The EU is Fraudulent

[D. Schlenk]

https://www.europereloaded.com/the-eu-is-fraudulent/


The EU is Fraudulent


December 4, 2022

Pam Barker


https://www.europereloaded.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/EUFraudulent-min.jpg

ER Editor: Well, we’re wondering if history in relation to
Russia over at least the last 100 years has been for the
billionaires (and what we now know to be trillionaires) to
simply target it for takeover and ruin. The largest nation
state in the world, vast access to the Arctic, massive
natural resources, highly competent human resources, strong
science and technology, with a strong conservative culture.
And they look like the rest of the westerners. What’s not to
target if you’re one of a group of psychopathic ruling
families … The very same folks behind today’s global attempt
at genocide.

********
The EU is fraudulent
ERIC ZUESSE via THE DURAN

The EU is based upon — and operates under — a series of
fundamental lies.

Here is the most fundamental one: “It represents the peoples
and people of Europe.” It instead represents the
billionaires of UK and of U.S. They control the EU’s foreign
policies; and THAT is the reason why, for a nation to join
the EU, is to yield-up its sovereignty to those foreign
billionaires (mainly to American ones, since they control
far more wealth than do the ones in UK), and to become yet
another of their vassal-nations. These billionaires control
the entire Rhodesist empire.

At the end of World War II, the issue of separating Russia
from the rest of Europe was central to the U.S.-UK regime’s
plan (the Rhodesist plan). And, for the U.S. and UK, this
meant that the Rhodesists must control what George Orwell,
the author of the prophetic 1948 novel 1984, called
“Oceania” — which was an ambiguously fascist or communist
empire including the British Empire plus the Western
Hemisphere — and that they must ultimately fight for and win
control over Europe right up to the Soviet border, so that
“Eurasia” will be only the Soviet Union, and that the only
other power would be “Eastasia,” which is China, Korea and
Japan. That would have included both the core and the
periphery of Rhodes’s plan, but Orwell had a very hostile
attitude toward any type of imperialism (including
Rhodesist); and, in any case, the real-world conquests by
the real-world version of ‘Oceania’ came much sooner than
Orwell ever imagined it could. Almost immediately after 1948
— the very next year, in fact — NATO was born in 1949, and
the Rhodesists also ended up controlling not only much of
non-Soviet Europe, but also Japan, and part of Korea. So,
the Soviet Union was virtually surrounded by Rhodesist
forces.

Furthermore, immediately upon such successes, the Rhodesists
aimed to control Europe not only militarily (through their
NATO) but also diplomatically, through, ultimately, a
European Union, which became created by the CIA. The details
are supplied in an exhaustive 1,000-page biography of Jean
Monnet by Éric Roussel, which was published only in France
in 1996, and which seems to have been successfully
suppressed. It has never been translated, and has no reviews
even at America’s Amazon, and only 4 reviews at Amazon in
France. However, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard of UK’s Telegraph
newspaper has provided some of the core information from it.
Furthermore, Richard J. Aldrich’s 2003 The Hidden Hand also
provides key details, such as by Aldrich’s saying, on page
366, about the American Committee for a United Europe:

ACUE, more than any other American front organization of
the Cold War, was a direct creature of the leading lights of
the CIA. Indeed, it was so replete with famous CIA figures
that its ‘front’ was very thin. Its early years seemed to
have formed something of a laboratory for figures such as
[Bill] Donovan, [Allen] Dulles, [Walter] Bedell Smith and
[Tom] Braden, before they moved on to other projects in the
mid-1950s. Over its first three years of operations,
1949-51, ACUE received $384,650, the majority being
dispersed to Europe. This was a large sum, but from 1952
ACUE began to spend such sums annually. The total budget for
the period 1949-60 amounted to approximately $4 million. As
the quantity of money flowing across the Atlantic began to
increase, ACUE opened a local Paris office to monitor more
closely groups that had received grants. By 1956, the flood
of increased funding was prompting fears among the Directors
of ACUE that its work would be publicly exposed. …

The emerging European Economic Community (EEC) and the
growing Western intelligence community overlapped to a
considerable degree. This is underlined by the creation of
the Bilderberg Group, an informal and secretive
transatlantic council of key decision-makers
[representatives of the billionaires who controlled U.S. and
U.S.-allied international corporations]. Bilderberg was
founded by Joseph Retinger and Prince Bernhard of the
Netherlands in 1952 in response to the rise of
anti-Americanism in Europe. … Retinger secured support from
Averell Harriman, David Rockefeller and Walter Bedell Smith.
The formation of the American wing of Bilderberg was
entrusted to Eisenhower’s psychological warfare chief, C.D.
Jackson, and the funding for the first meeting, held at the
Hotel de Bilderberg in Holland in 1954, was provided by the
CIA.

Funds for these CIA operations came not only from the U.S.
Treasury but from private sources, America’s super-rich,
and, also from organized gangsters, as was revealed in the
1998 classic by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair,
Whiteout: The CIA, Drugs and the Press. This off-the-books
funding comes from narcotics kingpins throughout the world,
as protection-money, which is essential to keep them in
business. So, the EU was financially fueled from all of
these sources, and, basically, was a bribing-operation (to
end up getting the ‘right’ people into the EU’s Parliament,
etc.), in addition to be receiving funds from what might be
considered idealistic philanthropic donors (because the
dream of a united Europe had long preceded the grubby
version of it that the CIA created for Europeans).



The EU was a Cold War operation, from its very start. It
remains that to the present day.

Pritchard issued two important articles about this, the
first being his 19 September 2000 “Euro-federalists financed
by US spy chiefs”:

DECLASSIFIED American government documents show that the
US intelligence community ran a campaign in the Fifties and
Sixties to build momentum for a united Europe. It funded and
directed the European federalist movement. … One memorandum,
dated July 26, 1950, gives instructions for a campaign to
promote a fully fledged European parliament. It is signed by
Gen William J Donovan, head of the American wartime Office
of Strategic Services, precursor of the CIA.

The documents were found by Joshua Paul, a researcher at
Georgetown University in Washington. They include files
released by the US National Archives. Washington’s main tool
for shaping the European agenda was the American Committee
for a United Europe, created in 1948. The chairman was
Donovan, ostensibly a private lawyer by then.

The vice-chairman was Allen Dulles, the CIA director in
the Fifties. The board included Walter Bedell Smith, the
CIA’s first director, and a roster of ex-OSS figures and
officials who moved in and out of the CIA. The documents
show that ACUE financed the European Movement, the most
important federalist organisation in the post-war years. In
1958, for example, it provided 53.5 per cent of the
movement’s funds.

The European Youth Campaign, an arm of the European
Movement, was wholly funded and controlled by Washington.
The Belgian director, Baron Boel, received monthly payments
into a special account. When the head of the European
Movement, Polish-born Joseph Retinger, bridled at this
degree of American control and tried to raise money in
Europe, he was quickly reprimanded.

The leaders of the European Movement — Retinger, the
visionary Robert Schuman and the former Belgian prime
minister Paul-Henri Spaak — were all treated as hired hands
by their American sponsors. The US role was handled as a
covert operation. ACUE’s funding came from the Ford and
Rockefeller foundations as well as business groups with
close ties to the US government.

Then, on 27 April 2016, he bannered “The European Union
always was a CIA project, as Brexiteers discover” and
reported:

It was Washington that drove European integration in the
late 1940s, and funded it covertly under the Truman,
Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon administrations. …
The US has relied on the EU ever since as the anchor to
American regional interests alongside NATO. … It is odd that
this magisterial 1000-page study found only a
French-language publisher. [Roussel’s Jean Monnet. The
French Wikipedia’s article on Roussel says “En 1995, il
écrit une biographie consacrée à Jean Monnet2 qui reçoit le
prix de l’Essai de l’Académie française, le prix Guizot, et
le prix européen de l’histoire.” Despite all of those
awards, the work is little-known, even in France.] Nor are
many aware of declassified documents from the State
Department archives showing that US intelligence funded the
European movement secretly for decades, and worked
aggressively behind the scenes to push Britain into the
project. …

[The CIA] treated some of the EU’s ‘founding fathers’ as
hired hands, and actively prevented them finding alternative
funding that would have broken reliance on Washington. … The
American ‘deep state’ was in up to its neck. …

Since that newspaper (like all major news-media in the U.S.
and in its vassal-nations are) is both neoliberal and
neoconservative, the neoconservative Pritchard approved of
all this. He did it by saying:

“There is nothing particularly wicked about this. The US
acted astutely in the context of the Cold War. The political
reconstruction of Europe was a roaring success.”

However, obviously, no authentic democracy can exist in a
nation that’s governed by means of deceiving its public; nor
can any democracy be an empire, either the imperialistic
nation itself, or one of its vassal-nations, because that’s
merely “Deep State” rule, behind the scenes, by its
billionaires — an aristocracy, and not a democracy, which
reigns there. Though all of the country’s major news-media
will support the aristocracy — since they (like all of the
international corporations) will all be owned by the
aristocracy — anyone who calls it a ‘democracy’ is
transparently a fool or a liar, because it’s an aristocracy,
which is the exact opposite.

Near the beginning of FDR’s lengthy fireside chat to the
nation on 28 April 1942, he said:

“On the European front the most important development of
the past year has been without question the crushing
counteroffensive on the part of the great armies of Russia
against the powerful German Army. These Russian forces have
destroyed and are destroying more armed power of our enemies
— troops, planes, tanks, and guns — than all the other
United Nations put together.”

(NOTE: He was already using the phrase “United Nations” with
the objective in mind for all of the world’s nations to view
themselves as having been saved by the U.N. that FDR was
intending ultimately to replace all empires and to be the
sole source of international laws.) Near the War’s end, on
19 September 1944, even the Rhodesist Churchill telegrammed
to Stalin “that it is the Russian army that tore the guts
out of the German military machine and is at the present
moment holding by far the larger portion of the enemy on its
front.” As the History Channel’s article “Operation
Barbarossa” summed-up: “On 22 June 1941, German forces began
their invasion of the Soviet Union, … the most powerful
invasion force in history, … 80% of the German army … [plus]
30 divisions of Finnish and Romanian troops. … By the time
Germany officially surrendered to the Allies on 8 May 1945,
80% of its casualties during WW2 had come on the Eastern
Front [the Soviet Union].” Wikipedia’s “Operation
Barbarossa” said “The failure of Operation Barbarossa
reversed the fortunes of the Third Reich.” However, on 8 May
2020, U.S. President Donald Trump tweeted “On May 8, 1945,
America and Great Britain had victory over the Nazis!
America’s spirit will always win. In the end, that’s what
happens.” So goes the Rhodesist myth, but certainly not the
history.

Here is how the EU thanks Russia for that: by blaming
Russia, right along with Nazi Germany, as having been their
enemy during WW II. The U.S.-regime-created EU’s European
Parliament voted on 19 September 2019 for a resolution
condemning both Hitler and Stalin for having started World
War II, which is a lie — and an especially outrageous one,
considering that the Soviet Union did more than any other
country to defeat Hitler and to enable all of those
countries to not now be controlled by a Nazi regime.
(Shortly after that article, another article, by Max Parry,
independently came to the same conclusion: that the EU is
fascist.) This Big-Lie Resolution, which the EU’s Parliament
passed on 19 September 2019, said that

whereas it has become commonplace for Russia to deny
responsibility and blame hostilities on the West in its
official rhetoric, creating a reliable propaganda base upon
which it can rely to justify its disregard of international
law and continue its aggression against Eastern Partnership
countries; [the EU]

1. Stresses that the Second World War, the most
devastating war in Europe’s history, was caused by the
notorious Nazi-Soviet Treaty of Non-Aggression of 23 August
1939, also called the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, and its
secret protocols, which allowed two totalitarian regimes
that shared the goal of world conquest to divide Europe into
two zones of influence.

The actual history is: Stalin had been begging the UK to
ally with the Soviet Union to defeat Hitler; and, after
being snubbed each time, joined with Hitler in order to
prevent an expected invasion by Hitler against the Soviet
Union. It was an act of desperation by Stalin, which was
forced upon him by the UK. And now, the U.S. and its allies
rewrite ‘history’ to make the Soviet Union their enemy
during WW II, instead of their savior — as they actually
were.

On 3 March 2021, the ardent Rhodesist and retired former
Commander of the U.S. Army in Europe, General Ben Hodges,
addressed an online “Zoom” conference of U.S. and Ukrainian
nazis and admirers and followers of the pro-Axis WW II
Ukrainian leader Stepan Bandera (who was famous for
slaughtering Jews). Hodges said: “I was appalled, like many
of you, when President [Frank-Walter] Steinmeier, the
President of the German Federal Republic, made this comment,
like you have to understand, we’re responsible for the
deaths of millions of Russians, and there’s a history here,
… and of course it was millions of Ukrainians, not many of
the Russians, that died during the Second World War, and so
the whole narrative that comes from Berlin is
unsatisfactory, and this is where the United States has got
to put pressure on Berlin” (to stand up for the U.S. and now
also Ukrainian assertive anti-Russian position). Hodges was
telling today’s Ukrainian nazis — who have become vastly
more hostile toward Russians than toward Jews — that Hitler
slaughtered “millions of Ukrainians, not many of the
Russians.” He was especially outraged against Steinmeier,
who had previously expressed himself opposed to NATO’s
having taken up some of Hitler’s fallen banner. On 18 June
2016, the BBC had headlined “German minister warns Nato
against ‘warmongering’”, and reported that Steinmeier had
said, “What we shouldn’t do now is inflame the situation
further through sabre-rattling and warmongering. … Whoever
believes that a symbolic tank parade on the alliance’s
eastern border will bring security is mistaken.” He was an
anti-nazi German, whereas General Hodges was a pro-nazi
American. Steinmeier continued: “We are well-advised to not
create pretexts to renew an old confrontation.” He was
actually criticizing NATO for doing some of what Hitler had
been doing during the lead-up to Germany’s 1941 invasion of
the Soviet Union. Hodges was now saying that America should
ignore people such as Steinmeier and encourage yet more of
those NATO military ‘exercises’ on Russia’s borders. And, as
usually happens when a nazi cites ‘history,’ he was spouting
lies. That conference was held in conjunction with the
Atlantic Council, which is NATO’s main PR agency, and its
purpose was to encourage U.S. President Biden to take a
harder stance against Russia than he yet had done.

The U.S., in a sense, has adopted not only many ‘former’
Nazis, but the mantle of German Nazism — not (of course) as
regards Jews, but instead as regards Russia and
world-conquest in general: America is the world’s leading
aggressive and imperialist nation. The EU is an important
part of that operation, and thus now equates Russia with
Nazism instead of with having conquered the Nazis. Authentic
European democrats would therefore abandon alliances with
the imperialistic U.S., and would recognize — and honor the
fact — that Russia is an important part of Europe, and was
the main source of the victory against Nazism. Only then can
the Cold War, which Truman started, and which George Herbert
Walker Bush and his successors continue, finally end. And,
by abandoning the fascist U.S. empire, Europeans would
finally break the back of imperialism itself (the major sin
of so many European countries); and, maybe, ultimately
establish what had been FDR’s dream, of a truly meaningful
U.N.

If this requires a rewriting of ‘history’, then that is a
‘history’ which is built only on lies, and it needs to be
“re-written.” Many of these lies concern what have become
the most symbolic aspects of the ‘history’ of the Cold War,
such as the Berlin Wall and the separation between East and
West Germany. It goes back even to before the time when
Truman himself had made the decision for America to conquer
the world.

The map of Europe shows Germany being in central Europe and
Poland adjoining the northern half of Germany, which was all
of East Germany. Wikipedia’s article on “East Germany” shows
a mere dot where West Berlin was, and it is located deep in
East Germany, closer to Poland than to West Germany. This
article says that: “East Germany, officially the German
Democratic Republic … was a country that existed from 1949
to 1990, the period when the eastern portion of Germany was
part of the Eastern Bloc during the Cold War, commonly
described as a communist state in English usage. … It
consisted of territory that was administered and occupied by
Soviet forces following the end of World War II — the Soviet
occupation zone of the Potsdam Agreement, bounded on the
east by the Oder-Neisse line. The Soviet zone surrounded
West Berlin but did not include it and West Berlin remained
outside the jurisdiction of the GDR.” Wikipedia’s article
about this dot, “West Berlin”, asserts that “West Berlin was
formally controlled by the Western Allies and was entirely
surrounded by the Soviet-controlled East Berlin and East
Germany. West Berlin had great symbolic significance during
the Cold War, as it was widely considered by westerners an
‘island of freedom’. It was heavily subsidized by West
Germany as a ‘showcase of the West’.” In short: Truman, ever
since Potsdam, established West Berlin deep inside the zone
of Germany — East Germany — which had been conquered by
Stalin’s forces, and Truman did this in order to shower it
with Marshall Plan wealth in order to make East Germans envy
it, so that America would win Germany, which had actually
been conquered by the Soviet Union. This was done before
1950 and NATO and the making-public of Truman’s Cold War to
conquer ‘communism’ — actually done to conquer the Soviet
Union.

The War in the West (according to the U.S. fascists) ended
on 7 May 1945 at Reims, France when General Jodl signed a
surrender to Eisenhower’s agent (as well as to Soviet
General Ivan Susloparov and French General Francois Sevez)
in order to avoid having Germany’s soldiers face harsher
treatment by Soviet General Zhukov in Berlin, who was to
receive the final surrender on May 9th in Berlin, when
General Keitel signed, which ended the War in the east and
the entire war against Germany. Eisenhower took France
(Stalin laid no claim to it), but Zhukov didn’t take
Germany, because Stalin wanted good relations with Truman
and thought that giving Truman not only France but half of
Berlin (West Berlin) might prevent any Cold War between the
Allies. But, of course, on 25 July 1945, at Potsdam, Truman
decided to take not only France and part of Berlin, but the
entire world, for the United States. That dashed the plans
of FDR and Stalin, but fulfilled the hope of Churchill and
the dream of Rhodes. The UK-U.S. empire would rule (almost)
the entire world.

The U.S. regime’s ‘historians’ allege that 7 May 1945 was
the day on which “Germany surrenders unconditionally to the
Allies at Reims”, and that’s how it was celebrated in
U.S.-vassalized west-European nations at the time, but that
‘surrender’ was fake, actually conditional upon its
receiving Stalin’s acceptance of Germany’s surrender, and
also the acceptance by Jodl’s own boss, Grand Admiral Karl
Donitz, Hitler’s successor. Both of those acceptances came
in Berlin, where Keitel signed Germany’s surrender, actually
unconditionally, and not at Reims, where Jodl had signed it
conditionally upon Stalin’s approval, which that ‘surrender’
(to Eisenhower’s forces) never received. There was already
in Ike’s mind a hope for the Cold War that would come, and
for the global dominance of America’s billionaires. Truman
approved this scheme, even that early.

National Geographic’s “Why Germany surrendered twice in
World War II” presents the fascist propaganda about this, by
asserting: “The Russians celebrate May 9 as Victory Day to
this day. The Reims surrender wasn’t even reported in the
Soviet press until a day afterward, proof according to some
observers that the second surrender was a propaganda move
orchestrated so Stalin could claim a larger part of the
credit for ending the war.” The fascists will never abandon
their lies, the myths they pump (such as that Stalin wasn’t
the main person who defeated the Axis and especially
Germany). The very idea that Germany’s surrender would be
effectuated by a signature in France instead of in Germany —
is ludicrous. Furthermore, Admiral Dönitz knew that Stalin
was far more hostile toward Nazis than Eisenhower was, and
so Dönitz was hoping for the U.S. instead of the U.S.S.R. to
control post-War Germany (and his hope became fulfilled),
which was why Dönitz accepted Jodl’s attempted surrender in
France. Stalin did not, and this was why Truman needed to
accept Stalin’s demand that the final surrender would be in
Berlin.

Today’s Germany tries to fudge the question of precisely
where and when and how Germany had surrendered. However, the
reality is that though Stalin was willing to give West
Berlin to the other ‘allies’, they weren’t willing to give
Stalin the time of day. And the EU was born from that
Rhodesist global-supremacism, which today is called
“neoconservatism” and is shared uniformly by all of the
well-funded political Parties throughout the Rhodesist
(i.e., UK/U.S.) empire — it is ‘bipartisan’ everywhere in
the empire, regardless of what the public there want, and
the media represent that agenda.

Rhodesists run their empire of
permanent-war-for-perpetual-peace by evermore propagandizing
for ‘national defense’. This boosts the national debt, and
reduces services that the Government supplies to the public.
Billionaires love both sides of it. Thus, for example, in
1994, the Rhodesist George Soros became the controlling
donor to Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and had its
headquarters moved to Prague in 1995, so as to continue the
Cold War even after the U.S.S.R.’s end. That American
billionaire even keeps a running list of which members of
the European Parliament he controls. Some of the few people
who know that this is done don’t like it. But, of course,
only few know about it.
The evidence that the EU is a dictatorship is vast, and this
is just the surface of it. Much more can be found in the
sources that are linked-to here.

(NOTE: This article is adapted from my 2022 AMERICA’S EMPIRE
OF EVIL.)


Source:
https://www.europereloaded.com/the-eu-is-fraudulent/