info
Google 網路論壇不再支援新的 Usenet 貼文或訂閱項目，但過往內容仍可供查看。
Dismiss
The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
瀏覽次數：195 次
跳到第一則未讀訊息
Happy Oyster
2017年5月17日 下午5:59:392017/5/17
收件者：
The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
http://transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=9204
[*quote*]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1
May 17, 2017, 09:58:02 PM
Welcome, Guest
News:.
Atoms deactivated. --- 0 Kelvin reached.
TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1 >
FRAUENPOWER! >
~~~ FRAUENPOWER! ~~~ >
The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
Author
worelia
Boltbender
Jr. Member
The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
« on: April 13, 2017, 10:34:39 PM »
Gulf News is not a reliable source. Gulf News cheats surfers. Gulf News
freezes browsers. Gulf News must stop their criminal "attitudes".
This case of science fraud is much too important to keep it secret. Why?
Because it is not the first one and it will not be the last one. Because
it is based on religion.
For the free internet, this is what professor Nidhal Guessoum wrote:
[*quote*]
Gulf News
PhD thesis: The earth is flat
in agreement61%
The Arab world will continue to suffer educational and cultural crises
until it properly digests the different methodologies of science and
religion
By Nidhal Guessoum, Special to Gulf News
19:36 April 10, 2017
Last week, a huge scandal rocked the Tunisian and Arab scientific and
educational world: a PhD student submitted a thesis declaring Earth to
be flat, unmoving, young (only 13,500 years of age), and the centre of
the universe.
Going even bolder and further, the student explicitly rejected the
physics of Newton and Einstein, the astronomy of Copernicus and Kepler,
the cosmology of the Big Bang, the main models of atmospheric and
geological activity, and most of modern climatology.
The student submitted her thesis after five years of work; it was then
sent to two assessors, thus passing the first stage of approvals. The
reports were expected soon, for the thesis defence to be scheduled.
It was at this stage that fate luckily intervened: a copy of the thesis
was “leaked” to the former president of the Tunisian Astronomical
Association, who checked that it was not a hoax and then quickly rang
the alarm by posting on Facebook the general conclusions of the thesis,
verbatim.
Gulf News readers may recall that two years ago, I wrote a column
lamenting the talk that a Saudi cleric had given in the UAE insisting
that Earth does not rotate, neither around itself nor around the Sun; I
described the moment as a “debacle” and tried to draw lessons from it.
This new scandal is much worse, because it does not come from a cleric
(that was bad enough) but rather from a PhD student in science, her
supervisor held the Professor rank (the highest in academia), and they
were explicitly rejecting major parts of modern science.
They also went further than just submit a thesis, they published a paper
(in an obscure and disreputable journal) presenting “physical and
astronomical arguments” for geo-centrism (Earth being central and fixed
in the universe).
The paper is available online, and anyone can quickly check that both
the paper and the journal are worthless: countless grammatical errors,
mediocre references, puny scientific arguments; the journal is
classified as “fake and predatory”, one of those “pay and we’ll publish
your article quickly, with no reviewing or editing”...
I don’t mean to belabour the point, but it is worth citing a few ideas
from the general conclusion given at the end of the thesis, if at least
to fully impress upon the reader the size of the calamity that has just
occurred — before we analyse its causes.
The “results” of this doctoral thesis include: the Earth is flat and
young, and it stands immobile at the centre of the universe, which is
made of only one galaxy; the sun’s diameter is 1,135km (not 1.4 million
km), the moon is 908 km wide, and they lie 687 and 23 times closer to
Earth, respectively; there are 11 planets; stars are “limited” in number
and have a diameter of 292 km (not millions of km).
How does one explain such stunning ignorance of basic astronomy, coupled
with such brashness and insolence — rejecting Copernicus, Kepler,
Newton, Einstein, Hubble, and everything in science?
In this particular case, I believe this was due to an adherence to
religious, scriptural literalism, in other words taking the meanings of
religious texts literally and blindly, at the cost of rejecting all
knowledge that appears to contradict it, no matter how much evidence
supports it.
Indeed, we find in the conclusions of the thesis clear indications of
this stand and approach, expressions such as: “using physical and
religious arguments”, “also proving the world scale of [Noah’s] flood”,
“proposed a new kinematic approach that conforms to the verses of the
Quran”, “the roles of the stars are: (1) to be ornaments of the sky; (2)
to stone the devils; and (3) as signs to guide creatures in the darkness
of earth”; and finally “the geo-centric model... accords with the verses
of the Quran and the pronouncements of our Prophet.”
Comeback
Flat-Earthism has lately been making a comeback and spreading like bush
fire through social media.
Search for “flat earth” on YouTube and you’ll find almost a million
videos; “flat earth society” gets 400,000 pages on the web; “flat earth
proof” gets you 200,000 pages; etc.
But this social media trend I attribute to people’s inclination toward
conspiracy theories: “Nasa has faked the moon-landing”; “Nasa photoshops
space images”; “Give us real proofs that these interplanetary spacecraft
are factual”; etc.
In 2001, when the internet was still young, and the “moon-landing hoax”
was just emerging as a trending meme (without social media to support
its spread), I gave several talks titled “Did Nasa fake the moon
landing... or are we miserably failing to educate the public?”
But the latest shocking event (the PhD thesis) implies that we are not
only failing to educate the public (that is manifest in the trendy “flat
earth” and “Nasa lies” memes on social media) but also our brightest
students.
It has been reported that the PhD student had previously graduated at
the top of her class.
What we are failing to clarify and communicate is how to distinguish
between scientific knowledge (facts, models, theories, etc.) and
religious knowledge (what verses mean and what they intend to teach us).
I believe the Arab-Muslim world will continue to suffer educational and
cultural crises, not to mention a total lack of understanding of
science, until it properly digests the different methodologies of
science and religion, without diminishing the value of each.
Nidhal Guessoum is a professor of physics and astronomy at the American
University of Sharjah. You can follow him on Twitter at:
www.twitter.com/@NidhalGuessoum.
[*/quote*]
Logged
worelia
Boltbender
Jr. Member
Posts: 316
Kharroubi Amira: The earth is the center of the universe! And it is
flat!
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2017, 10:53:29 PM »
Why does Nidhal Guessoum not give any names? It does not take much to
find Kharroubi Amira as the infamous PhD student and Touir Jamel as
being the professor involved.
The quotes Nidhal Guessoum cites in his article, where are they in the
original???
This is the relatively short text of the "thesis":
http://www.theijst.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/9.-ST1608-011.pdf
As the original pdf file is gone, interested readers can find a copy
with the web archive:
http://web.archive.org/web/20160925142646/http://www.theijst.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/9.-ST1608-011.pdf
[*quote*]
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLEDGE
The Geocentric Model of the Earth: Physics and Astronomy Arguments
Kharroubi Amira
Ph.D. Student, Department of Geography, National Engineering School of
Sfax, Sfax University,
Laboratory Water, Energy, Environment (L3E), Sfax, Tunisia
Touir Jamel
Lecturer, Department of Geography, Faculty of Sciences of Sfax, Sfax
University,
Laboratory Water, Energy, Environment (L3E), Sfax, Tunisia
Abstract:
Several astronomical observations have shown the presence of numerous
failings in heliocentric model such as Mercury
retrograde motion, cosmic rays and Perseids meteors. Numerous
researchers are talking about these topics. Because there
is no empirical evidence that the Earth actually orbits the sun,
astronomy observations/ geophysics arguments provide
proofs for the steady Earth and the Sun’s motion. The main contention of
the paper is to demonstrate the flaws in gravity and
relativity, and to disprove the alleged motions of the earth that for so
long time has been unjustifiably taught.
Keywords: Earth, Sun, revolution, physics, retrograde motion, solar
system
1. Introduction
Understanding cosmos occupies an extremely significant position in
scientific researches. Since antiquity, the Earth is considered stable
without any motion and it is the center of this universe (geocentric
model). However, Nicolas Copernic, Kepler and Galileo findings show,
that the Earth is not stationary (heliocentric model) and that it has
nine motions. This heliocentric model, which leans in illusion, takes
the example of a ship state leaving the port. In this case, the ship
appears stationary (in reality it is in motion) and the port (fixed on
reality) move from his initial position. Then, starting with a
hypothesis, we try to explain an observation by insisting on the theory
accuracy. This led to suggest illogical theory which becomes a reality,
forgetting that it is an assumption. Since the inception of this
mathematical theory, it has confronted several problems leading to
propose new hypotheses to justify its validity.
First, there has been an explanation of the four seasons’ alternation by
the assumption of an annual Earth spinning around the Sun in an elliptic
orbit. Second, there has been an explanation of the planet’s motion
around the Sun by suggesting the existence of gravitational force
between different planets. Third, the justification of night/ day
alternation has been proposed by suggesting the Earth daily revolution
around its imaginary axis. In addition, the temperature change is
explained during the four seasons via the postulation of 23.5 °
inclination of the Earth rotation axis to its orbit around the Sun.
Also, the assumption of a huge distance between Earth / Sun unites the
mathematical theory and physical knowledge. Furthermore, sunspots are
justified by suggesting that the Sun rotates around itself. Moreover,
the Moon rotation is supposed monthly, not daily, around the Earth from
west to east (contradict with observation). And suggesting that there
was fixed stars’ motion: according to Einstein the entire universe is in
permanent motion.
For some years, scientific researches have evolved towards a more
coherent understanding of nature and universes. So, several physicists
and astronomers have demonstrated the presence of several flaws in
earlier theories.
[1-5] refute the works and the methodology (inductive arguments) of
Newton for the reason that is a “chimera” not related to any
observation. According to [6-12], they show the presence of numerous
gaps in Newton and Einstein laws “Relativityis fundamentally wrong...”
[6].
Hence, the heliocentric theory, and all related theories, based only on
theoretical proposals have never been argued by terrestrial observations
of the sky or through satellite images or Moon [13] said: “However, if
we stay and observe it for a few hours, it will not change its position
in the sky. This is strange behavior, since here on the Earth we are
used to seeing the Moon moving across the sky from east to west”). Thus,
all the complex calculations and “imaginary” assumptions, which are not
related to any veracity, are only solutions to the problems faced by
this theory. The purpose of this paper is to prove through a variety of
arguments, taking into account all the previous flaws of the
heliocentric model, the stationarity of the Earth in the universe and
the Sun spinning around it.
2. Methods
Falsifiability of hypothesis or theory is an intrinsic possibility to
prove it to be false. In order to prove Earth stationarity in the cosmos
and Sun’s motion, aside bibliographic data, a profound review of two
complementary fields is used. On the one hand, we have used physical/
geophysical arguments (hydrodynamic laws, atmospheric characteristics,
mass-energy equivalence formula, neutrinos speed, gravity formula,
objects kinematics). On the other, we have employed self-observations
(daily surveillance of the Moon positions,
57
Vol 4 Issue 8
August, 2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
www.theijst.com
daily observation of the sun/Moon shifting, surveillance of the shadow
direction, surveillance of sunrise time at the equinox,
observation of the star’s position, laboratory experiment).
3. Result and Discussion
3.1. Bibliographic Data
First, Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887 [14] shows the stationarity
of the Earth. A light ray is split into two perpendicular component
paths, A and B have an equal length. Path A is in the direction of Earth
motion and path B at a right angle to A.expected that, due to Earth
motion, the time to travel path A would be less than the time to travel
path B, but no such interferencenoted. The two light beams arrived at
the same time proving then the Earth stationarity.
Second, [15-16]show the existence of particles traveling faster than the
light speed. When he experienced his system of wireless transmission of
energy, [15] transmitted longitudinal electric waves through the
interior of the Earth, which propagate at a speed oftimes the light
speed. Based on satellite data from Pioneer 10 and 11 [16] shows the
existence of an “anomalous” Doppler shift inradio signals received from
these satellites. The Iraqi nuclear physicist [17-18] demonstrated that
energy isn’t related to the masshe proposed a new mass-energy
equivalence formula (E= m*b*c, where b is a new derived universal
constant in term of speedand equal 0.2014 of light speed). The works of
[19-23] in the quantum cosmology show the existence of a faster than
light speeds.
Physicists at the CERN laboratory, [24-27] prove the existence of
superluminal particles called neutrinos travel faster than thespeed. The
mass-energy equivalence formula (E=mc2) is defined when “c” is constant
and it is the maximum speed ofFurthermore, when “c” is a constant,
energy must be proportional to the mass, but in the case of neutrinos,
we are in the opposite condition. The neutrino mass equal 0.06 electron
volts (eV), which is far less than a billionth of the mass of a proton
(1.67262E-270,938273 GeV) = 1,06959E-37kg and energy = 10 6 GeV)
[28-34]. As shown above, “c” is variable, mass is not related to
energy,formula must be revised. Since the general relativity formula,
physically unproven and incompatible with quantum mechanics, isthere are
not any justifications for the Earth spinning.
Third, NAZA scientific findings shows that Sun has a revolution not
around Earth but around the Lactic Way Galaxy and it has aapex (the
velocity of the Sun's orbit around the galaxy is about 220 km/s and thus
its orbital period is about 240 million yearsThis apex is an imaginary
point in the Hercules constellation, near the bright star Vega (the
speed of the Sun = 20km/s). Accordingthis fact, heliocentric model (Sun
is fixed in solar system) is rejected.
As well known, all planets have a retrograde motion. If the Sun has an
attraction force on planets to make them spinning, we never perceive
this motion kind. According to the heliocentric model, planets motions
have constantly a counterclockwise direction around Sun exempt Venus and
Uranus (clockwise direction) [36]. The observation of this retrograde
motion and the rotation direction leadsuspect the entire heliocentric
theory.
Also, depending on the planets arrangement in the solar system, Mercury
is at a distance of 58 million km (0.39 AU) from the SunPluto in 6000
million km (39 AU). Since the Sun’s attraction force reaches Pluto, and
in order to make it spinning, the Mercury rotation cannot be held
regarding the magnitude of the gravitational influence. At such
condition, the planet Mercury should haveswallowed by the Sun.
It is
is
1.6
the
and
units
light
light.
kg=
this
false,
solar
[35].
to
us
and
been
3.2. Sun / Moon Observations
A daily observation of the Moon for a lunar month shows the existence of
different rising positions. Currently, the crescents progress during
each lunar month is explained by the Moon monthly revolution around
Earth. But, this is unacceptable because we see every night Moon during
the first half of lunar month rising from its appearance point and
continuing revolution to the West until disappearance under the West
horizon. During the 14th night, the Moon goes across the sky from the
extreme East to the extreme West. During the first and the second half
of lunar month, the Moon rises from West and East respectively, but its
propagation direction is always from East to West. This is clearly
visible during the first and the second half of lunar month for the
earliest and the latest half of night correspondingly. If the Moon
follows the Earth rotation from West to East, we no longer observe these
rising positions during the lunar month. The record of the Moon
position, daily at the sunset, during a lunar month allows drawing its
analemma. Indeed, thus obtained analemma shape shows the “eight number”
providing then the Moon kinematic. Such configuration reflects the Moon
intertropical journey. If the Moon completes a single revolution around
the earth monthly (heliocentric model) the analemma must be elliptical.
Then, regarding the analemma shape and observations, the Moon revolves
around the earth daily. The diversity of the rising positions is
explicated then by the following cycle:
The Moon starts its journey from the equator ? goes to the Capricorn
tropic ? go back to the equator (14th day) ? goes to the
Cancer tropic ? come back to the equator for a new cycle.
A direct observed phenomenon allows proving the earth stationarity. This
one consists to register the position of the moon and the sun, in the
sky, during a lunar month after an eclipse event (when sun, moon and
earth are aligned). Let us take the case of the heliocentric model. If
the Sun is fixed at a distance of 150M km from the earth, the moon has a
backward motion with a slow velocity at 340000 km and the Earth have a
forward move with a more important speed than the moon. With time
progress, the angle a between the line of the earth/sun and the
earth/moon increase rapidly contrasting with observation. For the
geocentric model where the earth is steady, the sun, and the moon have a
forward motion. Sun speed is lightly fast then the moon and the distance
between celestial bodies is more convincing. With time progress, the
angle a between the line of earth/sun and earth/moon increase regularly
(the shifting angle is 11,9° daily) in agreement with sky surveillance
(Fig.1). During the first half of the lunar month, the moon position in
the sky is behind the sun and distance between them begin tiny then it
increases progressively until the fourteen day of the month where it
gets
58
Vol 4 Issue 8
August, 2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com
at the maximum (the sun at the extreme west and the moon at the extreme
east). During the second half of the month, the moon position in the sky
is in front of the sun and angle between them decrease regularly until
the sun reach the moon at the twenty-eighth day. At the new crescent
this cycle starts again.
Figure 1: Position of sun and moon in the sky
Another observation allows suspecting the heliocentric model. In the
same meridian, time is identical especially at the equinoxthe Sun
position is on equator: The Sun rises typically from south to north of
the meridian at an equal time. If the Earth axis23.5° tilt to the orbit,
in the same meridian, Sunrise must have an important time difference
(Fig. 2). This time difference presents23.5°. Then, according to the
Earth tilt, longitude line passes from the two poles form 23.5° to the
equinox Sunrise line. Subsequently, the last one must pass through the
extremity East and West of polar circle at north and south hemisphere
respectively. This situationnever observed. Therefore, if we suppose a
perpendicular position of Earth to the Sun at the equinox, Sunrise time
will be identicalthe same meridian. Since the Sunrise time at the
equinox is identical for the countries located in the same meridian,
23.5° inclination of the Earth axis is rejected.
when
has a
a
is
on
Figure 2: Variation of Sunrise line if Earth has a 23.5° inclination
axis
For insurance, the surveillance of shadow direction as seen in figure
(3) shows its relationship with the Sun position as following:
• The Sun revolves around Earth (Earth is fixed); the object shadow
direction shows a corresponding with the direction of solar
rays (Fig. 3, S1): this case is observed.
• If we check the heliocentric model (experienced in the laboratory),
the object shadow direction formed a diverse angle with
the solar rays (Fig. 3, S2): this case is never observed.
The observations of shadow direction show that Sun revolves around
Earth.
59
Vol 4 Issue 8
August, 2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com
Figure 3: Variation of shadow direction
3.3. Critic of the Earth Characteristic in the Theoretical Orbit
First, in climatology, if the Earth is nearer to the Sun about 1° this
causes its burn and if it moves away the Sun about 1° this causes
glaciations of all the Earth. The imaginative orbit of the Earth around
the Sun, along the year, is elliptic (different diameters) (Fig.This
assumption means that the Earth revolves around Sun with different
distances, but nothing is observed (not total burnglaciations during the
year). This fact explains that the “imaginative” orbit does not exist
and that Earth is fixed in the space without any motion.4).
or
Figure 4: Variation of the distance Earth/Sun in the elliptic orbit
Second, Earth has a volume, a weight and a revolution speeds
(theoretical). In the motion dynamic, objects speeds are related to its
weight. If the Earth has its different motions, the falling of the
thousands of asteroids and meteors on the Earth every day must influence
the motions velocities. These objects cause the decreasing of the speed
and everything will be attached to the Earth surface, the duration of
night/day will be longer. But nothing is observed and every day the
numbers of meteors increase without any changes.
In addition, in the heliocentric model, seasons result from 23.5 °
inclination of the Earth rotation axis to its elliptic orbit around the
Sun. But, the defect of this model is the position of winter and summer
in the orbit. Winter appears when Earth is in perihelion (closer
position to the Sun); the temperature decrease is attributed to the
Earth speed which become faster (34.145km/s) than the average speed
(29.829km/s). Summer appear when Earth is in aphelion; the temperature
increase is attributed to the Earth speed which is slower (28.851km/s)
than the average speed. Theoretically, this supposes the presence of
self-power for the Earth to enhance or reduce its velocity. This
suggestion has no argument to admit. Then, this conflict allows the
suspicion of the heliocentric model validity.
Furthermore, if the earth revolves around the sun we must observe a
clear parallax of the Sirius star, its size must be larger when the
earth is closer. If we take the position of the earth in its orbit
around the sun during the autumn equinox, after six months it will be in
the opposite position (spring equinox) at a distance equal to 299
Million kilometers. Thus, an observer on Earth should observe places in
the remote universe of 299 million km from its initial position.
Subsequently, he must observe this star in larger dimensions and a
different angle. Such situation never detected demonstrates the
stability of the earth and refutes the heliocentrism theory.
The calculation of gravitational force between Sun /Moon and Earth/Moon
shows that this interaction is more important between Sun/Moon. Since,
Sun/Moon attraction (4,38082E+20 N.m2/kg2) is higher than Earth/Moon
(1,98E+20 N.m2/kg2), the Moon cannot spin around the earth and we never
observe its evolution steps. This situation interferes with the
observation.
60
Vol 4 Issue 8
August, 2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com
For more elucidate, the polar star is a stationary since it indicates
the geographic north for peoples in Earth. The observations of skynight
in different times (for example, an hourly basis) show the same position
of this star without any motion contrasting withother stars. Such fact
proves that Earth is steady.
Also, if the Earth spins around the Sun in 365 days, its velocity must
be 108.000 Km/h, this value is 84 higher than the atmospheric sonic
speed (1200 Km/h). Taking into account the atmosphere characteristics, a
direct consequence of this velocity is to perceivehuge sound (sonic
boom) caused by this motion. But these sound never heard only if
supersonic plane across the sky. This situation could be interpreted by
assuming that the atmospheric layer acts as an insulating body. This
hypothesis cannot be admitting sincelisten to various types of sounds.
As consequence, the inexistence of sonic boom testifies the stationarity
of the earth.
3.4. The Objects Kinematic
First, if the Earth has an attraction force that is capable to hold and
attach the atmosphere during its rotation around itself, the Sunthe
other motions, we cannot detect the wind. Nevertheless, observations
show the presence of various categories of wind fromair up to gale wind
(the speed can overstep 50 knots). This fact confirms the absence of
Earth attraction.
Second, coastal dynamics researchers show that direction and wave height
are closely attached to the wind. If Earth spins aroundwith a speed of
1670 km / h we must find a single direction of the wave propagation
which will be necessarily East (dominates direction and speed). But
oceanographers have shown different wave propagation directions. The
presence of a numerous directionswave’s propagation, when the Earth is
rotating, assumes a higher carrying wind speed. This assumption is not
convincingextravagant wind speed of 1670km / h (910 mile/h) destroys any
sort of life on Earth rapidly. Regarding the Beaufort scale, the impact
of a wind speed exceeding 70 mile/h on sea/ continental state causes
catastrophic damage in the infrastructure and trees.comparison of speeds
we cannot admit any motion for the earth.
Third, the presence of balancing rocks and stacking stones in lakes and
rivers in numerous countries for several times is a powerful tool to
reveal the earth stationarity. If the Earth rotated around itself, the
Sun, the galaxy, the apex and for the universe expansions, these rocks
would move in any direction. But, the immovability of these rocks for a
long time shows the validity of the geocentric theory.
In the hydrology science, water is maintained stable in lakes / rivers
if there are not any atmospheric perturbations. The observationenormous
water bodies stable conflict with the Earth motions. This reality
reveals that Earth is steady.
The kinematic of the space rockets collide with the earth supposed
dynamic. If we assume that the Earth makes different motionsthe same
time, it means it must travel far from the point of the rocket launch.
Then, when the mission is accomplished it cannotthe position of the
Earth which would be further away. In addition, the maximum speed of a
rocket is 28000 km / h but the Earth’s speeds are much more important
(108000 km/h, 220km/s). Since the speeds of the Earth are greater than
the rockets one, theynever return to Earth. But, observations show that
the rockets return quickly and easily to the Earth. Moreover, the
satelliteslocated at a fixed distance from the Earth, if they move a
meter we cannot pick up any signal (for example: satellite dish are
placeda well determined direction, GPS). Then, the obtaining of these TV
channels diversity and the positioning at any times interferethe Earth
dynamics (revolves around itself (1670km/h), around the Sun (108000km /
h), around the galaxy (220km/s) and forexpansion of the universe).
Assuming the earth motions, these satellites must change their velocity
permanently, to conservepositions to the Earth. But, satellites don’t
have a self-power allowing them to enhance or reduce their speed. Such
result, testifiesearth stability.
Moreover, if the Earth has it different speeds motions, we cannot obtain
a high detection pictures from geostationary satellites orthe Moon. In
fact, at such high speeds, the taken pictures must be blurry. The
observation of diver’s high detected earth images conflict with these
motions.
Finally, on any clear night, a shooting star can be seen in the sky
about every ten minutes (for example the Perseids meteors observed
between 11 August and 13 August 2014). It is commonly observed that many
more meteors are seen in the early morning hours, between midnight and
sunrise; then, they are seen in the evening between Sunset and midnight.
If the Earth has different motions,cannot observe these meteors and
cosmic rays every day bombarding the Earth’s surface. This situation
could be explained byexistence of the Earth in the same position in the
cosmos.
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, various physics arguments and astronomy observations show
the stability of the Earth in the universe and the sun,moon, the stars
and the planets motion around it. Then the heliocentric model must to be
rejected. On the contrary, the revision ofgeocentric model will be
necessary. Consequently, the Sun revolves around Earth daily in 23h
56min 4.1Second from East to West.
5. References
i. Popper Karl Raimund (2002), The Logic of Scientific Discovery.
Psychology Press, 513 page
ii. Duhem Pierre Maurice Marie (1962), The Aim and Structure of
Physical. Theory Book published by Princeton University
Press, 351pages.
iii. Davies (2003), The Newtonian Myth. Studies in History and
Philosophy of Sciences, 34, 763–780
iv. Khiari (2011), Newton’s laws of motion revisited: some
epistemological and didactic problems. Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ.,5, No. 1,
v. Maxwell Nicholas (2014), Three Criticisms of Newton’s Inductive
Argument in the Principia. Advances in Historical
Studies. Vol.3 , No.1, 2-11,
61
Vol 4 Issue 8
August,at
the
a
we
and
light
itself
of
since
By
of
at
find
can
are
in
with
the
its
the
from
we
the
the
the
Vol.
2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com
vi.vii.viii.ix.x.xi.xii.xiii.xiv.xv.xvi.xvii.xviii.xix.xx.xxi.xxii.xxiii.xxiv.xxv.xxvi.xxvii.xxviii.xxix.xxx.xxxi.xxxii.xxxiii.xxxiv.xxxv.xxxvi.Escultura
(2003), The flux theory of gravitation XVII. The new mathematics and
physics. Applied MathematicsComputation 138 , - 127–149,
Scharma (2006), Einstein derived Erest = Mrest c2 from a NON-EXISTENT
equation: A Discussion. The general Science
Journal
Afriat Alexender and Ermenegildo Caccese (2010), The relativity of
inertia and reality of nothing. Studies in HistoryPhilosophy of Modern
Physics 41, 9 –26,
Kochetkov (2013), Confirmation of results of the experiments of
Michelson without the postulate about the invariance ofspeed of light.
Millennium relativity, The general Science journal
Mathis (2013), The greatest standing errors in physics and mathematics.
Book (http://milesmathis.com/index.html).
Chun-Xuan Jiang(2014), The discovery of primordial gravitational waves
is 100% wrong. The general Science Journal
Lehmkurl Dennis (2014), Why Einstein did not believe that general
relativity geometrizes gravity. Studies in HistoryPhilosophy of Modern
physics, Vol 46, Part B, Pages 316–326, (2014).
Jayant V. Narlicar (1999), Seven Wonders of the Cosmos. Cambridge
University Press, 15 avr , 324 pages.
Michelson Albert and Edward Morley (1887), On the relative motion of the
earth and the aluminiferous ether. American
journal of science, Volume XXXIV, No 203 (1887),
Tesla Nicolas (1905), Art of transmitting electrical energy through the
natural medium. United States Patent Office, Serial
No. 113,034,
Lammertink Arend (2013), Electrical Engineer disproves Einsteins
Relativity Theory: The Ruins of 106 Years Relativity.
Tuks Unsorted KieknWat TWordt Stuff
Bahjat R. J. Muhyedeen (2009), New Concept of Mass-Energy Equivalence.
European Journal of Scientific Research,
Vol.26No.2, pp.161-175,
Bahjat R. J. Muhyedeen (2013), Nuclear Magneton Theory of Mass
Quantization "Unified Field Theory". European Journal
of Scientific Research, Vol. 100, No 1, pp.66-140,
Carlip S (2000), Aberration and the speed of gravity. Physics Letters A,
267, 81–87,
Galperin (2008), Information transmittal and time uncertainty, measuring
the speed of light and time of reflection,
representations of Newton’s second law and related problems. Computers
and Mathematics with Applications, 56, 1271–
1290,
Pedram and Jalalzadeh (2008), Quantum cosmology with varying speed of
light: Canonical approach. Physics Letters B,1–6,
Brax (2012), Lorentz invariance violation in modified gravity. Physics
Letters B, 712, 155–160,
Pfeifer and Wohlfarth (2012), Beyond the speed of light on Finsler
spacetimes. Physics Letters B, 712, 284–288,
Bouchard (2012), Finite Theory of the Universe, Dark Matter Disproof and
Faster-Than-Light Speed. Physics Procedia,222-241,
Katz U.F. and Spiering Ch. 704 (2012), High-energy neutrino
astrophysics: Status and perspectives. Progress in ParticleNuclear
Physics, 67, 651-,
Bertolucci Sergio (2013), Neutrino speed: a report on the speed
measurements of the BOREXINO, ICARUS andexperiments with the CNGS beam.
Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.), 235–236, 289–295,
Chun-Xuan Jiang (2014), An equation that changed the universe: F =-
mc2/R. The general Science Journal,
Ishihara Aya (2013), Ultra-high energy neutrinos with IceCube. Nuclear
Physics B (Proc. Suppl.), 235–236, 352–357,
Zhou Lingli and Bo-Qiang Ma (2013), Neutrino speed anomaly as signal of
Lorentz violation. Astroparticle Physics, 44,27,
Hernandez-Rey Juan José (2013), High energy neutrino telescopes in the
Northern Hemisphere. Nuclear InstrumentsMethods in Physics Research A,
725, 7 –12,
Zhehui Wang, Christopher L. Morris (2013), Tracking fast neutrons.
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research
A, 726, 145 –15 4,
Abe et al (2014), Observation of Electron Neutrino Appearance in a Muon
Neutrino Beam. Physical review letters, PRL061802,
Foley James A (2014), Mass of Neutrinos Accurately Calculated for First
Time, Physicists Report. Nature World News.
(available in www.natureworldnews.com/articles/ 5968/
20140210/mass-neutrinos-accurately-calculated-first-time-
physicists-report.htm)
Shigeru Yoshida (2014), Ultra-high-energy cosmic neutrinos: at 1015eV
energies and above. Comptes Rendus Physique,
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 309–317,
Paul R. Weissman (2007), Encyclopedia of the Solar System, Second
Edition , Chapter 1 - The Solar System and Its Placethe Galaxy, Pages
1-28.
Véronique Dehant, Tim Van Hoolst (2014), Encyclopedia of the Solar
System, Third Edition, Chapter 8 - RotationPlanets, Pages 159-184.
62
Vol 4 Issue 8
August,and
and
the
and
660,
38,
and
LVD
24–
and
112,
in
of
2016
[*/quote*]
« Last Edit: April 13, 2017, 11:12:18 PM by worelia »
Logged
worelia
Boltbender
Jr. Member
Posts: 316
The big cover-up
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2017, 11:39:28 PM »
The mysterious disappearance leads to the question how real the whole
appearance was. And, yes, it was real!
http://web.archive.org/web/20160923190529/http://www.theijst.com/2016-2/august-16
[*quote*]
15 The Geocentric Model of the Earth: Physics and Astronomy Arguments
Kharroubi Amira & Touir Jamel
[View] [Download PDF]
22 9
[*/quote*]
Between numbers 14 and 16 is number 15:
[*quote*]
14
Employee Development Strategies and Employees’ Commitment among Academic
Staff of Universities in Ekiti State, Nigeria
Adelugba Bisola Iyabo, Ajayi Omobola M., Ogunkolade S. O., Enitilo
Olalekan & Gbadebo A.
[View] [Download PDF]
17 9
15
The Geocentric Model of the Earth: Physics and Astronomy Arguments
Kharroubi Amira & Touir Jamel
[View] [Download PDF]
22 9
16
Climate Change Effects on Rainfall Patterns and It’ S Implications on
Sorghum and Millet Production in Kenya: A Review
A. Egesa Ogolla, N. Njau, P. Mwirigi, C. Muui W., N. Korir Kibet & M.
Mwangi
[View] [Download PDF]
31 25
[*/quote*]
Today there is a vacuum...
http://www.theijst.com/2016-2/august-16
[*quote*]
14
Study of Thunderstorms over a Madhya Pradesh Region, India
Shweta Thakur, Rahul Shrivastava & Varsha Kachneriya
[View] [Download PDF]
118 65
15
Employee Development Strategies and Employees’ Commitment among Academic
Staff of Universities in Ekiti State, Nigeria
Adelugba Bisola Iyabo, Ajayi Omobola M., Ogunkolade S. O., Enitilo
Olalekan & Gbadebo A.
[View] [Download PDF]
146 70
16
Climate Change Effects on Rainfall Patterns and It’ S Implications on
Sorghum and Millet Production in Kenya: A Review
A. Egesa Ogolla, N. Njau, P. Mwirigi, C. Muui W., N. Korir Kibet & M.
Mwangi
[View] [Download PDF]
212 207
[*/quote*]
Weird. The list was rearranged, and the article did not only vanish, no,
it was replaced. There were 22 articles, and after the disappearance
there still are 22 articles...
Logged
Krant
Jr. Member
Posts: 156
Re: The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2017, 05:21:20 PM »
In der Schule lernt man, daß die Griechen vor 2000 Jahren den
Durchmesser der Erdkugel berechnet haben. Wie konnte die Menschheit
seitdem nur so verblöden?
Logged
SolianKant
Newbie
Posts: 2
Re: The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2017, 06:37:45 PM »
Gue Frage.
Logged
RubyCat
Jr. Member
Posts: 223
Re: The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2017, 02:10:58 PM »
Ama sagt, das sei ein Wolf-Mangelsyndrom. Mehr Wölfe in den Städten und
die Evolution kommt wieder auf Kurs.
Ich würde ja noch ein paar Tiger spendieren. Mindestens...
Logged
Print
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/quote*]
--
Homöopathie ist nichts als Hütchenspielerbetrug und organisierte Kriminalität
http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/565.htm http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/570.htm
http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/585.htm http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/643.htm
http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/647.htm
http://transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=9204
[*quote*]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1
May 17, 2017, 09:58:02 PM
Welcome, Guest
News:.
Atoms deactivated. --- 0 Kelvin reached.
TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1 >
FRAUENPOWER! >
~~~ FRAUENPOWER! ~~~ >
The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
Author
worelia
Boltbender
Jr. Member
The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
« on: April 13, 2017, 10:34:39 PM »
Gulf News is not a reliable source. Gulf News cheats surfers. Gulf News
freezes browsers. Gulf News must stop their criminal "attitudes".
This case of science fraud is much too important to keep it secret. Why?
Because it is not the first one and it will not be the last one. Because
it is based on religion.
For the free internet, this is what professor Nidhal Guessoum wrote:
[*quote*]
Gulf News
PhD thesis: The earth is flat
in agreement61%
The Arab world will continue to suffer educational and cultural crises
until it properly digests the different methodologies of science and
religion
By Nidhal Guessoum, Special to Gulf News
19:36 April 10, 2017
Last week, a huge scandal rocked the Tunisian and Arab scientific and
educational world: a PhD student submitted a thesis declaring Earth to
be flat, unmoving, young (only 13,500 years of age), and the centre of
the universe.
Going even bolder and further, the student explicitly rejected the
physics of Newton and Einstein, the astronomy of Copernicus and Kepler,
the cosmology of the Big Bang, the main models of atmospheric and
geological activity, and most of modern climatology.
The student submitted her thesis after five years of work; it was then
sent to two assessors, thus passing the first stage of approvals. The
reports were expected soon, for the thesis defence to be scheduled.
It was at this stage that fate luckily intervened: a copy of the thesis
was “leaked” to the former president of the Tunisian Astronomical
Association, who checked that it was not a hoax and then quickly rang
the alarm by posting on Facebook the general conclusions of the thesis,
verbatim.
Gulf News readers may recall that two years ago, I wrote a column
lamenting the talk that a Saudi cleric had given in the UAE insisting
that Earth does not rotate, neither around itself nor around the Sun; I
described the moment as a “debacle” and tried to draw lessons from it.
This new scandal is much worse, because it does not come from a cleric
(that was bad enough) but rather from a PhD student in science, her
supervisor held the Professor rank (the highest in academia), and they
were explicitly rejecting major parts of modern science.
They also went further than just submit a thesis, they published a paper
(in an obscure and disreputable journal) presenting “physical and
astronomical arguments” for geo-centrism (Earth being central and fixed
in the universe).
The paper is available online, and anyone can quickly check that both
the paper and the journal are worthless: countless grammatical errors,
mediocre references, puny scientific arguments; the journal is
classified as “fake and predatory”, one of those “pay and we’ll publish
your article quickly, with no reviewing or editing”...
I don’t mean to belabour the point, but it is worth citing a few ideas
from the general conclusion given at the end of the thesis, if at least
to fully impress upon the reader the size of the calamity that has just
occurred — before we analyse its causes.
The “results” of this doctoral thesis include: the Earth is flat and
young, and it stands immobile at the centre of the universe, which is
made of only one galaxy; the sun’s diameter is 1,135km (not 1.4 million
km), the moon is 908 km wide, and they lie 687 and 23 times closer to
Earth, respectively; there are 11 planets; stars are “limited” in number
and have a diameter of 292 km (not millions of km).
How does one explain such stunning ignorance of basic astronomy, coupled
with such brashness and insolence — rejecting Copernicus, Kepler,
Newton, Einstein, Hubble, and everything in science?
In this particular case, I believe this was due to an adherence to
religious, scriptural literalism, in other words taking the meanings of
religious texts literally and blindly, at the cost of rejecting all
knowledge that appears to contradict it, no matter how much evidence
supports it.
Indeed, we find in the conclusions of the thesis clear indications of
this stand and approach, expressions such as: “using physical and
religious arguments”, “also proving the world scale of [Noah’s] flood”,
“proposed a new kinematic approach that conforms to the verses of the
Quran”, “the roles of the stars are: (1) to be ornaments of the sky; (2)
to stone the devils; and (3) as signs to guide creatures in the darkness
of earth”; and finally “the geo-centric model... accords with the verses
of the Quran and the pronouncements of our Prophet.”
Comeback
Flat-Earthism has lately been making a comeback and spreading like bush
fire through social media.
Search for “flat earth” on YouTube and you’ll find almost a million
videos; “flat earth society” gets 400,000 pages on the web; “flat earth
proof” gets you 200,000 pages; etc.
But this social media trend I attribute to people’s inclination toward
conspiracy theories: “Nasa has faked the moon-landing”; “Nasa photoshops
space images”; “Give us real proofs that these interplanetary spacecraft
are factual”; etc.
In 2001, when the internet was still young, and the “moon-landing hoax”
was just emerging as a trending meme (without social media to support
its spread), I gave several talks titled “Did Nasa fake the moon
landing... or are we miserably failing to educate the public?”
But the latest shocking event (the PhD thesis) implies that we are not
only failing to educate the public (that is manifest in the trendy “flat
earth” and “Nasa lies” memes on social media) but also our brightest
students.
It has been reported that the PhD student had previously graduated at
the top of her class.
What we are failing to clarify and communicate is how to distinguish
between scientific knowledge (facts, models, theories, etc.) and
religious knowledge (what verses mean and what they intend to teach us).
I believe the Arab-Muslim world will continue to suffer educational and
cultural crises, not to mention a total lack of understanding of
science, until it properly digests the different methodologies of
science and religion, without diminishing the value of each.
Nidhal Guessoum is a professor of physics and astronomy at the American
University of Sharjah. You can follow him on Twitter at:
www.twitter.com/@NidhalGuessoum.
[*/quote*]
Logged
worelia
Boltbender
Jr. Member
Posts: 316
Kharroubi Amira: The earth is the center of the universe! And it is
flat!
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2017, 10:53:29 PM »
Why does Nidhal Guessoum not give any names? It does not take much to
find Kharroubi Amira as the infamous PhD student and Touir Jamel as
being the professor involved.
The quotes Nidhal Guessoum cites in his article, where are they in the
original???
This is the relatively short text of the "thesis":
http://www.theijst.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/9.-ST1608-011.pdf
As the original pdf file is gone, interested readers can find a copy
with the web archive:
http://web.archive.org/web/20160925142646/http://www.theijst.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/9.-ST1608-011.pdf
[*quote*]
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLEDGE
The Geocentric Model of the Earth: Physics and Astronomy Arguments
Kharroubi Amira
Ph.D. Student, Department of Geography, National Engineering School of
Sfax, Sfax University,
Laboratory Water, Energy, Environment (L3E), Sfax, Tunisia
Touir Jamel
Lecturer, Department of Geography, Faculty of Sciences of Sfax, Sfax
University,
Laboratory Water, Energy, Environment (L3E), Sfax, Tunisia
Abstract:
Several astronomical observations have shown the presence of numerous
failings in heliocentric model such as Mercury
retrograde motion, cosmic rays and Perseids meteors. Numerous
researchers are talking about these topics. Because there
is no empirical evidence that the Earth actually orbits the sun,
astronomy observations/ geophysics arguments provide
proofs for the steady Earth and the Sun’s motion. The main contention of
the paper is to demonstrate the flaws in gravity and
relativity, and to disprove the alleged motions of the earth that for so
long time has been unjustifiably taught.
Keywords: Earth, Sun, revolution, physics, retrograde motion, solar
system
1. Introduction
Understanding cosmos occupies an extremely significant position in
scientific researches. Since antiquity, the Earth is considered stable
without any motion and it is the center of this universe (geocentric
model). However, Nicolas Copernic, Kepler and Galileo findings show,
that the Earth is not stationary (heliocentric model) and that it has
nine motions. This heliocentric model, which leans in illusion, takes
the example of a ship state leaving the port. In this case, the ship
appears stationary (in reality it is in motion) and the port (fixed on
reality) move from his initial position. Then, starting with a
hypothesis, we try to explain an observation by insisting on the theory
accuracy. This led to suggest illogical theory which becomes a reality,
forgetting that it is an assumption. Since the inception of this
mathematical theory, it has confronted several problems leading to
propose new hypotheses to justify its validity.
First, there has been an explanation of the four seasons’ alternation by
the assumption of an annual Earth spinning around the Sun in an elliptic
orbit. Second, there has been an explanation of the planet’s motion
around the Sun by suggesting the existence of gravitational force
between different planets. Third, the justification of night/ day
alternation has been proposed by suggesting the Earth daily revolution
around its imaginary axis. In addition, the temperature change is
explained during the four seasons via the postulation of 23.5 °
inclination of the Earth rotation axis to its orbit around the Sun.
Also, the assumption of a huge distance between Earth / Sun unites the
mathematical theory and physical knowledge. Furthermore, sunspots are
justified by suggesting that the Sun rotates around itself. Moreover,
the Moon rotation is supposed monthly, not daily, around the Earth from
west to east (contradict with observation). And suggesting that there
was fixed stars’ motion: according to Einstein the entire universe is in
permanent motion.
For some years, scientific researches have evolved towards a more
coherent understanding of nature and universes. So, several physicists
and astronomers have demonstrated the presence of several flaws in
earlier theories.
[1-5] refute the works and the methodology (inductive arguments) of
Newton for the reason that is a “chimera” not related to any
observation. According to [6-12], they show the presence of numerous
gaps in Newton and Einstein laws “Relativityis fundamentally wrong...”
[6].
Hence, the heliocentric theory, and all related theories, based only on
theoretical proposals have never been argued by terrestrial observations
of the sky or through satellite images or Moon [13] said: “However, if
we stay and observe it for a few hours, it will not change its position
in the sky. This is strange behavior, since here on the Earth we are
used to seeing the Moon moving across the sky from east to west”). Thus,
all the complex calculations and “imaginary” assumptions, which are not
related to any veracity, are only solutions to the problems faced by
this theory. The purpose of this paper is to prove through a variety of
arguments, taking into account all the previous flaws of the
heliocentric model, the stationarity of the Earth in the universe and
the Sun spinning around it.
2. Methods
Falsifiability of hypothesis or theory is an intrinsic possibility to
prove it to be false. In order to prove Earth stationarity in the cosmos
and Sun’s motion, aside bibliographic data, a profound review of two
complementary fields is used. On the one hand, we have used physical/
geophysical arguments (hydrodynamic laws, atmospheric characteristics,
mass-energy equivalence formula, neutrinos speed, gravity formula,
objects kinematics). On the other, we have employed self-observations
(daily surveillance of the Moon positions,
57
Vol 4 Issue 8
August, 2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
www.theijst.com
daily observation of the sun/Moon shifting, surveillance of the shadow
direction, surveillance of sunrise time at the equinox,
observation of the star’s position, laboratory experiment).
3. Result and Discussion
3.1. Bibliographic Data
First, Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887 [14] shows the stationarity
of the Earth. A light ray is split into two perpendicular component
paths, A and B have an equal length. Path A is in the direction of Earth
motion and path B at a right angle to A.expected that, due to Earth
motion, the time to travel path A would be less than the time to travel
path B, but no such interferencenoted. The two light beams arrived at
the same time proving then the Earth stationarity.
Second, [15-16]show the existence of particles traveling faster than the
light speed. When he experienced his system of wireless transmission of
energy, [15] transmitted longitudinal electric waves through the
interior of the Earth, which propagate at a speed oftimes the light
speed. Based on satellite data from Pioneer 10 and 11 [16] shows the
existence of an “anomalous” Doppler shift inradio signals received from
these satellites. The Iraqi nuclear physicist [17-18] demonstrated that
energy isn’t related to the masshe proposed a new mass-energy
equivalence formula (E= m*b*c, where b is a new derived universal
constant in term of speedand equal 0.2014 of light speed). The works of
[19-23] in the quantum cosmology show the existence of a faster than
light speeds.
Physicists at the CERN laboratory, [24-27] prove the existence of
superluminal particles called neutrinos travel faster than thespeed. The
mass-energy equivalence formula (E=mc2) is defined when “c” is constant
and it is the maximum speed ofFurthermore, when “c” is a constant,
energy must be proportional to the mass, but in the case of neutrinos,
we are in the opposite condition. The neutrino mass equal 0.06 electron
volts (eV), which is far less than a billionth of the mass of a proton
(1.67262E-270,938273 GeV) = 1,06959E-37kg and energy = 10 6 GeV)
[28-34]. As shown above, “c” is variable, mass is not related to
energy,formula must be revised. Since the general relativity formula,
physically unproven and incompatible with quantum mechanics, isthere are
not any justifications for the Earth spinning.
Third, NAZA scientific findings shows that Sun has a revolution not
around Earth but around the Lactic Way Galaxy and it has aapex (the
velocity of the Sun's orbit around the galaxy is about 220 km/s and thus
its orbital period is about 240 million yearsThis apex is an imaginary
point in the Hercules constellation, near the bright star Vega (the
speed of the Sun = 20km/s). Accordingthis fact, heliocentric model (Sun
is fixed in solar system) is rejected.
As well known, all planets have a retrograde motion. If the Sun has an
attraction force on planets to make them spinning, we never perceive
this motion kind. According to the heliocentric model, planets motions
have constantly a counterclockwise direction around Sun exempt Venus and
Uranus (clockwise direction) [36]. The observation of this retrograde
motion and the rotation direction leadsuspect the entire heliocentric
theory.
Also, depending on the planets arrangement in the solar system, Mercury
is at a distance of 58 million km (0.39 AU) from the SunPluto in 6000
million km (39 AU). Since the Sun’s attraction force reaches Pluto, and
in order to make it spinning, the Mercury rotation cannot be held
regarding the magnitude of the gravitational influence. At such
condition, the planet Mercury should haveswallowed by the Sun.
It is
is
1.6
the
and
units
light
light.
kg=
this
false,
solar
[35].
to
us
and
been
3.2. Sun / Moon Observations
A daily observation of the Moon for a lunar month shows the existence of
different rising positions. Currently, the crescents progress during
each lunar month is explained by the Moon monthly revolution around
Earth. But, this is unacceptable because we see every night Moon during
the first half of lunar month rising from its appearance point and
continuing revolution to the West until disappearance under the West
horizon. During the 14th night, the Moon goes across the sky from the
extreme East to the extreme West. During the first and the second half
of lunar month, the Moon rises from West and East respectively, but its
propagation direction is always from East to West. This is clearly
visible during the first and the second half of lunar month for the
earliest and the latest half of night correspondingly. If the Moon
follows the Earth rotation from West to East, we no longer observe these
rising positions during the lunar month. The record of the Moon
position, daily at the sunset, during a lunar month allows drawing its
analemma. Indeed, thus obtained analemma shape shows the “eight number”
providing then the Moon kinematic. Such configuration reflects the Moon
intertropical journey. If the Moon completes a single revolution around
the earth monthly (heliocentric model) the analemma must be elliptical.
Then, regarding the analemma shape and observations, the Moon revolves
around the earth daily. The diversity of the rising positions is
explicated then by the following cycle:
The Moon starts its journey from the equator ? goes to the Capricorn
tropic ? go back to the equator (14th day) ? goes to the
Cancer tropic ? come back to the equator for a new cycle.
A direct observed phenomenon allows proving the earth stationarity. This
one consists to register the position of the moon and the sun, in the
sky, during a lunar month after an eclipse event (when sun, moon and
earth are aligned). Let us take the case of the heliocentric model. If
the Sun is fixed at a distance of 150M km from the earth, the moon has a
backward motion with a slow velocity at 340000 km and the Earth have a
forward move with a more important speed than the moon. With time
progress, the angle a between the line of the earth/sun and the
earth/moon increase rapidly contrasting with observation. For the
geocentric model where the earth is steady, the sun, and the moon have a
forward motion. Sun speed is lightly fast then the moon and the distance
between celestial bodies is more convincing. With time progress, the
angle a between the line of earth/sun and earth/moon increase regularly
(the shifting angle is 11,9° daily) in agreement with sky surveillance
(Fig.1). During the first half of the lunar month, the moon position in
the sky is behind the sun and distance between them begin tiny then it
increases progressively until the fourteen day of the month where it
gets
58
Vol 4 Issue 8
August, 2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com
at the maximum (the sun at the extreme west and the moon at the extreme
east). During the second half of the month, the moon position in the sky
is in front of the sun and angle between them decrease regularly until
the sun reach the moon at the twenty-eighth day. At the new crescent
this cycle starts again.
Figure 1: Position of sun and moon in the sky
Another observation allows suspecting the heliocentric model. In the
same meridian, time is identical especially at the equinoxthe Sun
position is on equator: The Sun rises typically from south to north of
the meridian at an equal time. If the Earth axis23.5° tilt to the orbit,
in the same meridian, Sunrise must have an important time difference
(Fig. 2). This time difference presents23.5°. Then, according to the
Earth tilt, longitude line passes from the two poles form 23.5° to the
equinox Sunrise line. Subsequently, the last one must pass through the
extremity East and West of polar circle at north and south hemisphere
respectively. This situationnever observed. Therefore, if we suppose a
perpendicular position of Earth to the Sun at the equinox, Sunrise time
will be identicalthe same meridian. Since the Sunrise time at the
equinox is identical for the countries located in the same meridian,
23.5° inclination of the Earth axis is rejected.
when
has a
a
is
on
Figure 2: Variation of Sunrise line if Earth has a 23.5° inclination
axis
For insurance, the surveillance of shadow direction as seen in figure
(3) shows its relationship with the Sun position as following:
• The Sun revolves around Earth (Earth is fixed); the object shadow
direction shows a corresponding with the direction of solar
rays (Fig. 3, S1): this case is observed.
• If we check the heliocentric model (experienced in the laboratory),
the object shadow direction formed a diverse angle with
the solar rays (Fig. 3, S2): this case is never observed.
The observations of shadow direction show that Sun revolves around
Earth.
59
Vol 4 Issue 8
August, 2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com
Figure 3: Variation of shadow direction
3.3. Critic of the Earth Characteristic in the Theoretical Orbit
First, in climatology, if the Earth is nearer to the Sun about 1° this
causes its burn and if it moves away the Sun about 1° this causes
glaciations of all the Earth. The imaginative orbit of the Earth around
the Sun, along the year, is elliptic (different diameters) (Fig.This
assumption means that the Earth revolves around Sun with different
distances, but nothing is observed (not total burnglaciations during the
year). This fact explains that the “imaginative” orbit does not exist
and that Earth is fixed in the space without any motion.4).
or
Figure 4: Variation of the distance Earth/Sun in the elliptic orbit
Second, Earth has a volume, a weight and a revolution speeds
(theoretical). In the motion dynamic, objects speeds are related to its
weight. If the Earth has its different motions, the falling of the
thousands of asteroids and meteors on the Earth every day must influence
the motions velocities. These objects cause the decreasing of the speed
and everything will be attached to the Earth surface, the duration of
night/day will be longer. But nothing is observed and every day the
numbers of meteors increase without any changes.
In addition, in the heliocentric model, seasons result from 23.5 °
inclination of the Earth rotation axis to its elliptic orbit around the
Sun. But, the defect of this model is the position of winter and summer
in the orbit. Winter appears when Earth is in perihelion (closer
position to the Sun); the temperature decrease is attributed to the
Earth speed which become faster (34.145km/s) than the average speed
(29.829km/s). Summer appear when Earth is in aphelion; the temperature
increase is attributed to the Earth speed which is slower (28.851km/s)
than the average speed. Theoretically, this supposes the presence of
self-power for the Earth to enhance or reduce its velocity. This
suggestion has no argument to admit. Then, this conflict allows the
suspicion of the heliocentric model validity.
Furthermore, if the earth revolves around the sun we must observe a
clear parallax of the Sirius star, its size must be larger when the
earth is closer. If we take the position of the earth in its orbit
around the sun during the autumn equinox, after six months it will be in
the opposite position (spring equinox) at a distance equal to 299
Million kilometers. Thus, an observer on Earth should observe places in
the remote universe of 299 million km from its initial position.
Subsequently, he must observe this star in larger dimensions and a
different angle. Such situation never detected demonstrates the
stability of the earth and refutes the heliocentrism theory.
The calculation of gravitational force between Sun /Moon and Earth/Moon
shows that this interaction is more important between Sun/Moon. Since,
Sun/Moon attraction (4,38082E+20 N.m2/kg2) is higher than Earth/Moon
(1,98E+20 N.m2/kg2), the Moon cannot spin around the earth and we never
observe its evolution steps. This situation interferes with the
observation.
60
Vol 4 Issue 8
August, 2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com
For more elucidate, the polar star is a stationary since it indicates
the geographic north for peoples in Earth. The observations of skynight
in different times (for example, an hourly basis) show the same position
of this star without any motion contrasting withother stars. Such fact
proves that Earth is steady.
Also, if the Earth spins around the Sun in 365 days, its velocity must
be 108.000 Km/h, this value is 84 higher than the atmospheric sonic
speed (1200 Km/h). Taking into account the atmosphere characteristics, a
direct consequence of this velocity is to perceivehuge sound (sonic
boom) caused by this motion. But these sound never heard only if
supersonic plane across the sky. This situation could be interpreted by
assuming that the atmospheric layer acts as an insulating body. This
hypothesis cannot be admitting sincelisten to various types of sounds.
As consequence, the inexistence of sonic boom testifies the stationarity
of the earth.
3.4. The Objects Kinematic
First, if the Earth has an attraction force that is capable to hold and
attach the atmosphere during its rotation around itself, the Sunthe
other motions, we cannot detect the wind. Nevertheless, observations
show the presence of various categories of wind fromair up to gale wind
(the speed can overstep 50 knots). This fact confirms the absence of
Earth attraction.
Second, coastal dynamics researchers show that direction and wave height
are closely attached to the wind. If Earth spins aroundwith a speed of
1670 km / h we must find a single direction of the wave propagation
which will be necessarily East (dominates direction and speed). But
oceanographers have shown different wave propagation directions. The
presence of a numerous directionswave’s propagation, when the Earth is
rotating, assumes a higher carrying wind speed. This assumption is not
convincingextravagant wind speed of 1670km / h (910 mile/h) destroys any
sort of life on Earth rapidly. Regarding the Beaufort scale, the impact
of a wind speed exceeding 70 mile/h on sea/ continental state causes
catastrophic damage in the infrastructure and trees.comparison of speeds
we cannot admit any motion for the earth.
Third, the presence of balancing rocks and stacking stones in lakes and
rivers in numerous countries for several times is a powerful tool to
reveal the earth stationarity. If the Earth rotated around itself, the
Sun, the galaxy, the apex and for the universe expansions, these rocks
would move in any direction. But, the immovability of these rocks for a
long time shows the validity of the geocentric theory.
In the hydrology science, water is maintained stable in lakes / rivers
if there are not any atmospheric perturbations. The observationenormous
water bodies stable conflict with the Earth motions. This reality
reveals that Earth is steady.
The kinematic of the space rockets collide with the earth supposed
dynamic. If we assume that the Earth makes different motionsthe same
time, it means it must travel far from the point of the rocket launch.
Then, when the mission is accomplished it cannotthe position of the
Earth which would be further away. In addition, the maximum speed of a
rocket is 28000 km / h but the Earth’s speeds are much more important
(108000 km/h, 220km/s). Since the speeds of the Earth are greater than
the rockets one, theynever return to Earth. But, observations show that
the rockets return quickly and easily to the Earth. Moreover, the
satelliteslocated at a fixed distance from the Earth, if they move a
meter we cannot pick up any signal (for example: satellite dish are
placeda well determined direction, GPS). Then, the obtaining of these TV
channels diversity and the positioning at any times interferethe Earth
dynamics (revolves around itself (1670km/h), around the Sun (108000km /
h), around the galaxy (220km/s) and forexpansion of the universe).
Assuming the earth motions, these satellites must change their velocity
permanently, to conservepositions to the Earth. But, satellites don’t
have a self-power allowing them to enhance or reduce their speed. Such
result, testifiesearth stability.
Moreover, if the Earth has it different speeds motions, we cannot obtain
a high detection pictures from geostationary satellites orthe Moon. In
fact, at such high speeds, the taken pictures must be blurry. The
observation of diver’s high detected earth images conflict with these
motions.
Finally, on any clear night, a shooting star can be seen in the sky
about every ten minutes (for example the Perseids meteors observed
between 11 August and 13 August 2014). It is commonly observed that many
more meteors are seen in the early morning hours, between midnight and
sunrise; then, they are seen in the evening between Sunset and midnight.
If the Earth has different motions,cannot observe these meteors and
cosmic rays every day bombarding the Earth’s surface. This situation
could be explained byexistence of the Earth in the same position in the
cosmos.
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, various physics arguments and astronomy observations show
the stability of the Earth in the universe and the sun,moon, the stars
and the planets motion around it. Then the heliocentric model must to be
rejected. On the contrary, the revision ofgeocentric model will be
necessary. Consequently, the Sun revolves around Earth daily in 23h
56min 4.1Second from East to West.
5. References
i. Popper Karl Raimund (2002), The Logic of Scientific Discovery.
Psychology Press, 513 page
ii. Duhem Pierre Maurice Marie (1962), The Aim and Structure of
Physical. Theory Book published by Princeton University
Press, 351pages.
iii. Davies (2003), The Newtonian Myth. Studies in History and
Philosophy of Sciences, 34, 763–780
iv. Khiari (2011), Newton’s laws of motion revisited: some
epistemological and didactic problems. Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ.,5, No. 1,
v. Maxwell Nicholas (2014), Three Criticisms of Newton’s Inductive
Argument in the Principia. Advances in Historical
Studies. Vol.3 , No.1, 2-11,
61
Vol 4 Issue 8
August,at
the
a
we
and
light
itself
of
since
By
of
at
find
can
are
in
with
the
its
the
from
we
the
the
the
Vol.
2016
The International Journal Of Science & Technoledge (ISSN 2321 – 919X)
http://www.theijst.com
vi.vii.viii.ix.x.xi.xii.xiii.xiv.xv.xvi.xvii.xviii.xix.xx.xxi.xxii.xxiii.xxiv.xxv.xxvi.xxvii.xxviii.xxix.xxx.xxxi.xxxii.xxxiii.xxxiv.xxxv.xxxvi.Escultura
(2003), The flux theory of gravitation XVII. The new mathematics and
physics. Applied MathematicsComputation 138 , - 127–149,
Scharma (2006), Einstein derived Erest = Mrest c2 from a NON-EXISTENT
equation: A Discussion. The general Science
Journal
Afriat Alexender and Ermenegildo Caccese (2010), The relativity of
inertia and reality of nothing. Studies in HistoryPhilosophy of Modern
Physics 41, 9 –26,
Kochetkov (2013), Confirmation of results of the experiments of
Michelson without the postulate about the invariance ofspeed of light.
Millennium relativity, The general Science journal
Mathis (2013), The greatest standing errors in physics and mathematics.
Book (http://milesmathis.com/index.html).
Chun-Xuan Jiang(2014), The discovery of primordial gravitational waves
is 100% wrong. The general Science Journal
Lehmkurl Dennis (2014), Why Einstein did not believe that general
relativity geometrizes gravity. Studies in HistoryPhilosophy of Modern
physics, Vol 46, Part B, Pages 316–326, (2014).
Jayant V. Narlicar (1999), Seven Wonders of the Cosmos. Cambridge
University Press, 15 avr , 324 pages.
Michelson Albert and Edward Morley (1887), On the relative motion of the
earth and the aluminiferous ether. American
journal of science, Volume XXXIV, No 203 (1887),
Tesla Nicolas (1905), Art of transmitting electrical energy through the
natural medium. United States Patent Office, Serial
No. 113,034,
Lammertink Arend (2013), Electrical Engineer disproves Einsteins
Relativity Theory: The Ruins of 106 Years Relativity.
Tuks Unsorted KieknWat TWordt Stuff
Bahjat R. J. Muhyedeen (2009), New Concept of Mass-Energy Equivalence.
European Journal of Scientific Research,
Vol.26No.2, pp.161-175,
Bahjat R. J. Muhyedeen (2013), Nuclear Magneton Theory of Mass
Quantization "Unified Field Theory". European Journal
of Scientific Research, Vol. 100, No 1, pp.66-140,
Carlip S (2000), Aberration and the speed of gravity. Physics Letters A,
267, 81–87,
Galperin (2008), Information transmittal and time uncertainty, measuring
the speed of light and time of reflection,
representations of Newton’s second law and related problems. Computers
and Mathematics with Applications, 56, 1271–
1290,
Pedram and Jalalzadeh (2008), Quantum cosmology with varying speed of
light: Canonical approach. Physics Letters B,1–6,
Brax (2012), Lorentz invariance violation in modified gravity. Physics
Letters B, 712, 155–160,
Pfeifer and Wohlfarth (2012), Beyond the speed of light on Finsler
spacetimes. Physics Letters B, 712, 284–288,
Bouchard (2012), Finite Theory of the Universe, Dark Matter Disproof and
Faster-Than-Light Speed. Physics Procedia,222-241,
Katz U.F. and Spiering Ch. 704 (2012), High-energy neutrino
astrophysics: Status and perspectives. Progress in ParticleNuclear
Physics, 67, 651-,
Bertolucci Sergio (2013), Neutrino speed: a report on the speed
measurements of the BOREXINO, ICARUS andexperiments with the CNGS beam.
Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.), 235–236, 289–295,
Chun-Xuan Jiang (2014), An equation that changed the universe: F =-
mc2/R. The general Science Journal,
Ishihara Aya (2013), Ultra-high energy neutrinos with IceCube. Nuclear
Physics B (Proc. Suppl.), 235–236, 352–357,
Zhou Lingli and Bo-Qiang Ma (2013), Neutrino speed anomaly as signal of
Lorentz violation. Astroparticle Physics, 44,27,
Hernandez-Rey Juan José (2013), High energy neutrino telescopes in the
Northern Hemisphere. Nuclear InstrumentsMethods in Physics Research A,
725, 7 –12,
Zhehui Wang, Christopher L. Morris (2013), Tracking fast neutrons.
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research
A, 726, 145 –15 4,
Abe et al (2014), Observation of Electron Neutrino Appearance in a Muon
Neutrino Beam. Physical review letters, PRL061802,
Foley James A (2014), Mass of Neutrinos Accurately Calculated for First
Time, Physicists Report. Nature World News.
(available in www.natureworldnews.com/articles/ 5968/
20140210/mass-neutrinos-accurately-calculated-first-time-
physicists-report.htm)
Shigeru Yoshida (2014), Ultra-high-energy cosmic neutrinos: at 1015eV
energies and above. Comptes Rendus Physique,
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 309–317,
Paul R. Weissman (2007), Encyclopedia of the Solar System, Second
Edition , Chapter 1 - The Solar System and Its Placethe Galaxy, Pages
1-28.
Véronique Dehant, Tim Van Hoolst (2014), Encyclopedia of the Solar
System, Third Edition, Chapter 8 - RotationPlanets, Pages 159-184.
62
Vol 4 Issue 8
August,and
and
the
and
660,
38,
and
LVD
24–
and
112,
in
of
2016
[*/quote*]
« Last Edit: April 13, 2017, 11:12:18 PM by worelia »
Logged
worelia
Boltbender
Jr. Member
Posts: 316
The big cover-up
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2017, 11:39:28 PM »
The mysterious disappearance leads to the question how real the whole
appearance was. And, yes, it was real!
http://web.archive.org/web/20160923190529/http://www.theijst.com/2016-2/august-16
[*quote*]
15 The Geocentric Model of the Earth: Physics and Astronomy Arguments
Kharroubi Amira & Touir Jamel
[View] [Download PDF]
22 9
[*/quote*]
Between numbers 14 and 16 is number 15:
[*quote*]
14
Employee Development Strategies and Employees’ Commitment among Academic
Staff of Universities in Ekiti State, Nigeria
Adelugba Bisola Iyabo, Ajayi Omobola M., Ogunkolade S. O., Enitilo
Olalekan & Gbadebo A.
[View] [Download PDF]
17 9
15
The Geocentric Model of the Earth: Physics and Astronomy Arguments
Kharroubi Amira & Touir Jamel
[View] [Download PDF]
22 9
16
Climate Change Effects on Rainfall Patterns and It’ S Implications on
Sorghum and Millet Production in Kenya: A Review
A. Egesa Ogolla, N. Njau, P. Mwirigi, C. Muui W., N. Korir Kibet & M.
Mwangi
[View] [Download PDF]
31 25
[*/quote*]
Today there is a vacuum...
http://www.theijst.com/2016-2/august-16
[*quote*]
14
Study of Thunderstorms over a Madhya Pradesh Region, India
Shweta Thakur, Rahul Shrivastava & Varsha Kachneriya
[View] [Download PDF]
118 65
15
Employee Development Strategies and Employees’ Commitment among Academic
Staff of Universities in Ekiti State, Nigeria
Adelugba Bisola Iyabo, Ajayi Omobola M., Ogunkolade S. O., Enitilo
Olalekan & Gbadebo A.
[View] [Download PDF]
146 70
16
Climate Change Effects on Rainfall Patterns and It’ S Implications on
Sorghum and Millet Production in Kenya: A Review
A. Egesa Ogolla, N. Njau, P. Mwirigi, C. Muui W., N. Korir Kibet & M.
Mwangi
[View] [Download PDF]
212 207
[*/quote*]
Weird. The list was rearranged, and the article did not only vanish, no,
it was replaced. There were 22 articles, and after the disappearance
there still are 22 articles...
Logged
Krant
Jr. Member
Posts: 156
Re: The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2017, 05:21:20 PM »
In der Schule lernt man, daß die Griechen vor 2000 Jahren den
Durchmesser der Erdkugel berechnet haben. Wie konnte die Menschheit
seitdem nur so verblöden?
Logged
SolianKant
Newbie
Posts: 2
Re: The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2017, 06:37:45 PM »
Gue Frage.
Logged
RubyCat
Jr. Member
Posts: 223
Re: The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2017, 02:10:58 PM »
Ama sagt, das sei ein Wolf-Mangelsyndrom. Mehr Wölfe in den Städten und
die Evolution kommt wieder auf Kurs.
Ich würde ja noch ein paar Tiger spendieren. Mindestens...
Logged
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[*/quote*]
--
Homöopathie ist nichts als Hütchenspielerbetrug und organisierte Kriminalität
http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/565.htm http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/570.htm
http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/585.htm http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/643.htm
http://ariplex.com/folia/archives/647.htm
Helmut Wabnig
2017年5月17日 下午6:13:412017/5/17
收件者：
On Thu, 18 May 2017 01:59:37 +0400, Happy Oyster <-*-*.@.*-*-> wrote:
>The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
>
>http://transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=9204
>
>[*quote*]
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1
>May 17, 2017, 09:58:02 PM
>Welcome, Guest
>
>News:.
>Atoms deactivated. --- 0 Kelvin reached.
>
>TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1 >
>FRAUENPOWER! >
>~~~ FRAUENPOWER! ~~~ >
>The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
>
>Author
>worelia
>Boltbender
>Jr. Member
>
>The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
snip.
>The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
>
>http://transgallaxys.com/~kanzlerzwo/index.php?topic=9204
>
>[*quote*]
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1
>May 17, 2017, 09:58:02 PM
>Welcome, Guest
>
>News:.
>Atoms deactivated. --- 0 Kelvin reached.
>
>TG-1 * Transgallaxys Forum 1 >
>FRAUENPOWER! >
>~~~ FRAUENPOWER! ~~~ >
>The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
>
>Author
>worelia
>Boltbender
>Jr. Member
>
>The earth is the center of the universe! And it is flat!
No doubt, Earth is a flat disk!
And those who fall down from the rim end up in Australia!
w.
0 則新訊息