Thank you for reading my posting.
PS: if you can forward this message to relevant forums maybe we can
Philips how to make things better
This is a story about scientific misconduct in the Netherlands and 10
years of struggle for an honest and fair investigation of allegations
of scientific misconduct . During this time period I, and members of my
family, had to endure police harassment, justice accusations, and
In 1987 I worked for Philips Research Laboratories in a semiconductor
Group. My starting salary as post-doc was 1000 $ monthly. I feel that
this was intellectual abuse, for the reason that my activities were
investigations of unknown devices. (See Philips report). I got a
minimum information at the end of my stay to write down a report !!!
Scientifically speaking a report about my activities was nonsense. A
French professor, who introduced me there, got a copy of this report,
and this was the beginning of a nightmare in the Netherlands. I should
pay for this including my family members. The youngest of them were
kicked out from their schools and the adults from their jobs.
Recently they murdered a family member.
In 1988 I started another post-doc job for two years at University of
Twente to develop an integrated angle detector, and was paid 1200$
monthly. I didn't know that after a year unemployment that this was a
trick of Philips researchers. The majority of the electrical faculty at
this university were ex-Philips workers and still depend on this
Philips. During two years, I have been subjected to harassment and work
intimidatons (a computer for wordprocessing was not available, a visit
to a scientific congres was not possible, and PHILIPS succeed to
introduce a japanese dirty task manager in my working room ) . For
1200$ monthly, the university had the intention of exploiting me and
to publish my work under someone else's name.
-In May 1990, i complained to the faculty director that without my
knowledge, they treated my wafers with a NH3 plasma. My complaints were
not investigated among them work abuse complaints. The University
administration refused to investigate my case.
-In 1991 i contacted the first lawyer who claimed information about
their illegal treatment of wafers of my research and their
publications. The university refused any cooperation and the lawyer was
unable to continue the case. A Philips researcher Dr.D.R Wolters,
ex-colleague, did contact the lawyer and maybe intimidate hem.
-In 1993 and later in 1994 I discovered for the first time their
patent applications about a new method using NH3 plasma treatment of
silicon wafer (first they treated my wafers with NH3 plasma without my
knowledge, with the aim to introduce hydrogene and nitrogen in SiO2/Si
at 300C, when they realized that their method doesn't work, they treat
Silicon with HF at room.temperature, and nitridized SiO2 at higher
temperature to justify the exactitude of their patent claims) and an US-
patent about PECVD machine. I contacted the second lawyer which advised
me to come with an expert report from an independent scientist. It took
me 2 more
years to understand that I was alone in my efforts, and the scientific
community refused to assist me. A third lawyer refused to contact a
consultant to discuss the needed expert report. In all this period I
contacted scientists and scientific organizations in the Netherlands
and from many parts of the world. Even the Dutch academy of science
refused to assist me by providing an expert report about my case. A
huge number of lawyers has been contacted and they refused to help me
giving the excuse that a legal case against a university is not
possible. They didn't even mention Philips. In 1996, a new complaint of
allegations of scientific fraud by the university was ignored.
The position of the university was that my case was investigated by my
superiors and Professor Popma. Popma was a colleague and couldn't
stand as independent investigator. Further I didn't have any technical
discussion with them about the matter. Even a national consul found
that the position of the university was right even that they
got a notification from the Dutch academy of science. In this
notification, the Dutch scientific community required investigation of
all allegations of scientific misconduct by an independent scientific
Recently I got a document were Philips had attacked me personally by
the university administration. I am now waiting for a print out of an
expert report. I contacted the expert 4 years ago, and paid him 14
months ago after his agreed to assist me.
I can justify my allegations by the fact that the university requested
a grant follow-up of my research and encouraged me to send a
publication abstract based on erroneous data. The problem is that the
university refused to investigate the case, neglecting the Dutch
academy of science notification about how to deal with allegations of
scientific misconduct. Further besides technical data about a
scientific fraud you find at:
http://www.angelfire.com/ut/benyounes/ (in order to protect my home
page against Philips hackers, in this page you will find the URL ) some
examples of intellectual abuse and exploitation. The serious atrocities
will be published after some investigations.
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
> The aim of my posting is to inform and advertise in order to obtain an
> investigation of my allegations.
> The submission of my site to known search engines ( Yahoo) is rejected
> I have to stick with Usenet. Four home pages related to this case has
> (2*Tripod, Worldonline,DSE).
> About atrocities, among them a recent assassination of a family member,
> publish them as soon as some investigations will be accomplished.
> Thank you for reading my posting.
this is a joke, right??? get over it... I've had more ideas stolen under
the guise of corporate intellectual property than I can remember... the only
answer is to wise up, move on, and keep innovating... but never disclose
certain aspects of your process/procedure until after you've been
appropriately compensated... I have several patents and it works every