The denials of Josiah Avraham Ben Morgan HaNasi II, alias the ExposingCondells

[chris.fo...@gmail.com]

I have received a couple of comments about some of my entries into the
Pat Condell "Was Jesus Gay" video comment section.

Josiah's many sock puppets have been exposed many times in the months
since he was banned from Pat Condell's many channel comment area, and
it appears that he has finally noticed and has tired of it.

Of course, the evidence that these have been sock puppets is fairly
strong. In fact, I would suggest that it is as overwhelming as any
evidence gathered in such a way can be.

In any case, Josiah has finally taken to issuing denials.

There are lots of reasons that the denials don't wash. An example
appears in my comments from "Was Jesus Gay," reposted below:

We all know that you're a sock puppet of TurnerDiaries, just as
ExposingCondell (account suspended) was and just as ExposingCondell3
is, today. We also know about several of the others, though it would
not surprise me to hear that you have sleeper socks out there, too.
ExposingCondell3 is one.

But, just for the sake of argument, let's assume that you and
TurnerDiaries are two separate individuals and that you are being
truthful when you claim that he is part of some "confederation" of
those who seek to oppose Pat Condell.

Now, that's every bit as bizarre and obsessive as it sounds; but let's
take it for granted, for the sake of argument.

TurnerDiaries is a known advocate of Christian Identity, a hate group.
He claims that non-whites are not creations of God. He refers to non-
whites in very disparaging terms, and even frequently attacked a white
person for taking on a Spanish user name on YouTube, referring to him,
alternatively, as a mutt and a mongrel.

And those were some of the more *kind* things TurnerDiaries wrote
about this person.

You claimed that Pat referred to Christians and Islamics as "pigs" and
"dogs." I can't immediately recall that this has ever actually
happened, let alone in which videos, and we all know that you won't
say.

Apparently, it's okay for TurnerDiaries to engage in hate speech, but
when Pat does it, it's an abuse of free speech.

TurnerDiaries has also stated - several times - that those who speak
against his religion should be executed, by the state, for blasphemy.

Pat criticizes religions and the religious, though he frequently has
good words for individuals. For that, you accuse him of hate speech.

TurnerDiaries wants people to be killed for disagreeing with his
religion. He claims that non-whites are not creations of God and,
therefore, not entitled to the full benefits of a relationship with
them. He chastized, belittles, and attacks religions that differ from
his in the most strident of terms.

For that, you align yourself with him in a confederation against a
late middle-aged man who posts videos on YouTube.

Do you see the disconnect?