Why are there no releases?

ngd

unread,

Sep 14, 2010, 5:59:20 AM9/14/10

to Datejs - A JavaScript Date Library

I see there are no releases in the download section after 2007. I also
read that we have to download from SVN and do the build ourselves. Is
this library stable enough to be used in production environment?

Thanks.

geoffrey.mcgill

unread,

Sep 17, 2010, 12:43:57 PM9/17/10

to Datejs - A JavaScript Date Library

It's so stable it hasn't been updated in two years. ;)

Chris Pratt

unread,

Sep 17, 2010, 1:00:23 PM9/17/10

to dat...@googlegroups.com

It's very stable and usable, which is why it's doubly sad that there hasn't been a release in three years. At least packaging up the stable code into a downloadable distribution would be a huge step forward.
(*Chris*)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Datejs - A JavaScript Date Library" group.
To post to this group, send email to dat...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to datejs+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datejs?hl=en.

geoffrey.mcgill

unread,

Sep 17, 2010, 1:03:42 PM9/17/10

to Datejs - A JavaScript Date Library

> At least packaging up the stable code into a
> downloadable distribution would be a huge step forward.

Yes, agreed. This is a high priority for me. I lost some code which
automated this process, so I have to re-create and just haven't had
the time/opportunity to concentrate on replacing it.

On Sep 17, 11:00 am, Chris Pratt <thechrispr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's very stable and usable, which is why it's doubly sad that there hasn't
> been a release in three years. At least packaging up the stable code into a
> downloadable distribution would be a huge step forward.
> (*Chris*)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 2:59 AM, ngd <nikhil.daddi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I see there are no releases in the download section after 2007. I also
> > read that we have to download from SVN and do the build ourselves. Is
> > this library stable enough to be used in production environment?
>
> > Thanks.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Datejs - A JavaScript Date Library" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to dat...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

> > datejs+un...@googlegroups.com<datejs%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>
> > .

Ben McIntyre

unread,

Sep 17, 2010, 9:22:28 PM9/17/10

to dat...@googlegroups.com

If it hasn't changed in two years, maybe just doing the build manually once
will get us out of trouble for another few years ?
:-)

Ben

> > datejs+un...@googlegroups.com<datejs%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroup
> > datejs+s.com>

> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/datejs?hl=en.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Datejs - A JavaScript Date Library" group.
To post to this group, send email to dat...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

datejs+un...@googlegroups.com.

Peter Boughton

unread,

Oct 12, 2010, 10:24:49 AM10/12/10

to Datejs - A JavaScript Date Library

Or, at the very least, remove the "alpha" label from the code.

Clearly it's not alpha-quality code, but the label potentially may put
some people off using it.

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward