Uriel Heilman, "Is Yeshiva of Flatbush 'Predatory' in its Scrutiny of Girls' Attire?"
David Shasha
Is Yeshiva of Flatbush ‘Predatory’ in its Scrutiny of Girls’ Attire?
By: Uriel Heilman
The following article discusses an open letter that has become the talk of the Brooklyn Syrian Jewish community.
The issue being discussed is the attire of female students at the Yeshiva of Flatbush.
The following points should be kept in mind when reading the article:
1. The Sephardic Jewish community has embraced Ashkenazi Modern Orthodoxy in favor of its own heritage:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/davidshasha/flatbush/davidshasha/UZ9tN7Z2TAY/8pk5tGyNP4sJ
2. This assimilation has led to some very negative consequences that the Sephardic community itself does not really understand:
3. The fierce partisanship of the Ashkenazified Sephardic leaders helped enable the crimes of Rabbi Baruch Lanner, the former principal of the Hillel High School in Deal, New Jersey. The inaction of both rabbis and board members allowed Lanner to continue his abuse of students until he was exposed by journalist Gary Rosenblatt of The New York Jewish Week which led to his arrest and conviction for crimes committed in the Syrian Jewish community:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/davidshasha/labaton/davidshasha/ASZ9YE5oJSE/fCqSmRp4PN8J
Amazingly, after I posted my article on Rabbi Ezra Labaton, one of the most prominent of the Ashkenazified Sephardim, I received a scathing e-mail from one of his longtime supporters bitterly castigating me for my comments on the situation. The writer of the e-mail had the temerity not only to defend Rabbi Labaton’s silence and castigate me in the strongest terms, but to continue the Modern Orthodox attack on the Sephardic heritage and the work I have been doing to defend our tradition. But the most galling part of all was the writer’s truly bizarre defense of Lanner who he called a great Torah Sage, a Talmid Hacham, in spite of the crimes for which he was convicted.
Unfortunately, I have not been given permission by the writer of the e-mail to publish it in the SHU. Such moral cowardice has been typical of the Ashkenazified Sephardi Modern Orthodox who prefer to work in the shadows rather than in the clear light of day.
4. Modern Orthodoxy has over the course of time, since it was adopted as normative under the leadership of Isaac Shalom back in the 1950s, moved further and further to the Right. The current dress code that is being discussed is a product of the Haredi influence that continues to infect parts of the Modern Orthodox community.
It is to be remembered that the Yeshiva of Flatbush, like many other Modern Orthodox schools, draws its professional staff from a pool of rabbis and teachers coming from an Orthodox community whose values and standards have become stricter and more intolerant along the lines of the Haredi revolution that we have been tracking over the years.
5. As I read it, the open letter speaks to the influence of Open Orthodoxy as it demands a more prominent role for Feminist voices and values.
We have looked at the Open Orthodox issue before:
6. It is critical to note that whatever young female students are permitted to wear at the Yeshiva of Flatbush, the school’s values are clear:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/davidshasha/flatbush/davidshasha/jJ47QpSjZ4w/qfwHMoTm6MEJ
To sum up: While Feminist concerns should certainly be addressed in an enlightened and critical manner, the basic template of messianic Settler Zionism remains a foundational principle of the school and is not being addressed in the open letter.
While students seem to be very concerned about what they are allowed or not allowed to wear, there does seem to be consensus on Israel and Zionism and on the elimination of Sephardic history and culture when it comes to the school’s curriculum.
In the end Open Orthodoxy presents a very mixed bag of Zionist political radicalism and specific reforms of Orthodox praxis, particularly in the area of Feminism and Conversion.
As always, the problems of Sephardic continuity and of Israel’s militarism and religious messianism remain regardless of what other changes might take place.
Freedom to wear more
revealing clothing is one thing, freedom to think against the grain is quite
another.
DS
NEW YORK (JTA) – For years, Melissa Duchan had found the dress code for girls at her Orthodox school in Brooklyn, the Yeshivah of Flatbush, onerous.
But it wasn’t until recently that Duchan, 16, felt that scrutiny of female students had crossed the line from irritating to what she called “predatory.”
Though girls by and large were adhering to a new rule requiring longer skirts – introduced at a school assembly dedicated to attire, Duchan said — they were being called out for skirts deemed too tight, shirts judged as too revealing or sleeves ruled too short.
Fed up, Duchan, a senior, penned a letter to the Flatbush staff.
“Girls are ambushed almost daily, while a boy is rarely seen getting chastised for his clothing. This inequality exposes the misogyny underlying the rules,” she wrote. “This predatory culture is counterproductive. It causes negative associations with the concept of modesty and makes girls feel hunted.”
Though Duchan posted the letter on a private Facebook group, it spread quickly online, striking a chord with those who believe that the Jewish value of tzniut, or modesty, too often is used by men and those in power to bully women — or worse.
“I find the obsessive focus on what girls wear unhealthy and frankly creepy,” Miriam Shaviv, an Orthodox Jewish parent in London wrote on Facebook. “It creates a society every bit as sexually obsessive as the one we are supposedly trying to be different to. I do not want my daughters reduced to the length of their skirts!”
Many day schools have dress codes, and it’s common for Orthodox high schools to require girls to wear skirts.
The Yeshivah of Flatbush, known for its large population of Syrian-Jewish students, is one of a number of modern Orthodox day schools in the New York area that draws students from a diverse range of religious backgrounds. Some male students do not wear kippahs outside of school, and most of the girls wear pants or shorts when they’re home.
Elana Maryles Sztokman, co-author of the book “Educating in the Divine Image: Gender Issues in Orthodox Jewish Day Schools,” said the focus on Orthodox girls’ attire treats women like sex objects rather than people.
“It’s this relentless conversation around it, the way the entire community continues to talk about girls’ knees and elbows and thighs and necks, as if girls have this responsibility towards the community to present themselves a certain way, as if their sexuality is open for discussion, as if their bodies are owned by the entire community (in and out of school), as if their clothes are reflections of their sexual choices, as if their sexuality is something that can and should be debated at large, as if the constant gaze on their bodies is normal and right,” Sztokman, a Yeshivah of Flatbush alumna, wrote in a Facebook commentary.
Michael Kellman, a Jewish day school parent, said the problem isn’t just with yeshivas and Orthodox rules.
“It’s not just that our rules are different for men and women, it’s that society’s rules are different,” Kellman said in an interview. “It’s easier to be a guy complying with the dress code. It’s not fair out in the world.”
After her letter was posted, Duchan said she was inundated with expressions of support from fellow students, parents and even some sympathetic school staff. Though Duchan did not sign her missive, the document’s link to her Google Drive account made Duchan’s authorship clear.
On Wednesday, Duchan said she was summoned to the office of Flatbush’s associate principal, Sari Bacon. According to Duchan, Bacon and a guidance counselor talked with her as if she had “personal issues” rather than treating the letter as an act of protest.
Duchan noted to JTA that every morning when the students walk into school, two non-Jewish women stand at the entryway scrutinizing students for dress code violations.
School administrators reached by JTA declined to be interviewed for this story, though Bacon called Duchan a “wonderful girl.”
The dress code guidelines at the Yeshivah of Flatbush’s elementary school run 10 pages long and include photos and links to vendors.
The dress code at Flatbush requires boys to wear tzitzit ritual fringes, kippahs, collared shirts and Dockers-style pants. Girls must wear skirts that are midcalf or longer, tops must have necklines that cover the collarbone and are “long enough to cover the middle of the body, even when leaning over or raising one’s hand,” and only one earring per earlobe is permitted.
Orthodox tradition forbids men to look at a woman’s legs and, according to some interpretations, their elbows. By contrast, men may be seen by women wearing nothing but swimming trunks.
Duchan said she is sympathetic to the need for a dress code that reflects the school’s values. But the administration’s approach goes too far, she said perverting what the school ought to be teaching and stoking student resentment.
“Every school should have clear priorities; in ours, trivial concerns like a few inches of fabric have superseded more important aspects of the school environment like integrity and respect for others,” Duchan wrote in her letter. “This has created a toxic and tense relationship between administrators and students and has bred widespread resentment and frustration. From our perspective, it appears that the school heads have failed to grasp the basic tenet of education: to learn.”
From JTA, September 11, 2014