DataPortability.Action.Implementation [deprecated]

A few days ago I posted in another group about SyncML in DataPortability, and got a few answers at

I think you're concerned with the wrong issues. The project is not really moving forward, few

Hi, I'll be holding a short 2 day course on the Semantic Web in the first half of July at the

Trent, I'd be up for talking about experimental implementation of the AX key for XRDS-S discovery

Paul thanks so much for putting these drafts together - they will form a super important basis for

Message from Mary Trigiani (for some reason, her e-mails are bouncing, so I am posting this for her)

We are working on something similar for the android challender. Hope to put it on open source after

Hi Stephen - Excellent - glad to hear about FOAF module - some related links: SIOC module, still

Will, Let me be the first to say welcome to the DataPortability Project. The Implementation Action

On Feb 22, 11:58 pm, Julian Bond <julian_b...@voidstar.com> wrote: > Of the people here,

On 20/02/2008, Mike Reynolds <reyn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm for this merger.

http://protobuilt.com/2008/01/15/developers-10-things-you-can-do-now-for-data-portability/ It's a

Due to popular demand, the EAG took consideration to extend the deadline as awareness of the

id be really interested to know if anyone has yet tackled the issue of unit testing a dp

On 06/02/2008, sebnem <sebnem_...@hotmail.com> wrote: > With Flock you have a smooth

Brilliant! Inspired from this discussion: http://protobuilt.com/2008/01/15/developers-10-things-you-

This is really great stuff guys. Inspired from this discussion: http://protobuilt.com/2008/02/06/

cool, how can I join? On Feb 6, 12:28 pm, Antonio Tapiador del Dujo <atapia...@dit.upm.es>

OK. I'll start working on #1 below. I'll begin assembling a small list of companies, focusing

I read the post below and that seems like a lot (cost) to get started. We are a start up at fashions.

ive posted my thoughts on the addition of the projects to the questions as a reply to the questions

this page is the result of an earlier discussion entitled "Implementation Action Group

I think this is brilliant Richard. Makes sense to formally separate out tools that can be used to do

hi daniela, im a big fan of faqs and definitions where they make things clearer for contributers, and

Sounds great Richard.

Something that was an earlier effort, which got spun off, is WRFS. It's more like a client side

In line with the Evanglists Action Group's responsibilities, I've created our first draft

**Any discussion in the Skype chat rooms are potential big topics of discussion and will be compiled