HILLARY'S STAR APPEAL FADING
Jo
Mar 2007 15:47:32 -0500
From: Dick Morris Reports <DickMorr...@vote.com>
Subject: HILLARY'S STAR APPEAL FADING
HILLARY'S STAR APPEAL FADING
By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN
Published on FoxNews.com on March 29, 2007.
It's now obvious that Hillary Clinton's negatives are rising among
American voters. A Harris Interactive survey says that a majority will
not vote for her, and a Gallup poll this week finds her favorability
among Democratic primary voters dropping from 82 percent in January,
to 74 percent in March.
By itself, this slippage would not be fatal. But it begs the key
question: Why is Hillary dropping?
Usually a candidate only falls in the polls when she is attacked by
her rivals, or is the object of a major scandal. Yet, Obama and
Edwards are treating her with kid gloves - avoiding even the most
gentile of criticisms. So noteworthy are their all-positive campaigns,
that when Obama's fund-raiser, David Geffen, knocked Bill for his
pardons, it became the central campaign event in January.
And, for once in her life, Hillary is not currently on the griddle for
any scandal. There are no daily exposes of her financial or Bill's
marital misconduct. Nobody is hitting Hillary.
The real bad news for her campaign is that Hillary is losing support -
not due to any attacks on her, but because people are watching her
wage her positive campaign, and are concluding that they just don't
like her.
It is Hillary's own campaign appearances that are driving up her
negatives!
That's the worst possible news for a campaign. When your main
instrument - the candidate - creates negatives in her wake, you're in
big trouble. You can always rebut an attack that comes in from the
other side - but how do you fix things when your own candidate's
campaigning is building up her unfavorables?
Basically, voters are seeing that Hillary is a phony. With her
posturing on Iraq, and her evasions of her previous positions in favor
of the war, she sounds as contradictory and dissimulating as she is.
To watch her try to explain her positions on the war is actually
amusing. She voted for the war - but now claims she only wanted to
strengthen the hands of the U.N. inspectors. She even supported it
after she learned there were no WMDs, but now wants a total withdrawal
of our troops - except for those she would leave there to keep the
Iranians out and hunt down al Qaeda. She voted to cut off funds if the
troops are not pulled out, but she doesn't really want to cut off the
funding, etc., etc...
No politician looks their best when they are evasive, and Hillary
looks worse than most.
The Clinton campaign clearly is dying to switch Clintons, and feature
the charismatic Bill and downplay the candidate herself. But the more
they put the former president out there, the more people realize that
Hillary ain't Bill. In effect, voters are echoing Lloyd Bentsen's
famous put-down of Quayle in their 1984 vice presidential debate, when
Dan tried to invoke the image of John Kennedy in his own defense.
Americans this year are saying, "We know Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton is
a friend of ours. And Hillary, you're no Bill Clinton."
Generally, when the son or daughter of a famous politician strikes out
on his or her own, the old man fades into the background. President
Bush-41 was noticeable absent while his son ran for his old job. Most
politicians are anxious to avoid the comparison between their nascent
skills, and the more developed and polished presentation of their
fathers. But, by putting Bill out there next to Hillary, we are
treated to a daily reminder of the huge difference between them.
He's warm. She's not. He's funny. She's not. He's charismatic. Her
circumstances are charismatic, but she, clearly, is not. Bill is
intuitive. Hillary's lips move as she dances - each step is right but
there is no innate sense of rhythm or beat.
Bill Clinton has an infinite range of poses to strike on a public
platform: charming, ingratiating, determined, empathetic, committed,
sincere, humorous, angry, self-righteous. He can turn on whatever
affect suits the purpose. But Hillary has only two gears - park and
straight ahead. She knows nothing but direct, strident, shrill
advocacy when a microphone is in her hand. On talk shows, she has
managed to develop a charming, smiling, giggly persona. But after
repeated exposure, it is wearing thin.
Will all this doom Hillary? Probably not. Her ace in the hole is the
vast infusion of new single women voters she will attract to the
polling booths on Election Day, who are voting for the first time. All
current polling excludes these women from its sample because they do
not now say they are likely to vote, or aren't even registered yet.
But, by the time Oprah beats the drums for Hillary, they will realize
a woman is running and will turn out to support her candidacy.
But if Hillary doesn't get her act together, even these new voters may
not be enough to save her.
________________________________________________________________________
PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL TO FRIENDS AND FAMILY WHO MAY BE INTERESTED
IN DICKMORRISREPORTS!
TO SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE TO DICKMORRISREPORTS:
If you have received this email from a friend and want to receive free
copies of all of Dick Morris' and Eileen McGann's commentaries, sign
up at www.dickmorris.com.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE AUTOMATICALLY FROM DICKMORRISREPORTS:
Please use the "REMOVE ME FROM THE LIST" link at the bottom of this
email to unsubscribe.
Please do not reply to the DickMorrisReports mailbox to unsubscribe.
This mailbox is for comments only.
THANK YOU!
***Copyright Eileen McGann and Dick Morris 2007***
Remove me from the list
Update your info