

Hi Vicki thanks for detailed forum post.
The bright LED can create parasitic photocurrent in the refractory period pulse circuit such that the pixel cannot reset; the current can be so large that the pixel is simply held in reset because the pullup current set by the bias is smaller than the parasitic photocurrent. This is particularly true in Davis240 when we did not realize it might be a problem. Did you check to make sure to set a short refractory period (largish bias current RefrBp?)
I don't have time to reproduce the behavior now - we are working extremely hard on a chip design. But I can take a look after mid November to see if I can reproduce the effects with Davis346 and maybe Davis240.
Be warned that the computation of bias current in jAER is quite approximate, but it as shows the order of magnitude of the bias currents.
Please also read the v2e paper and if you are a circuits person then the original DVS128 paper has the most detailed description of the operation of the DVS pixel. The paper from me and Yuji [3] has detailed measurements of the effect of parasitic photocurrents in Davis346.
Good luck and look forward to more questions
Tobi
--