Thank you Praveen,
that solved my problem. After fixing the issue with the boundary id things made sense. Is there a particular reason that in 1D the boundary points are labeled in a different manner than in 2+ D?
PS. deal ii team. In the documentation on step 3 + 4 it states that the Poisson problem is solved on a domain [0,1]^dim. The actual solver however is implemented to solve this problem on the domain [-1,1]^dim. Perhaps the introduction to this tutorial should be made consistent with the commented program.
Thanks again,
Christoph
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dealii+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/C66D5394-FFCF-426E-A66F-9F3CA5A0F7B0%40gmail.com.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dea...@googlegroups.com.
Hi Peter,
I've never used this functionality of git but I think I just posted a pull-request describing this minor issue.
Wouldn't it be easier to change the documentation on the tutorials website or is that done through Git, too?
PS. My experience with Git is rather limited although I should
probably adopt a habit of using it more so maybe this is the time.
Best,
Christoph
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dealii+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/83222619-db7c-421f-bee1-3de1d485836ao%40googlegroups.com.