Rebeca Barros
Hello everyone,
I found this thread which corresponds to my doubt, since I have tried to validate DDI from Dataverse and it fails with DDI 2.5 schema. What I do not understand though, is why this issue is treated like a suggestion? It should not be crucial for Dataverse to produce valid DDI documents? This could not implicated negatively in how other systems consume the information available in Dataverse?
I am thinking about adopting Dataverse as repository in my digital preservation scenario. But since others systems will not be able to check if the metadata is valid or not, it makes me wonder.
Philip Durbin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dataverse Users Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dataverse-community+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to dataverse-community@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dataverse-community/22dbf24e-c0e6-4264-b7e4-1833a4048c11%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Software Developer for http://dataverse.org
http://www.iq.harvard.edu/people/philip-durbin
julian...@g.harvard.edu
Rebeca Barros
Hi, guys.
Thanks for answer so promptly. I would like to say that Dataverse is an incredible initiative and a great tool. It is sound ideal as a research datasets repository.
Julian, in my work, we are starting an initiative to preserve some datasets (csv, stata, spss and others). We found out about Dataverse and it sounds really good because it has features like versioning, restrict access to the files, OAI-PMH support and because works with DDI, which, as far as I could understand, is the main metadata standard for research datasets and it is the standard that we intend to use.
The idea, so far, is to use Dataverse as our main access repository and for description metadata creation. Then we found about this initiative to integrate Dataverse with Archivematica, which focus on implement the OAIS recommendations for digital preservation and thus could be responsible for implement some of these recommendations and for the AIP package creation.
Hi Rebecca,Could you write more about how Dataverse would work in your scenario? It helps a lot with prioritizing this among other Dataverse development work?I agree with you and Phil that it's crucial.
On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 12:42:54 PM UTC-4, Philip Durbin wrote:
PhilGood point. I adjusted the title and changed the label from "suggestion" to "bug": https://github.com/IQSS/dataverse/issues/3648I agree that this is crucial.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Rebeca Barros <bk.b...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello everyone,
I found this thread which corresponds to my doubt, since I have tried to validate DDI from Dataverse and it fails with DDI 2.5 schema. What I do not understand though, is why this issue is treated like a suggestion? It should not be crucial for Dataverse to produce valid DDI documents? This could not implicated negatively in how other systems consume the information available in Dataverse?
I am thinking about adopting Dataverse as repository in my digital preservation scenario. But since others systems will not be able to check if the metadata is valid or not, it makes me wonder.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Dataverse Users Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to dataverse-community+unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to dataverse...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dataverse-community/22dbf24e-c0e6-4264-b7e4-1833a4048c11%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.