python2.1-pgsql ?

[Tille, Andreas]

On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:

> the version of psycopg currently in Incoming is built against
> python2.1-egenix-mxdatetime and works perfectly. the old mx packages
> without 'egenix' in the name are deprecated and should be avoided. (i
> think they will be removed from the archive upon no other packages
> depending on them.)
Thanks! I hope python2.1-pgsql will follow soon.

Kind regards

Andreas.

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org

[Federico Di Gregorio]

On Wed, 2001-11-14 at 13:57, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I´ve checked BTS and found a bug filed against python2-pgsql that it
> has to be replaced by python2.1-pgsql. Unfortunately this bug is not
> resolved yet. I tried to build a local package from source but it
> depends from python2-mxdatetime. The bug against this package is
> resolved by
>
> Please remove python2-mxdatetime from the archives (both testing and
> unstable); it is obsolete and replaced by other packages.
>
> Could anybody tell me which packages I need to build a local python2.1-pgsql?
> Does anybody perhaps have such packages? Moreover I also need
> python2.1-psycopg, which has the same problem. There is a hint on
> using python2.x-engenix-mxdatetime instead of python2-mxdatetime.

the version of psycopg currently in Incoming is built against
python2.1-egenix-mxdatetime and works perfectly. the old mx packages
without 'egenix' in the name are deprecated and should be avoided. (i
think they will be removed from the archive upon no other packages
depending on them.)

ciao,
federico

--
Federico Di Gregorio
Debian GNU/Linux Developer & Italian Press Contact f...@debian.org
INIT.D Developer f...@initd.org
Don't dream it. Be it. -- Dr. Frank'n'further