Anil,
Great you found your own answer and thanks for sharing it!
That being said, it's surprising to see this base64 based representation for a UUID column, I'm wondering why we don't use a regular string representation like "40e6215d-b5c6-4896-987c-f30f3678f608" as done for UUID for other connectors. Can you log an issue at
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/DBZ for getting this adjusted?
@Bingqin: would be curious to learn about your thoughts on this one too. Does anything speak against simply changing this format? Given the connector is in "incubation" status right now, it's not a concern in terms of our general stability promises.
Thanks,
--Gunnar