Discussion on technologies-to-build-on
Daniel Koller
during #ldc09?
Daniel
Michael Hausenblas
> ...is there a further need for the ARC-PHP based samples we worked on
> during #ldc09?
Hm, if you mean the DCW [1] - no, not really, IMHO. This was just to show
how a consumer could be implemented in an distributed setting. The main
reason for the DCW is the voiD+dady based discovery (and hence you need an
RDF store/lib) and as I had ARC2 handy and know it a bit, I happened to use
it ;)
No further dependencies. Happy to not further go for it if the group has any
sort of issues with it.
Cheers,
Michael
[1] http://code.google.com/p/dady/source/browse/#hg/sandbox/ldc09/consumer
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html
Daniel Koller
Kind regards,
Daniel
---
Daniel Koller
Jahnstrasse 20
80469 München * dako...@googlemail.com
Michael Hausenblas
> ...ok with me: we should think also about the actual "update" part...that
> means if the notifications on changes took place...(would be one roundtrip
> example to show the process for the sync usecase (I think it was no. 1).
Agree. Can you flesh this out a bit Daniel, maybe directly on the respective
Wiki page [1]?
Cheers,
Michael
[1]
http://groups.google.com/group/dataset-dynamics/web/technologies-to-build-on
npopitsch
Click on http://groups.google.com/group/dataset-dynamics/web/technologies-to-build-on
- or copy & paste it into your browser's address bar if that doesn't
work.
juum
behas
Daniel Koller
...i would likely not make it to the call, will join next time.
Kind regards,
Daniel