Shame on DUTCH scientific community

Skip to first unread message

Feb 10, 2000, 3:00:00 AM2/10/00
The aim of my posting is to inform and advertise in order to obtain an
investigation of my allegations.
The submission of my site to known search engines ( Yahoo) is rejected
therefore I have to stick with Usenet. Seven home pages related to this
case has been
deleted (Tripod, Worldonline,DSE,fortunrcity,angelfire, etc..).
About atrocities, among them a recent assassination of a family member,
will publish them as soon as some investigations will be accomplished.

Thank you for reading my posting.

PS: if you care about scientific ethics you can forward this message to
relevant forums (maybe we can learn Philips how to make things better)
or send an e-mail to the bad guys.


This is a story about scientific misconduct in the Netherlands and 10
years ( i mean 10 years and still waiting...) of struggle for an honest
and fair investigation of allegationsof scientific misconduct . During
this time period I, and members of my family, had to endure police
harassment, justice accusations, and intimidations. Lawyers in this
land are chauvinist and the scientist protect eachother, say ,seen the
size of the country they form a warm and sympathic club. I feel that
the "dutch" has a serious problem with self-criticism notion related to
some "complexe de superiorite". You can ask yourself why they treat a
colleague in such a manner for the simple reason that he prefer acting
ethically !!!!. I dont care about a scientific career, but i 'll do in
matters concerning my human rights and integrity. Damn it, why they
perform a fraud on my samples of my own research, why this racist
administration of this miniature university TWENTE prevent any
why should family members pay with their life for it, why the dutch is
bad, and so many questions. In all these years a so called professors
(Fluitman, Wallinga, Popma) a pseudo-scientist Aite(condidat de
bonheur), a frustrated Philips scientist D.R. Wolters live without any
awareness of their wrong doing...and what about my last lawyer from the
40 evils i met... , and the hypocresie of the scientific community
world wide i contacted including the respectable organization
IEEE...Well if you are a student, a post-doc researcher, i am afraid to
inform you that humans are corrupt, and DO NEVER COMPLAIN about a
fraud, you loose !!!!
Here is the story, some details are kept secret till an investigation
take place !!!

In 1987 I worked for Philips Research Laboratories in a semiconductor
Group. My starting salary as post-doc was 1000 $ monthly. I feel that
this was intellectual abuse, for the reason that my activities were
limited to
investigations of unknown devices. (See Philips report). I got a
minimum information at the end of my stay to write down a report !!!
Scientifically speaking a report about my activities was nonsense. A
French professor, who introduced me there, got a copy of this report,
and this was the beginning of a nightmare in the Netherlands. I should
pay for this including my family members. The youngest of them were
kicked out from their schools and the adults from their jobs.
Recently they murdered a family member.

In 1988 I started another post-doc job for two years at University of
Twente to develop an integrated angle detector, and was paid 1200$
monthly. I didn't know that after a year unemployment that this was a
trick of Philips researchers. The majority of the electrical faculty at
this university were ex-Philips workers and still depend on this
Philips. During two years, I have been subjected to harassment and work
intimidatons (a computer for wordprocessing was not available, a visit
to a scientific congres was not possible, and PHILIPS succeed to
introduce a japanese dirty task manager in my working room ) . For
1200$ monthly, the university had the intention of exploiting me and
to publish my work under someone else's name.

-In May 1990, i complained to the faculty director that without my
knowledge, they treated my wafers with a NH3 plasma. My complaints were
not investigated among them work abuse complaints. The University
administration refused to investigate my case.

-In 1991 i contacted the first lawyer who claimed information about
their illegal treatment of wafers of my research and their
publications. The university refused any cooperation and the lawyer was
unable to continue the case. A Philips researcher Dr.D.R Wolters,
ex-colleague, did contact the lawyer and maybe intimidate hem.

-In 1993 and later in 1994 I discovered for the first time their
patent applications about a new method using NH3 plasma treatment of
silicon wafer (first they treated my wafers with NH3 plasma without my
knowledge, with the aim to introduce hydrogene and nitrogen in SiO2/Si
at 300C, when they realized that their method doesn't work, they treat
Silicon with HF at room.temperature, and nitridized SiO2 at higher
temperature to justify the exactitude of their patent claims) and an US-
patent about PECVD machine. I contacted the second lawyer which advised
me to come with an expert report from an independent scientist. It took
me 2 more
years to understand that I was alone in my efforts, and the scientific
community refused to assist me. A third lawyer refused to contact a
consultant to discuss the needed expert report. In all this period I
contacted scientists and scientific organizations in the Netherlands
and from many parts of the world. Even the Dutch academy of science
refused to assist me by providing an expert report about my case. A
huge number of lawyers has been contacted and they refused to help me
giving the excuse that a legal case against a university is not
possible. They didn't even mention Philips.
In 1996, a new complaint of allegations of scientific fraud by the
university was ignored.
The position of the university was that my case was investigated by my
superiors and Professor Popma. Popma was a colleague and couldn't stand
as independent investigator. Further I didn't have any technical
discussion with them about the matter. Even a national consul found
that the position of the university was right even that they
got a notification from the Dutch academy of science. In this
notification, the Dutch scientific community required investigation of
all allegations of scientific misconduct by an independent scientific
Recently I got a document were Philips had attacked me personally by
the university administration. I am now waiting for a print out of an
expert report. I contacted the expert 4 years ago, and paid him 14
months ago after his agreed to assist me.
I can justify my allegations by the fact that the university requested
a grant follow-up of my research and encouraged me to send a
publication abstract based on erroneous data. At the same time a
second ( secret and with different motivation) request for a grant
follow-up for the benefit of another guy ( a dutch native) has been
deposited and honored even that the whole project has NO scientific
The problem is that the university refused to investigate the case,
neglecting the Dutch academy of science notification about how to deal
with allegations of scientific misconduct. Further besides technical
data about a scientific fraud you find at: (in order to protect my home
page against Philips hackers, in this page you will find the URL ) some
examples of intellectual abuse and exploitation. The serious atrocities
will be published after some investigations.

Sent via
Before you buy.

Reply all
Reply to author
0 new messages