Hi all,
We'd like to share our comment on Oprea’s (2024) recent AER paper.
We examine the behavioral incentive compatibility of his simplicity equivalent elicitation.
We would appreciate any comments!
SSRN link: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5315786
Title: Behavioral Incentive Compatibility of Preference Elicitation Mechanisms
Abstract: We propose a test of behavioral incentive compatibility (BIC) of preference elicitation mechanisms, obvious monotonicity (OM). Applying this to Oprea's (2024a) "mirror" experiment, (intended to challenge the behavioral foundations of risk preferences) we show that the elicitation method itself violates BIC. First, we show that simplicity equivalent elicitation fails OM: 55% of subjects assign a lower value to 90 boxes of $25 than to 10 boxes of $25. Second, the original mirror anomalies are primarily driven by the random choices of subjects who violate OM. Third, among those who satisfy OM, simplicity equivalents are much closer to expected values. In light of the evidence, we propose that simplicity equivalents can serve as a test of BIC in future experiments.