Hi All,
I think arranging the board meeting sooner rather than later is a good idea. As for a better way to communicate with the board, I agree we need some sort of mechanism. I have been getting more less complimentary comments recently, mainly following the rate increase and then once the recent bylaw change was sent out via email. This is in passing from Fellows at USAID, who I see the most.
Setting up a Google Group would allow us to see all the feedback. We would still need a system to ensure we responded with one voice though i.e., we discuss off-board and then one of the Board members posts the response, when it wasn't a toe fungus question or the like where we could offer a stock response that 'we're sorry about your problem but this is outside of the scope of the Board. Please contact XX."
The other option for the short term is to share all the emails with the entire Board that are raising these issues so we are aware of them, to again flag those that need a Board response, and then to divvy up responses to them. This is less transparent though and would not allow for members to see the questions and responses posted by others.
Regards,
Teressa
Thanks for the clarification, David.
I don't think a Google group without moderation and Board participation is actually feasible. If its not planned that the Board will be participating and that this will just be for members to communicate, than I would not recommend setting it up. You may find this will turn into the kind of negative space that you referenced in your original email, particularly since we have a few people who we know are upset with the Board.
I general, I think that we do a poor job of communicating with the membership and finding a way to make the questions we receive and responses more public would be good.
As for what I hear at work, USAID fellows have complained about the premium increase, not understanding why it was so high and feeling like it was not the best choice.
Second, there is also confusion about what Blue Cross Blue Shield covers when traveling that has been a recent issue for fellows where they have had claims denied. Blue Cross Blue Shield should not have been their primary coverage in these cases, Fronteir Medex should have been which, AAAS provides to USAID fellows and maybe other? This is really something that we and AAAS should explain better since there's no one else to address the unique circumstances we face.
Also, no one seems to understand that neither of those covers you in a war zone i.e., Afghanistan or if there is a civil action taking place - Mali, South Sudan, Syria or the areas around it, etc. Yes, it's in the details of the plans but since it's an issue many fellows face, we may want to put in info in our FAQs about these kinds of issues and refer them to people who can answer these questions. You actually need separate, very expensive coverage in these locations. AAAS as our contracting agency should provide it. That's what the other contracting agencies at USAID do when they send their staff to Kabul, etc.
Finally, the Bylaw email came out of the blue. No one seems to know why we are considering this now.
Regards,
Teressa
Hi Heather,
Frontier Medex is AAAS' solution to the fact that USAID fellows need medical evacuation coverage when overseas. This is not something they provide to their regular staff. They have purchased a policy specifically for us because no regular health insurance plan that I know of in the US will provide this service. I expect they have found this was a better solution than to give us extra cash and tell us to get the coverage for each individual trip we take, but the latter is supposition on my part. It's almost certainly cheaper to purchase the group policy. It's often done for study abroad programs.
For back story, each of us was issued a copy of the Frontier Medex card back at the start of the year. I haven't used mine yet for this policy but have used them in the past when they were my carrier while I did my dissertation research in Bolivia. It's a decent med evac plan. It does not of course cover conflict zones and high risk sports (diving, parasailing, etc.) which is pretty standard.
Recently, a Fellow did not realize he should have used this to file a claim for a medical expense. That is how the topic came up. He was upset Blue Cross Blue Shield did not cover his expenses at an emergency room in a foreign country. He and another fellow both approached me about the fact that Blue Cross Blue Shield did not cover his claim which is how I learned about it.
I fully agree we should not provide the details about coverage but our FAQs could reference the unique circumstance of AAAS stipend fellows and overseas travel, directing them to AAAS or to Frontier Medex for this type of issue.
As for the rest, yes to October meeting. I am available for a call from 2-3 on Monday but not later. I may have some time on Tuesday afternoon as well.
Regards,
Teressa
Yes, that's a good idea. The information may now be available on Fellows Central but I haven't explored to see if it is and what it says.
Regards,
Teressa