On 02/03/18 07:38, Jeremy Rosenbaum Simon wrote:
> I do not follow your argument at all. Whenever it was inserted, it is
> certainly parallel to geshem/gashem, So I wouldn't it follow the same
> structure?
No, because it's an independent phrase that was dropped in to the
previous text, so it retains its own internal structure regardless of
the fact that it's now surrounded by a larger unit. So, "geshem" which
is an integral part of the original unit, is not a pause; "tol", which
ends its unit, is a pause.
If you like, think of it as a deliberate indication that this is not
part of the original text.
--
Zev Sero A prosperous and healthy 2018 to all
z...@sero.name Seek Jerusalem's peace; may all who love you prosper