Hi
Starting a new connector for a new tenant is a straightforward task; however, the process becomes more complex when you want to merge connectors. This isn't really something we support for two concurrently running connectors capturing changes at two independent positions where the expected structures for tables may could be different due to recent schema changes.
Furthermore, because changes are being captured independently, you run the risk of having a gap in the data or duplicates, depending on how the two connectors interpret overlapping positions. So while you can use the `recovery` snapshot mode to try and merge these two independent connectors, there can be side effects of doing so, and you may then need to rely on incremental or blocking snapshots to deal with any data gap should that occur.
I'd recommend to avoid any issues where you may need to re-take a snapshot, using per-tenant connectors may be the better alternative.