In factor Graph a node is represent (p1_id,p2_id) but not (p1_name,p2_name),why?

[james Chou]

in deepdive factor graph a candidate is (p1_id,p2_id) ,why not  (p1_name,p2_name) , actually p1_name may have many ids  in different sentences. And the result ouput a expectation for every (p1_id,p2_id), but what I want is the expectation of  (p1_name,p2_name), 

does someone can tell me why not  (p1_name,p2_name)  as a candidate ?

[Jaeho Shin]

Yes.  Great point, James.  The example shows you a mention-level relation extraction.  You can build entity-level models for linking/resolution on top of the mentions.  It's a different task that requires other work.

~Jaeho

On Jun 7, 2018, at 01:42, james Chou <northcap...@gmail.com> wrote:

in deepdive factor graph a candidate is (p1_id,p2_id) ,why not  (p1_name,p2_name) , actually p1_name may have many ids  in different sentences. And the result ouput a expectation for every (p1_id,p2_id), but what I want is the expectation of  (p1_name,p2_name), 

does someone can tell me why not  (p1_name,p2_name)  as a candidate ?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deepdive-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to deepdive-user...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/deepdive-users/214d20d3-fa5c-4754-a6ee-dd8f4e125f25%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.