Re: [Dataverse-Users] Digest for dataverse-community@googlegroups.com - 1 update in 1 topic

[tlchristian]

I would love to discuss this further as well.  The tennis analogy is certainly apt for our use case.  I would love to be able to customize the email messages to include specific information we need to convey to the authors.  Also, getting the editor in the communication mix would solve some of our workflow inefficiencies, which is another reason for customized email messages.  Being able to manage communications among author, editor, and data curator within the Dataverse system would significantly streamline the workflow.

~Thu-Mai

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 5:31 AM, <dataverse...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

dataverse-community@googlegroups.com

Google Groups

Topic digest
View all topics

• Help Wanted: stories related to "Submit for Review" and "Return to Author" - 1 Update

Help Wanted: stories related to "Submit for Review" and "Return to Author"

Steven McEachern <stev...@gmail.com>: Jul 03 07:22AM -0700 Hi Phil,   Thanks for picking this up. As you note, we do have a more detailed curation model in mind - and the tennis match metaphor is apt : "this process might look a bit like a tennis match with the dataset bouncing between author(s) and curators(s) before the dataset is ultimately published". Under this model there are often several iterations of communication between the researcher and the curator/archive.   Two points in particular come to mind: 1. There can be a significant amount of information conveyed in those messages, which we would want to *capture and preserve* as an archive, to support the provenance of the dataset. 2. We don't want to create a chat service - but we do want a formal message service to provide comment back to the author.   This type of workflow is also relevant to other approval processes. Our current ADA use case at the moment is that of Restricted Access datasets. The user requests data, and then the author wants information on the intended use (or the user) - who wants it, and WHY. We are currently extending the Guestbook and Restricted Access functionality to enable this, but would love to see it embedded directly into the main codebase (and have discussed this with Gustavo and Danny).   Can I suggest this might be a good discussion for a community call? I'd be happy to talk about what ADA is doing with Restricted Access, and what some of our interests are in the Submit for Review process.   Cheers, Steve     On Friday, June 30, 2017 at 11:39:50 PM UTC+10, Philip Durbin wrote:

Back to top

You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to dataverse-community+unsub...@googlegroups.com.