Input for the agenda for Wednesday's CDI meeting

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Hilde Orten

unread,
Jun 9, 2025, 6:23:27 AMJun 9
to ddi...@googlegroups.com, Rizzolo, Flavio - CSDS/CNSD, Flavio Rizzolo

Hi all,

 

We’ll meet again with the CDI group on Wednesday June 11th at the usual time.

 

At our last meeting it was agreed to move forward with the GitHub issues (see minutes), and Input from the sub-groups is a recurring agenda item.

 

Please get back to us by tomorrow if you have suggestions for additional topics.

 

Great if you Flavio will chair the meeting as last time 😊

 

Best wishes,

 

Hilde

Hilde Orten

unread,
Jun 10, 2025, 5:05:33 AMJun 10
to ddi...@googlegroups.com, Rizzolo, Flavio - CSDS/CNSD, Flavio Rizzolo

Hi all,

 

Here is the agenda for tomorrow’s meeting:

 

Agenda June 11th

  1. Admin
    1. Info about the next Hackathon. Call for challenges in the summer
  2. GitHub issues
    1. CORS problem accessing context (issue 21) https://github.com/ddi-cdi/ddi-cdi/issues/21
    2. Other Github issues, following from last meeting (see minutes).
  3. Length of predicate names optimized for AI
  4. Input from the sub-groups
  5. AOB

Meeting link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83808128370?pwd=X4b5ZYz3nJDhSOnEaa8S2KqeaD7f3A.1

Flavio will chair the meeting.

 

Looking forward to talking to you tomorrow!

 

Best wishes,

 

Hilde

--
DDI-CDI (Cross Domain Integration), https://ddialliance.org/Specification/DDI-CDI/
Email list archive at: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/ddi-cdi
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DDI-CDI" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ddi-cdi+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ddi-cdi/AM7P192MB07380ACF7B82C53F6188E7BCF06BA%40AM7P192MB0738.EURP192.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM.

Joachim Wackerow

unread,
Jun 10, 2025, 5:14:25 AMJun 10
to 'Hilde Orten' via DDI-CDI

Thanks for this.

Sorry, I won't be available on Wednesday.

re: Length of predicate names

My concern is here that we should not only consider to optimize something for a specific purpose but the names should be interoperable between syntax representations. The goal should be that a metadata instance should be  transformable from one syntax representation to another without large effort and without loss of information. I know there are some limitations/requirements but this goal should be a guideline.

Flavio Rizzolo

unread,
Jun 11, 2025, 10:03:27 AMJun 11
to ddi...@googlegroups.com
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages