ok to upload cython 0.10.3-1?
Ondrej Certik
is it ok if I upload 0.10.3-1? E.g. will it break the sage build (or
anything else)?
Or should I wait after the Lenny release.
Ondrej
Tim Abbott
embedded cython 0.9.8, and the current version used by Sage is 0.10.3, so
that'll be what I'll want when I upgrade to Sage 3.3.0.
-Tim Abbott
mabshoff
On Feb 8, 8:35 pm, Tim Abbott <tabb...@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> Should be fine for sage purposes; the Sage 3.0.5 in sid is using the
> embedded cython 0.9.8, and the current version used by Sage is 0.10.3, so
> that'll be what I'll want when I upgrade to Sage 3.3.0.
going to happen in 3.3 though.
I am curious what happened between 0.10.3-1 and the previous 0.10.3
release?
> -Tim Abbott
Cheers,
Michael
Tim Abbott
> Yeah, but we might bump to Cython 0.11 once they release. This is not
> going to happen in 3.3 though.
OK.
> I am curious what happened between 0.10.3-1 and the previous 0.10.3
> release?
There was no upstream 0.10.3-1 release; 0.10.3-1 is the first Debian
version of the 0.10.3 upstream release; everything after the "-" is the
Debian component of the version number. One needs separate version space
for Debian and upstream releases for the same reason that Sage adds a .p1
to .spkg version, namely, to be able to update the packaging or patches
applied on top of the same upstream release.
-Tim Abbott
mabshoff
> > Yeah, but we might bump to Cython 0.11 once they release. This is not
> > going to happen in 3.3 though.
>
> OK.
3.0.5. The largest changes are certainly the removal of all the
javascript code from the ext repo to their own set of spkgs and the
addition of TinyMCE. Aside from that there were many version bumps and
numerous bug fixes and improvements, so I would not recommend for
anyone to run 3.0.5 at the moment. We should probably start another
thread once you are updating the deb packages to sort out the issues
you are going to run into.
3.3 will be out by the middle of the week. All but one show stopper
are under control and we will release with that one show stopper in
place since it has existed for the last 9 months. 3.4 will see the
ReST switch, so exciting things for Sage are in the pipeline.
> > I am curious what happened between 0.10.3-1 and the previous 0.10.3
> > release?
>
> There was no upstream 0.10.3-1 release; 0.10.3-1 is the first Debian
> version of the 0.10.3 upstream release; everything after the "-" is the
> Debian component of the version number. One needs separate version space
> for Debian and upstream releases for the same reason that Sage adds a .p1
> to .spkg version, namely, to be able to update the packaging or patches
> applied on top of the same upstream release.
to some extend.
> -Tim Abbott
Tim Abbott
> Note that a bunch of spkg related things went into the tree since
> 3.0.5. The largest changes are certainly the removal of all the
> javascript code from the ext repo to their own set of spkgs and the
> addition of TinyMCE. Aside from that there were many version bumps and
> numerous bug fixes and improvements, so I would not recommend for
> anyone to run 3.0.5 at the moment. We should probably start another
> thread once you are updating the deb packages to sort out the issues
> you are going to run into.
tinymce is already in Debian, so this should be relatively easy to deal
with. I also note ghmm is new, which I will have to package for Debian.
> 3.3 will be out by the middle of the week. All but one show stopper
> are under control and we will release with that one show stopper in
> place since it has existed for the last 9 months. 3.4 will see the
> ReST switch, so exciting things for Sage are in the pipeline.
Okay. What's ReST?
-Tim Abbott
mabshoff
On Feb 8, 10:10 pm, Tim Abbott <tabb...@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, mabshoff wrote:
> > Note that a bunch of spkg related things went into the tree since
> > 3.0.5. The largest changes are certainly the removal of all the
> > javascript code from the ext repo to their own set of spkgs and the
> > addition of TinyMCE. Aside from that there were many version bumps and
> > numerous bug fixes and improvements, so I would not recommend for
> > anyone to run 3.0.5 at the moment. We should probably start another
> > thread once you are updating the deb packages to sort out the issues
> > you are going to run into.
>
> tinymce is already in Debian, so this should be relatively easy to deal
> with. I also note ghmm is new, which I will have to package for Debian.
> > 3.3 will be out by the middle of the week. All but one show stopper
> > are under control and we will release with that one show stopper in
> > place since it has existed for the last 9 months. 3.4 will see the
> > ReST switch, so exciting things for Sage are in the pipeline.
>
> Okay. What's ReST?
devel/doc from LaTeX to Rest.
This requires the following spkg, all of which ought to be already in
Debian:
* pygments
* jinja
* docutils
* sphinx
> -Tim Abbott
Cheers,
Michael
Tim Abbott
Yeah, they are. I noticed them as standard on
<http://sagemath.org/packages/standard/>, but I guess they're not actually
used for everything yet?
-Tim Abbott
mabshoff
about two months. There are about 12MB diffs via the patches at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&milestone=sage-3.4
and unless something goes wrong we will have a 3.4 with ReST in about
10 days. We currently need a bunch of reviews to get them in, but this
is supposed to happen post 3.3.final.
> -Tim Abbott
Cheers,
Michael
Ondrej Certik
> Hi!
>
> Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> is it ok if I upload 0.10.3-1? E.g. will it break the sage build (or
>> anything else)?
>
No, not at all. Let's wait then.
Ondrej