembering how to set up a macro file as the default set. I'm sure I
> had notes to myself once upon a time but, alas, they are no more.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Munz <unma...@gmail.com>
> To: dej...@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 11:29 pm
> Subject: [Deja IIx] Re: Beta2010
Unfortunately, I have given away all but a couple of them (which are
for my own library). The Primer actually only deals with UM in the
AW3-era, so some things have changed.
But back to the basics.
Load up a AWP file that contain your macros. Call up the TimeOut Menu
(use the keystroke button, since many Macs remap OA-Esc to bring up
Front Row). Select UltraMacros Compiler.. follow appropriate prompts.
Mark
BTW, can Deja IIx be made
bigger on the screen or is it a fixed area of screen real estate?
3. ??mystery feature for the future??
Just a little additional trivia.
>
> Deja IIx directly mimics the screen pixels of the Apple II. Changing
> the zoom just makes all the pixels bigger. This is slightly different
> than the original Deja ][, which used to use pure text to display its
> screen.
>
> The advantages of the new setup:
>
> 1. proper perspective keeps the A2 screen from being too wide.
> 2. mouse text characters are supported
> 3. ??mystery feature for the future??
>
> Just a little additional trivia.
Does this mean that A2 graphics support is possible in the future?
Like, Superfonts or Graph from the Timeout series? ;-)
--Steve
Besides, SuperFonts and Graph, the more important feature is AfterWork
graphic screen savers. :P
It is a possibility down the road -- but there are still many
obstacles, so don't get your hopes up too much.
Just trying to instigate some chatter!
--Steven Nelson
>
> Right now, no font is being specified when you save the RTF. That's an
> easy enough fix. What would you like? Monaco 10? Courier 14? Courier
> 12? (need font & size)
Courier 12 would do fine. As you perfect printing, size could be
determined from the CI setting :-)
Monoco would also work if Courier causes trouble. I am printing
stuff aligned in columns, so mono-spaced font is the easy way to keep
stuff aligned.
--Steve
>
> Check your updates..
>
> I already added an option to use the System's preferred Mono-space
> font. :)
Thanks! How does one set the System's perferred Mono-space font?
--Steve
In a spreadsheet, if a cell was blank I wanted to fill it in with a
lookup value, otherwise just keep whatever value was in the cell. A
simple version of my formula for cell e3 is : @if(@isblank(e3),@lookup
(d3,b2..b48),e3)
The problem is, the true clause is always taken, regardless if e3 is
blank or not. After a recalc, e3 always takes on the lookup value
even if another value was already there. Oh yeah, by value I mean
text, not a number. Column B has ordered integer values, C has
suggested text, D has integer values and E has text, some cells of
which are blank. I just want to fill in the blank cells. I realize
this is coming close to circular reference, when a cell refers to
itself, but to my logic it should work. My intent was to copy the e3
formula down the column, and then have the blank cells filled in.
But this destroyed the original values in the nonblank E cells.
Anyone see the error of my logic.
--Steve
>
> I'm a bit rusty on AW Spreadsheet rules. To verify if it is a bug in
> D2 or not, I suggest trying the same formula on a pure emulator and/or
> the real thing (if you got it).
>
> You might also just test the @isblank() function (without the @if
> stuff) to see if it is evaluating as you expect.
Good news. It was a logic error on my part, not D2/AW5. The formula
works fine if put in column F, not E. I just wasn't thinking far
enough ahead.
Duh!
--Steve