I think I may have a suggestion you guys could have already come up with.
While you review the users' evaluations I'm pretty sure there can be a number of patterns emerging where users mark some triples as errorneous but in fact these are not.
For example I have a number of times come accross triple like
dbpedia:something dbprop:yearFounded "2000"^^xsd:integer
Instinctively it seems not right since there is the xsd:Year datatype. However I wasn't really sure whether it actually is an error or maybe this is the intended way it should have been extracted. Thus a set of examples of what people can encouter and some guidelines how to react in common cases could be good and also spare some of your time.
Regards,
Tom
Hi again
I think I may have a suggestion you guys could have already come up with.
While you review the users' evaluations I'm pretty sure there can be a number of patterns emerging where users mark some triples as errorneous but in fact these are not.
For example I have a number of times come accross triple like
dbpedia:something dbprop:yearFounded "2000"^^xsd:integer
Instinctively it seems not right since there is the xsd:Year datatype. However I wasn't really sure whether it actually is an error or maybe this is the intended way it should have been extracted.
Thus a set of examples of what people can encouter and some guidelines how to react in common cases could be good and also spare some of your time.
Regards,
Tom
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DBpedia Data Quality" group.
To post to this group, send email to dbpedia-da...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to dbpedia-data-qua...@googlegroups.com.