New Article: "David Suissa Really is a Complete Ashkenazi Idiot!"
David Shasha
David Suissa Really is a Complete Ashkenazi Idiot!
I have read many articles, mostly from the HASBARAH world, that emphatically reject the Iran Nuclear deal that was negotiated by the Obama administration.
I have seen the deal itself attacked, as well as the people who negotiated it, and those who are working to get it approved by Congress.
But to be honest, I have never seen anyone actually claim that President Obama actually wants to have the deal rejected by Congress.
That is until self-hating Sephardi David Suissa’s latest rant, one of the most incoherent pieces of thinking I have ever read:
The twisted logic of the article does not simply provide the usual HASBARAH talking points that we have become used to by this point.
In what can only be characterized as an insane act of PILPUL illogic, Suissa claims to know that in his heart the president knows this is a bad deal and secretly wishes for it to be rejected by Congress so that he can get a “better deal.”
Now there is no better deal in the offing; all that is left for the HASBARAH minions – under the control of their leader Benjamin Netanyahu, who seems to actually believe that he is part of the American political process rather than the leader of a different country – is to mask their warmongering against Iran with the fantasy that if they were in Geneva that they could have “magically” forced Iran and its allies to fully capitulate to Israel’s terms.
Zionism is of course rooted in magical thinking and the current HASBARAH hysteria over the Iran deal is part and parcel of a marked lack of realistic political thinking.
It would of course be much easier if the PILPUL was jettisoned and the HASBARAH voices spoke honestly: that they want war with Iran.
The loathsome David Brooks said as much in his column on the matter:
In his exact words:
It’s striking how little President Obama thought of the tools at his disposal. He effectively took the military option off the table. He didn’t believe much in economic sanctions.
It is of course untrue that Obama did not believe in sanctions; it is that during the difficult negotiations these sanctions were removed with the final agreement on principles.
But the idea that the president should leave the military option on the table is significant and speaks to the deep delusions of the Zionists.
Brooks has never served in the American military, but indeed we have learned that his son does in fact serve in the Israeli military:
http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/10/08/david-brooks-son-idf-times-public-editor/
There has been much discussion of how American Jews are currently showing more loyalty to Israel than to their elected government. It is indeed possible to disagree with your government and remain a loyal citizen. But as we have seen, the organized campaign mounted by Jewish groups is directly connected to Netanyahu’s affirmed policies, which he has presented in a speech to the US Congress:
All this is too much to process in a short note, but when we look at the insane pronouncements of HASBARAH puppets like Brooks and Suissa we see just how dual loyalty seems to be working today. It would be far easier – as Brooks’ son must surely know – to move to Israel and leave America alone.
For self-hating Sephardim like Suissa, moving to Israel would allow them to finally luxuriate in the racist Ashkenazi hegemony they so admire and once and for all be rid of any Sephardic pride and dignity.
To better understand this pathological self-hatred and its pernicious effects, we need look no further than Suissa’s previous column which castigates Jews for feeling shame at the recent murders perpetrated by Israeli Jewish extremists:
http://www.jewishjournal.com/david_suissa/article/why_do_jews_embrace_shame
A cursory reading of the article will show very clearly the love affair between Suissa and Ashkenazi rabbis. Not one Sephardi is cited in the article. I think that this love for the Ashkenazim is proof positive that Suissa has indeed “converted” and become a member of the very group that has sought to persecute and erase the Sephardim and their culture. That he demands that Barack Obama repudiate his own administration’s treaty is evidence that the PILPUL pathology of the Ashkenazim has truly consumed him.
I suppose we should close off the discussion with Suissa’s own words from his insane article on the Iran deal and Obama which shows his utter contempt for the Middle Eastern culture, which he characterizes in the following way:
Their archetype is not the “Say what I mean, mean what I say” American ideal, but the merchant in the souk who, when negotiating, never says what he means or means what he says.
It is indeed truly hard to believe that these words were written by an Arab Jew. Suissa’s loathing for the Middle Eastern marketplace would have you thinking that he is not a Moroccan Jew.
But this is what the Arab Jews are today; a group that hates itself and others, a theme I have explored in my article “Sephardi Typologies”:
Post-Script: After completing what I thought was the final version of this article, I discovered the following article in The Times of Israel that wraps the whole thing up in a pretty bow:
Oblivious to the fact that the Sephardic viewpoint does not appear in his Jewish Journal, Suissa states of his editor Rob Eshman:
“I respect Rob tremendously; I love the way he writes,” Suissa told JTA. “We’re very much on the same page in terms of wanting to have a paper that includes the broadest possible range of views. We really try to put our money where our mouth is. I piss off one half of the community, and he pisses off the other half.”
Suissa, who indeed sees himself as an Ashkenazi, processes the Jewish community and the way it perceives its interests solely in terms of that ethnicity. Sephardim have in fact become Ashkenazim, just like Suissa, and it is only Left and Right Wing positions that divide them.
Sadly, Suissa’s viewpoint is one that eliminates the possibility for Sephardim to have a voice in the discussion.
David Shasha