Dear Todd and DCSTFI Board,
I am concerned about this explanation for the rate increase in our insurance premiums this year and would appreciate your response to the following,
1) How much of the increase in claims stated in explanation point 1 was due to the 14 claims of $10,000 or more listed in explanation point2? Are these essentially the same point?
2) Even if these 14 claims all came from different individuals they must still represent only a very small proportion of DCSTFI members. I was under the impression that the vast majority of members' claims never come near to exceeding our premiums. In justifying an increase, information about this end of the spectrum also needs to be reported. What is the total premium to total claims ration? What is the average annual claim to annual contribution (with standard deviations)? This information would provide better justification for an increase in premiums. Note that saying that this year you had to pay out $140,000 more than expected frankly sounds less like an explanation and more as though profits weren't as high as was hoped. Its no explanation at all.
3) Did the increase in premiums assume that high claims would continue to increase, and at nearly 75%, in the next year? Since we're such a small plan, rather than just make the sorts of assumptions justified with large, random populations, was an effort made to ascertain whether the same members are placing such claims and whether they expect them to continue?
4) The point of the ACA 85/15 rule is to reduce administrative costs when they surpass 15% of the overall cost of the plan NOT to raise the cost of the plan in order that excessive administrative costs are tweeked to constitute 15% of premiums. So explanation point 3 is highly questionable. Am I misunderstanding this?
5) I have yet to receive an explanation from the Board or from Todd about what happened to the 3.2% rebate to our plan that we were all informed about by CareFirst BCBS in a letter last summer dated July 10, 2012 and which was reportedly returned to DCSTFI by August 1, 2012. I've e-mail both the Board and Todd asking about this, but have received no answer. This definitely should have entered into any adjustment and should be part of the explanation for the increase --- are we actually realizing an increase of 18% and just being told 14.8%?
6) The statement that the trend you see in annual adjustments is a 12% increase doesn't mesh with our recent experience. Here are my quarterly rates and the changes over the last 5 years:
2008: 901.89
2009: 1034.49 increase of 14.7%
2010:1034.49 no change
2011: 955.47 decrease of 7.6%
2012: 1074.97 increase of 12.5%
If you want to say that *when* you have had to increase rates in recent years, you've increased of 12-14%, then ok. If you had to go back more than 5 years in order to get it to look like this increase is consistent with prior years, then let us know how far back you had to go --- the last 10? the last 15? But when making a statement about recent trends, the years of no change and negative change actually lowers the average adjustment factor. Unless this is more complicated than I think, I've had an average annual increase of about 5% over the last few years, so a 15% jump is a biggie. It really disturbs me to read something that strikes me as bogus in this explanation. Please clarify!
Ultimately I trust the Board members to be able to address these concerns, and so am continuing my membership. However, there are aspects of DCSTFI administration that sometimes suggest that the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. For example, while I have until May 24 for open enrollment decisions, I received an invoice assuming I would continue in the same plan requesting payment due by May 17! So it just may be the case that a few details have slipped through the cracks, especially in this May 6 Explanation of Renewal Process. I am eager to hear your response to my questions and concerns.
Thank you for your service with DCSTFI,
Best,
Robin Schafer