dpkg to support new sh architectures

[YAEGASHI Takeshi]

Hi and happy new year,

It seems there is no objection against dpkg getting to support four
different architectures for sh. I wish to see these changes in both
1.9 and 1.10 branches.

Other patches for dpkg-architecture.pl and enquiry.c should be more
discussed here and introduced into 1.10 branch first.

Index: archtable
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/dpkg/dpkg/archtable,v
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -r1.20 archtable
--- archtable 2001/10/21 17:58:07 1.20
+++ archtable 2001/12/29 20:16:57
@@ -35,13 +35,10 @@
i386-gnu0.2 hurd-i386 undefined
ia64-linux-gnu ia64 ia64
ia64-unknown-linux ia64 ia64
-sh-linux-gnu sh sh
-sheb-linux-gnu sheb sheb
-shel-linux-gnu sh sh
-sh3-linux-gnu sh sh
-sh4-linux-gnu sh sh
-sh3eb-linux-gnu sheb sheb
-sh4eb-linux-gnu sheb sheb
+sh3-linux-gnu sh3 sh3
+sh4-linux-gnu sh4 sh4
+sh3eb-linux-gnu sh3eb sh3eb
+sh4eb-linux-gnu sh4eb sh4eb
hppa-linux-gnu hppa hppa
hppa1.1-linux-gnu hppa hppa
hppa2.0-linux-gnu hppa hppa
Index: scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/dpkg/dpkg/scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl,v
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -r1.24 dpkg-architecture.pl
--- scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl 2001/10/21 17:58:07 1.24
+++ scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl 2001/12/29 20:16:58
@@ -56,8 +56,10 @@
'powerpc', 'powerpc-linux',
'mips', 'mips-linux',
'mipsel', 'mipsel-linux',
- 'sh', 'sh-linux',
- 'sheb', 'sheb-linux',
+ 'sh3', 'sh3-linux',
+ 'sh4', 'sh4-linux',
+ 'sh3eb', 'sh3eb-linux',
+ 'sh4eb', 'sh4eb-linux',
'hppa', 'hppa-linux',
'hurd-i386', 'i386-gnu',
's390', 's390-linux',
@@ -96,7 +98,6 @@

s/(?:i386|i486|i586|i686|pentium)(.*linux)/i386$1/;
s/ppc/powerpc/;
- s/sh[34]/sh/;
return $_;
}

--
YAEGASHI Takeshi <t...@keshi.org> <tak...@yaegashi.jp> <yaeg...@dodes.org>

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dp...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org

[YAEGASHI Takeshi]

Hi,

At Tue, 1 Jan 2002 14:22:34 +0100,
Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> Previously YAEGASHI Takeshi wrote:
> > It seems there is no objection against dpkg getting to support four
> > different architectures for sh. I wish to see these changes in both
> > 1.9 and 1.10 branches.
>

> commited to HEAD now. I haven't added it to the v1_9 branch since
> I highly doubt we'll make another release from that branch.

Thanks for quick response. But don't you forget this one?

Index: scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/dpkg/dpkg/scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl,v

retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -r1.26 dpkg-architecture.pl
--- scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl 2002/01/01 13:16:37 1.26
+++ scripts/dpkg-architecture.pl 2002/01/01 13:36:00
@@ -98,7 +98,6 @@

s/(?:i386|i486|i586|i686|pentium)(.*linux)/i386$1/;
s/ppc/powerpc/;
- s/sh[34]/sh/;
return $_;
}

And, do you mean that the next dpkg release is to be 1.10?

> > Other patches for dpkg-architecture.pl and enquiry.c should be more
> > discussed here and introduced into 1.10 branch first.
>

> Only introduced in 1.10 even, 1.9 is maintenance only.

I see. That seems reasonable to me.