tvshowclassics

[chris.fo...@gmail.com]

An interesting exchange of sorts has occurred between me and a user
calling himself, "tvshowclassics." Challenging AnnaAgainstAtheists on
a particular video comment section resulted in the comment being
disallowed by this user, and a reply asking that I debate the issue of
dialectics. The video comment section, at the time, seemed to allow
only tvshowclassics to post his comments, which is fine, and Anna's
praising comments that did nothing to add to any discussion.

I pointed out to tvshowclassics that he didn't seem to know anything
about dialectics and his refusal to allow the post marked him as a
coward.

That comment was disallowed, as well, and the video now appears as
"private," even though a follow up message INVITED me to discuss the
issue as long as it would be a discussion of dialectics.

Since the video is "private," I can neither see the video nor
participate in any discussion of "dialectics," and I cannot see
comments, either.

However, tvshowclassics did reply to me in that video comment
section. Apparently, he does not know that the comments show up in a
feature in my account.

"This coming from who has never even heard of dialectics.'

tvshowclassics merely repeats to me the charge that I posted to him.
From what little I was seeing in the videos, he is markedly ignorant
of dialectics. Of course, though he has presumed to challenge me on
the issue, the video and its comment sections are now "private" and I
can't see them, let alone participate in any kind of discussion or
debate. The invitation to discuss the matter was, therefore, bogus
and dishonest.

"LOL! no! your the coward, hating on a nice girl like Ana.

No one hates AnnaAgainstAtheists. If I had an emotion of any kind, it
would be pity, coupled with a sad disgust at the influence of mindless
religion on one so young.

It is not unusual for religious people to presume that challenging and
exposing their errors and irrational thinking constitutes "hate," but
a rational person would see, quickly, that it is Anna who hates. And
in a remarkable example of projection, the next statement to me is:

"It's clear you have a crush on Anna."

Such foolishness from yet another adolescent who likely has this
"crush," himself - enough so to make the video private so that
exchanges between he and Anna cannot be seen.

Even if Anna wasn't far too young for me, she is simply far too
irrational to be attractive to any but those who share her irrational
viewpoints. Unlike our friend, tvshowclassics, I know that there is
more to a person than the superficiality that Anna demonstrates.

"Maybe if you weren't such a jerk you could a nice Christian girl."

I'm not sure what "you could a nice Christian girl" means.
tvshowclassics has demonstrated issues with writing enough times, but,
of course, I'm a "jerk" because I dare to challenge Anna's comments
and assertions. Anna feels the same way. This is also an adolescent
thinking pattern.

"Maybe then you'd thank God. But no you chose to hate God, you forfeit
your blessing."

As usual, the simple-minded religious person conflates atheism with a
hatred for God; but it's difficult to hate what one does not believe
to exist. I don't hate God any more than I hate Santa Claus.

But religious people must construct their straw men, because they can
never actually deal with the true arguments presented to them.

I suspect that I'll hear no more from tvshowclassics. Even my attempt
to respond on his main channel has been blocked. It is clear that
this is another religious person who is incapable of intelligent
debate.